While I find evidence that higher temperatures lead to less males, I find nothing that says that
high enough temperatures result in no males.
Not exact matches
Frying (or sauteing) with just
enough fat or oil to prevent sticking at a relatively
high temperature causes the meat to brown — in very simple terms, the proteins at the surface of the meat are converted to other proteins that
result in a more intense flavor.»
While the reduced depletion was due mostly to
higher temperatures on the icy continent, scientists are hopeful that the chemical levels have dropped
enough that the
result is a shrinkage of the ozone hole each season.
Would the much lower albedo
result in
higher temperatures over a broad
enough region to accelerate the crossing of other «tipping points» elsewhere, such as the release of large quantities of methane / CO2 from Siberian peat?
Poor thermal control, especially at windows, slab edges, and areas of framing congestion, can
result in low
enough or
high enough interior surface
temperatures as to compromise comfort.
However, there are only 50 states, and this is a number that isn't large
enough to give the best statistical
results... [a better metric is a] year - by - year numbers of daily all - time record
high temperatures from a set of 970 weather stations with at least 80 years of record... There are 365 opportunities in each year (366 in leap years) for each of the 970 stations to set a record
high... Note the several years above 6000 events prior to 1940 and none above 5000 since 1954.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of
temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of
temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good
enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a
high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average
temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100
resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
Considering that America has 22.1 percent of the world's proven coal reserves, the greatest of any country and
enough to last for 381 years at current consumption rates, it is a tragedy that the U.S. can no longer build new, clean, coal - fired power stations to replace its aging fleet of coal plants.Supercritical power plants operate at very
high temperatures and pressures,
resulting in significantly greater efficiencies than older technologies.
Planting a bit early, if the fields are dry
enough to support farm machinery, can improve
results — but that outcome depends on having
enough soil moisture, and having no peak
temperature during the summer
high enough to stop seed from forming.