Not exact matches
The best estimates of the increase in global temperatures range from 1.8 to 4.0 degrees C for the various
emission scenarios, with
higher emissions leading to
higher temperatures.
«We find that current
emission trends continue to track
scenarios that
lead to the
highest temperature increases,» they wrote in an analysis published yesterday in the journal Nature Climate Change.
On the
high end, recent work suggests that 4 feet is plausible.23, 3,6,7,8 In the context of risk - based analysis, some decision makers may wish to use a wider range of
scenarios, from 8 inches to 6.6 feet by 2100.10,2 In particular, the
high end of these
scenarios may be useful for decision makers with a low tolerance for risk (see Figure 2.26 on global sea level rise).10, 2 Although scientists can not yet assign likelihood to any particular
scenario, in general,
higher emissions scenarios that
lead to more warming would be expected to
lead to
higher amounts of sea level rise.
This effectively gave a much greater weight to the
high emission (A1)
scenarios compared with
scenarios in the other families that the SRES authors elected not to explore in the same detail, and
led to a significant upward bias in the probability distribution.
This is presented as a worst - case
scenario — what might be expected to happen if a) nothing is done to curb GHG
emissions and b) the climate sensitivity is in the
higher range Peter Cox and other
leading scientists now believe possible.
Even with a low climate sensitivity,
high emissions scenarios will
lead to warming exceeding the nominal 2 °C target.
Leaving the Paris accord and failing to meet our commitment — as Trump intends — puts the world on track for a «
higher emissions»
scenario that
leads to unimaginable impacts.
For example, stormwater across the city of Milwaukee recently showed
high human fecal pathogen levels at all 45 outflow locations, indicating widespread sewage contamination.87 One study estimated that increased storm events will
lead to an increase of up to 120 % in combined sewer overflows into Lake Michigan by 2100 under a very
high emissions scenario (A1FI), 57
leading to additional human health issues and beach closures.
Notably, future drought risk will likely exceed even the driest centuries of the Medieval Climate Anomaly (1100 - 1300 CE) in both moderate (RCP 4.5) and
high (RCP 8.5) future
emissions scenarios,
leading to unprecedented drought conditions during the last millennium.
The WGI report is based on a new type of
scenarios of future anthropogenic
emissions called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs), which include a mitigation
scenario leading to a very low climate forcing, two stabilization
scenarios and one
scenario with very
high GHG
emissions.
The research,
led by Australian researchers from the CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, predicts that Australia's national average temperature will increase by 2.8 - 5.1 °C by 2090 in a
high emissions scenario, compared to 0.6 - 1.7 °C under a low global
emissions scenario.
The radiative forcing estimates are based on the forcing of greenhouse gases and other forcing agents.5 The four selected RCPs were considered to be representative of the literature, and included one mitigation
scenario leading to a very low forcing level (RCP2.6), two medium stabilization
scenarios (RCP4.5 / RCP6) and one very
high baseline
emission scenarios (RCP8.5).
Both wetland drying and the increased frequency of warm dry summers and associated thunderstorms have
led to more large fires in the last ten years than in any decade since record - keeping began in the 1940s.9 In Alaskan tundra, which was too cold and wet to support extensive fires for approximately the last 5,000 years, 105 a single large fire in 2007 released as much carbon to the atmosphere as had been absorbed by the entire circumpolar Arctic tundra during the previous quarter - century.106 Even if climate warming were curtailed by reducing heat - trapping gas (also known as greenhouse gas)
emissions (as in the B1
scenario), the annual area burned in Alaska is projected to double by mid-century and to triple by the end of the century, 107 thus fostering increased
emissions of heat - trapping gases,
higher temperatures, and increased fires.
«This is more than 50 percent
higher than the old projections (18 - 59 cm)[in its last assessment in 2007 - AR4] when comparing the same
emission scenarios and time periods,» notes Stefan Rahmstorf, Head of Earth System Analysis at Potsdam University, Germany, and a
leading authority on sea level rise.