Sentences with phrase «high latitudes makes»

Anyone at high latitudes makes far less vitamin D per minute of sun exposure.
Nowadays only the sea surface warming expressed by Endersbee seems to make higher portions of manmade CO2 in atmosphere possible, as the warming of the as sinks acting sea surfaces at the higher latitudes makes absorption of CO2 from the atmosphere become slower.

Not exact matches

However, if you live in a part of the world that makes sun exposure difficult, either because of higher latitudes, cold or because baby is required to be in several layers of clothes, then it is recommended that babies be given a Vitamin D supplement.
But there really aren't many winners in the long run because even if the higher latitudes are given an advantage, they still are faced with moving food across large distances and making sure that it's done in such a way that the farming systems in the receiving countries are not put out of business because of the inundation of free or subsidized food.
The name change was made in 1982 to reflect the membership's growing interest in high latitudes outside of Alaska.
The most recent news making events are two: a challenge to the dates that have been assigned to Neanderthal remains closest to the time of their extinction; and a claim Neanderthals occupied a site in the Siberian far North, at much higher latitudes than previously thought possible.
This makes it possible for the Sun to rotate faster at its equator (about 25 days) than it does at higher latitudes (about 35 days near its poles).
This calculation can be made in considering the flow and the delta temperatures between mid-latitudes and high - latitudes of the NAD and by comparing this delta to the theorical necessary energy to obtain the high - latitude recorded temperatures.
Actually, there is some interesting work being done by Matt Huber of Purdue, following up on some earlier ideas of Emanuel's, suggesting that the role of TCs in transporting heat from equator towards the poles may be more significant than previously thought — it also allows for some interesting, though admittedly somewhat exotic, mechanisms for explaining the «cool tropics paradox» and «equable climate problem» of the early Paleogene and Cretaceous periods, i.e. the problem of how to make the higher latitudes warm without warming the tropics much, something that appears to have happened during some past warm epochs in Earth's history.
Smaller obliquity transfers annual average insolation from higher latitudes (would make polar regions darker) to lower latitudes and reduces the seasonal ranges (would make winters less dark for less long).
That they could bask in the sun merely confirms what these scientists have long suspected: that Earth's high latitudes are warming dangerously thanks to man - made climate change, with temperatures rising at twice the global average.
«While warmer waters might attract new species to colder regions, the rise in temperature might make the environment inhospitable to current species in the region that can not move to even higher latitudes,» said Pauly.
If I understood Armour's paper correctly, he claimed that all feed - backs were close to linear in response to temperature over time, but that different regional warming rates (specifically, slow warming at high latitudes) could make the feed - backs and sensitivity appear to increase with time.
I suspect it's not 1C over all the globe but just over relatively dry parts of the globe (higher latitudes over continents) where conduction (and hence surface temperature) has to increase make up for the higher impedence through the radiative path because there's no latent path (and hence no rise in temperature) to make up the difference.
A suggestion was made that the current increase in ring width in the high latitudes might be due to CO2 fertilisation as well as higher temperatures, but this is unsupported by research.
Once it reaches the horse latitudes, the now dry air descends and heats, creating the large high pressure cells that make up the STR.
It seems clear enough from evidence of the geologic past that before the earth started ringing like a bell every 120K years from glacial to interglacial with the former dominating the other 10:1 in persistence, the Eocene optimum 50 million years ago the earth was ice - free, green from pole to pole, it was about 11F warmer overall, with the most dramatic warming in the highest latitudes (right where you'd want it if you could ask for it), and atmspheric CO2 was several times what it is today, which makes sense in light of much warmer global ocean not able to hold as much CO2.
The largest reservoirs of carbon on land are in the forests of the tropics and the soils of northern high latitudes, which are paradoxically, the least studied of terrestrial ecosystems, with the bulk of research effort made where most ecologists live, in the mid-latitudes.
Mosher mentioned that there are larger siting issues are at the higher latitudes which makes sense.
This decreases the export of excess salt to the Pacific; it also makes the high latitudes colder and the tropics warmer.
In this particular case, the multiple timescale issue arising from slow mixing at higher latitudes seems to make any analysis with a linear dependence on global mean surface temperature suspect.
Nearly all fish and marine reptiles were driven to higher latitudes, and those creatures that remained were often smaller, making it easier for them to shed any heat from their bodies.
C / decade and the simulated ensemble mean over the models, calculated from the grid boxes of the models where observations exist (which is flawed in my opinion, since excluding of mostly the high latitudes from the model data may emphasize a warm bias in lower latitudes in the models making them appear warmer than they are, but a possible cold bias of the global observations data set is not excluded in this way) had a trend of 0.3 deg.
This water must be replaced by dense waters made in the high latitudes.
As with warming, we would expect higher latitudes to be more sensitive to cooling due to the ice albedo feedback, which in this case is from growing ice coverage, so this makes sense to me.
So the factor of two arises because of cancellations of the contributions from lower latitudes, making the relatively small adjustments at high Arctic regions relatively more important.
In contrast, predictions made by the chemistry - climate models indicate that, as a consequence of ozone recovery — a factor largely ignored by IPCC models — the tropospheric winds in the Southern Hemisphere may actually decelerate in the high latitudes and move toward the equator, potentially reversing the direction of climate change in that hemisphere.
The warming in surface temperatures at higher latitudes, as described in this study, are firmly ascribed to man - made climate change by the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).
Small islands, whether located in the tropics or higher latitudes, have characteristics which make them especially vulnerable to the effects of climate change, sea - level rise and extreme events.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z