Stretched valuations,
high levels of uncertainty about the macroeconomic backdrop and tight correlations would seem to warrant a closer look at assets that can help offer true diversification benefits and downside protection in the event of another synchronized decline across a whole spectrum of riskier assets.
Throughout this period, companies have been dealing with
high levels of uncertainty about the prospects for the global economy, in some cases because of aggressive deleveraging.
At the same time, so many of the schools we speak to are in flux, experiencing
a high level of uncertainty about where technology is going.
When the market opens on Monday, there's
a high level of uncertainty about the direction each pair will take in the week ahead.
Not exact matches
«In Canada as in the U.S. and Europe, the most common question investment consultants are asked by clients
about ESG is whether an ESG - based approach will negatively impact investment performance,» said Andrew Sweeney, Institutional Portfolio Manager at RBC Global Asset Management Inc. «This and other data from the survey reveal a
high level of interest and curiosity
about responsible investing, including areas
of significant
uncertainty.
Research done at the Bank
of Canada and elsewhere, including conversations with business leaders, suggests that the main cause
of weak investment is the
high level of uncertainty that companies are facing, particularly
about future demand prospects.
We remain optimistic
about the U.S. economy even though the
level of political
uncertainty remains
high.
Because
of uncertainty about the size and timing
of payments under RTGS, some commentators had foreseen a situation in which banks would seek to hold
high levels of ES funds, raising banks» costs.
The reason for Australia's third - ranking iron ore miner traditionally being seen more as prey than predator is a function
of its once sky -
high debt
levels,
uncertainty about its ore grade, and a belief that at some point Forrest would be tempted to cash out
of the company he created.
The substantial
uncertainties currently present in the quantitative assessment
of large - scale surface temperature changes prior to
about A.D. 1600 lower our confidence in this conclusion compared to the
high level of confidence we place in the Little Ice Age cooling and 20th century warming.»
For instance,
uncertainty about the 1994 - 1998 Rwandan refugees» future in exile is compounded by the recent resolution
of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to launch military attacks on refugees based in the DRC.35 No account has been taken concerning the fact that they are survivors
of the 1996 - 2000 massive forced repatriation and that they have been more vulnerable to extremely stressful and traumatic events that took place since the invasion
of Rwanda on October 01, 1990.36 Although they are indeed susceptible to posttraumatic stress disorder, depression,
high level of fear and anxiety (psychosomatic) and / or malnutrition caused by the persecution and destruction
of the war, no one who wants to empathise with them.
In addition to
uncertainties about how CAPC will evolve, Rodriguez's sudden dismissal follows a pattern
of firings and resignations
of high -
level female museum workers, from Laura Raicovich at the Queens Museum to, most recently, Helen Molesworth at the Museum
of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles.
(Note in Curry's 2011 «Reasoning
About Climate
Uncertainty» Curry does countenance the possibility
of two opposing arguments each backed with a «
high confidence
level», so there are potentially two trees, and one
of which Curry insists is the wrong one.)
My concern
about the last paragraph above is related to the
high level of uncertainty in regional climate predictions.
What is clear is that uncontrolled emissions will very soon put us in range
of temperatures that have been unseen since the Eemian / Stage 5e period (
about 120,000 years ago) when temperatures may have been a degree or so warmer than now but where sea
level was 4 to 6m
higher (see this recent discussion the possible sensitivities
of the ice sheets to warming and the large
uncertainties involved).
The state
of our knowledge
about future climate change is such that the degree
of uncertainty and the
level of ignorance precludes formulating a PDF
of outcomes, or even putting bounds on the outcomes with a
high confidence
level.
I agree that the application
of higher resolution model equipment does not help to reduce the
uncertainty range
of the sea
level in the Amsterdam harbours: assumptions
about changes in the heat storage, icecap melting and changes in the gravity field dominate this
uncertainty range (although some regiona features related to oceanic circulation and heat redistribution may be better resolved in
higher resolution models).
When you argue that nations such as the United States or states, regional, or local governments, businesses, organizations, or individuals that emit
high levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) need not reduce their ghg emissions to their fair share
of safe global emissions because
of scientific
uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts:
When you argue that a nation emitting
high levels of ghgs need not adopt climate change policies because there is scientific
uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts, are you arguing that a nation need not take action on climate change until scientific
uncertainties are resolved given that waiting to resolve all scientific
uncertainties before action is taken may very likely make it too late to prevent catastrophic climate change harms to millions
of people around the world?
Quantitative estimates
of future rates
of sea
level rise are highly uncertain (independent
of any
uncertainties about future emissions), and the assessments have over-hyped the
high estimates
The shading indicates a measure
of uncertainty about future sea
level for two different scenarios — a low emissions scenario where carbon emissions are rapidly cut (blue RCP 2.6) and a
high emissions scenario with no carbon cuts (red RCP 8.5).
Based on our assessment, we have very
high confidence for climate impacts (especially sea
level rise and storm surge) on ecosystems; and we have
high confidence for climate impacts on agriculture (reduced to some degree, compared to our
level of confidence
about ecosystems, by
uncertainty about the efficacy and implementation
of adaptation options).
Simply improving messaging in accordance with recommendations
of psychologists or following the recommendations
of economists to create economic incentives to engage in less GHG producing behavior will not likely create strong citizen support for climate change policies unless citizens better understand that the narrative created by opponents
of climate change policies
about high levels of scientific
uncertainty and unacceptable harm to the economy from the adoption
of climate policies is not only false but has been manufactured by fossil fuel companies and other entities which have economic interests in continuing
high levels of fossil fuel consumption.
However, at the moment,
uncertainty about how factors such as low wind speeds,
high levels of turbulence, noise, visual impact, and animal strikes influence the performance
of micro wind turbines make it hard to determine their true potential in this form.
Such solecisms throughout the IPCC's assessment reports (including the insertion, after the scientists had completed their final draft,
of a table in which four decimal points had been right - shifted so as to multiply tenfold the observed contribution
of ice - sheets and glaciers to sea -
level rise), combined with a heavy reliance upon computer models unskilled even in short - term projection, with initial values
of key variables unmeasurable and unknown, with advancement
of multiple, untestable, non-Popper-falsifiable theories, with a quantitative assignment
of unduly
high statistical confidence
levels to non-quantitative statements that are ineluctably subject to very large
uncertainties, and, above all, with the now - prolonged failure
of TS to rise as predicted (Figures 1, 2), raise questions
about the reliability and hence policy - relevance
of the IPCC's central projections.