Not exact matches
The country's newest space lab, Tiangong - 2, for example, hosts a number of scientific payloads, including an advanced atomic clock and a $ 3.4 - million detector called POLAR for the study of γ - ray bursts — blasts of
high -
energy radiation from collapsing stars and other
sources.
But the
high -
energy radiation from the
source has shown no sign of dying down, which suggests that astronomers may have caught a star in the process of being ripped to shreds by a black hole.
The correlation we observed is compatible with the hypothesis that the
highest -
energy particles originate from nearby extragalactic
sources whose flux has not been substantially reduced by interaction with the cosmic background
radiation.
Such a telescope would use large arrays of ground - based telescopes to detect blue flashes of Cerenkov
radiation, which are caused by very
high energy gamma - ray photons from cosmic
sources smashing into the atmosphere.
The PBCr developed will be used for the construction of novel light
sources of
high -
energy monochromatic electromagnetic
radiation by means of a Crystalline Undulator (CU).
It does seem at first glance that a warm troposphere would warm the stratosphere, but the explanation that more of the earth -
sourced infrared
radiation is absorbed lower in the the troposphere by
higher levels of CO2 makes sense if one thinks about the thermodynamic losses involved in the CO2 re-
radiation processes; some of the earth -
sourced infrared is transformed into kinetic
energy and only a fraction is reradiated as more infrared
radiation (if I'm understanding correctly).
Tom Vonk is correct when he says that the following statements are over-simplifications and need corrections (in caps): «CO2 absorbs AND EMITS the outgoing infrared
energy and warms the atmosphere TO A
HIGHER TEMPERATURE THAN IT WOULD HAVE WITHOUT CO2» — or — «CO2 traps part of the infrared
radiation between ground and the upper part of the atmosphere» AND IS THE MAJOR SOURCE OF INFRARED RADIATION FROM THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE
radiation between ground and the upper part of the atmosphere» AND IS THE MAJOR
SOURCE OF INFRARED
RADIATION FROM THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE
RADIATION FROM THE UPPER ATMOSPHERE TO SPACE.
It might help you if you had a few concepds in mind too when considering this subject, like «space» is the big
energy «sink» with old sol (and the internal heat generating processes (including nuclear) of the earth) as
sources... any mechanism that results in a delay of
energy leaving earth, such as a «bounce - back» or a re-rad of
energy (like back
radiation) certainly is going to increase the «
energy flux» in the system, and this in any way you want to frame the argument translates to a «
higher»
energy state, and a
higher so - called temperature» (movement in matter, velocity of air molecules or oscillations in certain «resonant molecules) as well.
If a second blackbody object (no internal thermal
energy source but with thermal conduction properties such that independent of the direction of incident
radiation on the second object, the second object's surface temperature will be everywhere the same) is placed next to but NOT touching the original object, when the two - object system reaches steady state (i.e., for each object, the rate of
energy leaving the object will equal the rate of
energy entering the object), the surface temperature of the original object in the presence of the second object will be
higher than it was in the absence of the second object.