Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance
debt, including our ability to obtain the
debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our
exposure under our revolving credit facility to
higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30)
exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
We would reduce
exposure to non-investment grade bonds (
high - yield
debt).
The index caps
exposure to countries with
higher outstanding
debt.
Harvey Norman is now at risk of losing its entire equity investment and some or all of its
debt exposure if the receivers — Peter Anderson, William Harris and Matthew Caddy of McGrath Nicol — fail to find a buyer willing to pay a
high enough price to repay National Australia Bank, which as secured creditor ranks ahead of Harvey Norman.
In order to reduce your
debt exposure on your credit cards, you need to destine
higher amounts of income towards credit card payments.
There is no
exposure to currency risk,
high yield bonds or emerging market
debt.
A desirable
debt exposure is the one that spreads
debt along wider periods of time even if the interests are
higher because repaying such
debt is easier when there are income limitations.
If you're paying 18 %, 23 % or 29 % on credit card
debt, each dollar you contribute to paying off the balance reduces your
exposure to those
high rates.
High Yield Bonds ETFs offer investors
exposure to
debt issued by below investment grade corporations.
Adopting the discipline of rebalancing bond
exposures toward fundamental weights, which are linked to the economic size of the underlying issuing companies rather than to the amount of
debt they have issued, achieves the dual objective of: 1) tilting holdings toward companies with better
debt servicing and
higher credit ratings; and 2) taking advantage of mean reversion in securities prices over time.
In broad, I lean toward reducing risk
exposure, and sitting on
high quality short term
debt.
Vanguard's VSG has a similar duration, but
higher credit quality and
exposure to federal government issued
debt than to its two closest rivals, First Asset's FGB and iShares» CLF, Kletz says.
Then I choose another one that's risker (
debt and European
exposure) but has a
higher yield (TEF @ about $ 20).
The empowerment fund serves as a private
debt offering for these investors who seek
exposure to a diversified, vetted, and
high - impact portfolio of solar projects in emerging markets.
«As incomes rise in the sector, banks have seen an opportunity to get repayments started on some of this unsecured
debt, and reduce their
exposure to a sector that some of them still regard as being
higher risk.»
Dynamic Fund Allocation balances equity and
debt exposure in the portfolio by automatic allocation of fund value as per predetermined percentages —
higher allocation to equities in the initial policy years for generating potentially
higher returns, and later,
higher allocation to
debt as the policy nears maturity to protect the maturity value.
According to analysts, the best way to invest for childcare is to adopt a systematic approach of
high exposure to equity in the early years of the child and raising
exposure to
debt funds in the later part of the investment horizon.
Funds with an aggressive profile have a
high equity
exposure, while those with a secure or conservative profile invest in
debt and have zero
exposure to equities.
When it comes to investments, policyholders can either opt for
high - risk funds that provide more
exposure to equity, or
debt - oriented funds that are relatively risk - free.
This is driven by large
exposure to
debt instruments and the
high - cost structures.
High exposure to
debt also increases likelihood of protection of principal amount.
However, the appetite for real estate
debt and equity remains
high, and investors — both domestic and international — are seeking to double down on their
exposure to real estate.