Sentences with phrase «high growth companies usually»

High margin, high growth companies usually mean revert due to: (1) new entrants and future competition; (2) new, disruptive business models; and / or (3) new technologies that make a company's product obsolete.

Not exact matches

«The companies that are more comfortable spending a higher amount early are usually rewarded with higher growth metrics, but you don't necessarily get bonus points for being cash conservative in the early days,» she says.

Balanced funds, which usually invest in a mix of about 60 percent stock to 40 percent bonds, growth and income funds, or equity income funds that invest in well - established companies that pay high dividends, might be appropriate choices for a mid-term portfolio.

Software companies usually sell at larger p / e ratios because they have much higher growth rates and earn higher returns on equity, while a textile mill, subject to dismal profit margins and low growth prospects, might trade at a much smaller multiple.

High - yield bonds are usually issued by firms that have an uncertain financial outlook — either they have fallen into deteriorating credit situations, they are emerging growth companies, or they are undergoing corporate restructurings.

Companies like AT&T or Realty Income deserve higher P / E ratios when interest rates are 2 % compared to 8 % as the purpose of the investment is usually a quasi-bond with a growth kick compared to something like Visa where the purpose is long - term future growth.

Companies in the consumer staples sector may not pay a yield as high as those in the utilities sector but growth is usually slightly higher.

That's much higher than what I'd expect from a fairly mature company like this, as I usually like to see mid-single-digit revenue growth from a large, multinational business.

So called high dividend stocks are usually from companies that have stable cash flows but relatively little or moderate growth potential.

The low beta, or relative risk and performance to the market, will show that these stocks tend to either perform better - or at least not as poorly - as cyclical stocks in bad times and will usually not be most investors» focal points during the boom part of the business cycle when investors are busy chasing technology stocks and high - growth companies.

Compared to the S&P 500, S&P 500 Quality has a tilt towards value stocks, lower debt, lower earnings volatility and higher earnings growth — which are attributes usually associated with «good quality» companies.

Smaller high - growth companies tend to outperform their larger peers over the long - term and hugely successful ones are referred to as the five or ten — baggers which is the term used to describe stocks which have increased five to ten times in share price over a length of time, usually three, five or ten years.

This is not what I expect — the market's usually far more enthusiastic than I am for a high growth company!