Plus, they can potentially put you into investments that have
high expense ratios while not offering you similar ones with lower expense ratios.
Not exact matches
While many do have slightly
higher expense ratios than their developed - market peers — a reflection of the
higher cost of investing in these markets — that is not always the case.
While the index fund itself might have a super low
expense ratio, its wrap fee could make the investment
high - priced.
While CFRA incorporates a fund's
expense ratio in our forward - looking rating of more than 1,300 ETFs, we think the performance gap between two ETFs will often be much greater than the
high - profile fee differential.
While higher tax rates and administrative
expenses reduced Banco Agrícola's 2012 net income to $ 89.1 million, profitability
ratios remained strong.
While some of the funds have
expense ratios on the
high side, the average
expense ratio is 0.12 percent.
And
while cutting investing costs can't guarantee a larger nest egg, Morningstar research shows that funds with the lowest
expense ratios tend to outperform their
higher - fee counterparts.
While 0.29 % is not a
high expense ratio, it was much
higher than a similar fund the Vanguard Large Cap Index Fund (VLACX) that has an
expense ratio of 0.18 %.
While the AMC is free to charge what it wants, what makes the managers feel they deserve this
high an
expense ratio.
iShares sports the lowest
expense ratio (all funds have an
expense ratio of only 0.10 %),
while Guggenheim's funds offer a little better liquidity, slightly
higher yield (for a number of reasons, as we discuss below) and diversity from a larger number of holdings and by including financial companies in their holdings.
While the
expense ratios for them can be low, some are
high, and they all have important differences that can cost you more money.
And
while Sarah appears happy with her bank mutual fund investment strategy, she should nonetheless watch for the fees and
high management
expense ratios she is paying on these financial products.
Ultimately, it is up to the investor to trade off portfolio returns for risk — some may choose to optimize for the
highest return per unit of risk,
while others may strive for
higher returns at the
expense of a sub-optimal Sharpe
ratio.
Some mutual funds charge expensive upfront fees,
while others are no - load mutual funds; some mutual funds have
high expense ratios,
while others keep costs low.
The
High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) saw its
expense ratio decline to 0.09 % from 0.10 %,
while Global Ex-US Real Estate (VNQI) had
expenses of 0.18 % in the 2015 fiscal year vs. 0.24 % a year earlier.
For the most part, Class A shares bear front - end load charges, Class B have back - end charges,
while Class C might evade load charges altogether at the cost of a
higher expense ratio.
When the emerging markets bond mutual fund sub-category is considered,
expense ratios are even
higher,
while these other shortcomings persist.