Sentences with phrase «high negative parenting»

Simple slope tests with a cutoff of ± 2 SD indicated that in the condition of very high negative parenting (b = 0.00, t = 0.01, p >.05) or very low negative parenting (b = − 0.00, t = − 0.11, p >.05), A1 allele was also not related to depressive symptoms at T3.

Not exact matches

For example, my parents who have a very low income also own a primary residence which have a high value (which by the way has negative cash flows and is in dire need of renovation.)

• When both parents are depressed and the depressed father spends medium / high amounts of time caring for his infant, his depression has been found to exacerbate the negative effects of mothers» depression (Mezulis et al, 2004).

Bunting (2005) found health visitors perceiving the needs of both teenage mothers and their partners as high, the young mothers» parenting capacity as average to good, the young fathers» parenting capacity as poor, and decreases in couple / paternal contact as being due to negative characteristics in the fathers.

Since children who have high levels of negative emotionality or self - regulatory problems present greater challenges to parents than other children, it may be especially difficult to provide optimal care for them.

Studies showing the influence of child temperament upon parenting suggest that children who have high levels of negative emotionality or self - regulatory difficulties are more difficult to parent than other children.

These characterizations would be combined through a statistical method known as latent profile analysis to determine Kim's four parenting profiles: Those scoring highest on the positive dimensions were labeled «supportive;» those scoring low on both dimensions were deemed «easygoing;» «harsh» parents were high on negative attributes and low on positive ones, and «tiger» parents scored high on both positive and negative dimensions.

While father absence has been associated with a host of negative children's outcomes, including increased risk of dropping out of school and lower educational attainment, poorer physical and mental health, and behavioural problems,36 - 40 higher levels of involvement by nonresident fathers may assuage the negative effects of father absence on children's outcomes.41, 42 Quality of the parents» relationship before divorce, or of the pre-divorce father / child relationship, can also be an important factor: children fare worse following divorce when pre-divorce relationships were good and fare better when pre-divorce relationships were poor, 43,44 suggesting children are sometimes better off without a father if the father's relationship to the child or the mother was not good.

Although some parents noted that the materials used in its construction is not of a higher quality, the price tag is on the low side to consider that a negative factor.

Although parents did rate their adoptive children higher in negative traits and behaviors like arrogance and stealing, they scored both adopted and biological children similarly when it came to positive traits like conscientiousness and persistence.

al (2002) hypothesized that among high - risk individuals (or people whose mothers were diagnosed with schizophrenia), individuals who had experienced negative relationships with their parents would be more likely to develop schizophrenia as an adult.

Parents cited high test scores as evidence that charter kids were shedding negative expectations and conceiving of academic progress as inevitable.

The study of 600 teachers, conducted by Abacus Associates for the Connecticut Education Association, underscores mounting concerns by legislators, educators, parents, and others about the test's validity, fairness, and negative impact on students — particularly those in high - poverty districts and those with limited access to computers.

Caveats aside, the negative achievement outcomes of voucher programs uncovered by recent studies have not deterred the Trump administration; 7 its stance on vouchers exemplifies a larger tendency to a dismiss evidence that does not align with the administration's priorities.8 This dismissal of evidence plays an unfortunate role in both undermining the nation's public schools and confusing parents who seek access to high - quality public school options.

«We focus on making high - quality supplements that are convenient,» says Dale Metz, director of the companion animal business unit at Vets Plus, Inc. «Giving treats is a way we show our love for our pets, and pilling is often a negative experience for pet and parent.

When you combine those with some of the negative comments that you hear when you're trying to be a mom or parenting or trying to show up for a school fundraiser, those sorts of things, and those things start to wear on you because there is such high expectation on you and every role that you're serving in.

Critically ill children hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) are especially vulnerable to a multitude of short - and long - term, negative emotional, behavioral, and academic outcomes, including a higher risk of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a greater need for psychiatric treatment, compared with matched hospitalized children who do not require intensive care.3 In addition, the parents of these children are at risk for the development of PTSD, as well as other negative emotional outcomes (eg, depression and anxiety disorders).4 — 6

The higher risk for maternal postpartum depression is also associated with reduced parenting skills, which may have negative consequences for the development of the child.28 — 30 Parents of obese children may lack effective parenting skills providing both a consistent structured frame and emotional support.31 In women with GDM, psychosocial vulnerability including low levels of social and family networks is associated with more adverse neonatal outcomes, especially increased birth weight.32 Thus, there is a tight interaction between maternal lifestyle, weight status, mental health, social support as well as between maternal and child's overall health.

An Introduction to Child Maltreatment: A Five - Unit Lesson Plan for Teachers of Psychology in Secondary Schools American Psychological Association (2001) Provides lessons that can be used in high school psychology, health, and sex education classes to prevent child abuse and neglect by educating future parents about the impact of negative parenting behaviors on child development.

For instance, federal data show that children raised by single parents account for the great majority of high - school dropouts, illegal drug use, institutionalized juveniles and teen suicides, among many other negative impacts.

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

Since children who have high levels of negative emotionality or self - regulatory problems present greater challenges to parents than other children, it may be especially difficult to provide optimal care for them.

3) Mothers» emotional communication was related to the degree to which children displayed positive affect with peers: Mothers who were low in derisive humor, criticality and intrusiveness had children whose peer interaction tended to have higher levels of laughter and joy than mothers who were higher in these negative parenting behaviors.

Compared with control children, they had more difficulties with friendships, 29 poorer theory of mind, 16 difficulties labelling and understanding the causes of common emotions, 16 increased fantasy proneness and difficulty distinguishing fantasy and reality, 31 increased negative attributional style, dysfunctional attitudes, rumination and self - criticism.32 They also experience difficulties in the mother — child relationship, with four studies reporting high levels of disrupted attachment styles, 21, 29, 31, 32 and in role - play scenarios elevated levels of role - reversal with parents, fear of abandonment, and negative expectations of parents.31 These factors are known to put children at risk of poor mental health outcomes, and indeed, this appears to be the case.

Similar findings were obtained in a study of foster care breakdown, noting a high correlation between placement breakdown and the service provider having a negative relationship with the foster parents (Pardeck, 1985).

Secondly, if family financial resources are not made available for the welfare of all family members in a way that is perceived as fair to both parents, and that maintains as high a level of financial well - being for all family members as possible, children are at risk for negative outcomes.

The current findings demonstrated that only a minority (32 %) of US adolescents 10 to 14 years of age reported full R - rated movie restrictions, which is consistent with earlier regional reports.18, — , 20,22 In investigating how the interplay between adolescents» sensation seeking and parental R - rated movie restrictions might explain smoking onset, we found that adolescents with lower levels of sensation seeking27 and those who reported R - rated movie restrictions were at lower risk for trying smoking.18, — , 23 The results also revealed negative associations between adolescents» levels of sensation seeking and later R - rated movie restrictions, which indicates that sensation - seeking adolescents are at higher risk for starting to smoke not only directly but also indirectly through changes in parenting.

Specifically, negative emotional reactivity has been found to predict both internalizing problems (e.g., anxiety, depression) and externalizing problems (e.g., aggression, rule - breaking).1 Fearfulness predicts internalizing problems, and self - regulation difficulties predict externalizing problems.1 The large literature on parenting2 generally shows that high levels of warm and firm parenting are associated with positive child development.4

Although high - quality day care may buffer the negative effect of parental insensitivity in some cases, the security of child - parent attachment is primarily guided by the sensitivity of maternal care.

With respect to time perspective, individuals with high levels in the dark traits, especially Machiavellianism and psychopathy, should display a past negative outlook since they report having a negative parent - child relationship and family functioning (Láng & Lénárd, 2015).

Studies showing the influence of child temperament upon parenting suggest that children who have high levels of negative emotionality or self - regulatory difficulties are more difficult to parent than other children.

The negative impact of poverty on parents» involvement in extracurricular activities may be especially strong in the United States, which has higher levels of extreme poverty than other developed nations, suggests Virginia Rutter, a sociologist at Framingham State University and a Senior Scholar at the Council on Contemporary Families.

Chances are high that impulsive, reactive behavior of one member of the parent — child dyad is responded to by impulsive behavior of the other, leading to a vicious circle of negative reactivity.

It has also been associated with many negative outcomes for children, including higher rates of mental health issues, as well as low self - esteem (see About Education and Parenting Science for more details on studies).

Early behavioural research pointed to the negative impact of «coercive» parenting practices in escalating negative child behaviours (Patterson 1989), and more recent research has shown that positive, proactive parenting (involving praise, encouragement and affection) is strongly associated with high child self - esteem, cognitive ability and social and academic competence, and is protective against later disruptive behaviour and substance misuse (Kumpfer 2004; Byford 2012).

For other health outcomes, associations were such that the odds of children experiencing highly negative parenting (conflict and smacking) having poor health were 1.3 to 2.2 times higher than those for children with low levels of negative parenting.

Parents of children with conduct disorder typically rely on inconsistent coercion, rather than reinforcement, in a family climate high in negative exchanges.

That is, parent - rated negative emotionality in preschoolers was associated with lower observed and self - reported supportive coparenting only in families reporting higher levels of postnatal marital adjustment.

I couldn't agree more with the statement on your web site «When we speak of high conflict separation however, we are talking about angry parents who get caught up in high conflict litigations, not realizing the negative impact it has on the entire family, especially the children, who suffer life long psychological damage.»

Immediate post-treatment factors predicting negative outcomes (delinquent acts) were maternal reports of behavior problems and observed mother — child coercion, indicating that in families where levels of parent - child coercion are still high post-treatment, further intervention may be warranted to prevent future problems.

In the one previous study that has examined emotion - related parenting behavior, mothers» frequency of communication about negative emotions was found to be inversely related to conduct problem severity in children with high levels of CU traits [29].

First, Belsky et al. (1996) reported that coparents of the subgroup of boys who had become less behaviorally inhibited at 3 years than expected (from their reactivity in infancy) showed the highest level of observed unsupportive coparenting, whereas coparents of boys who had become more inhibited than expected showed the lowest levels of unsupportive behavior (note that in the same sample, higher levels of negative parenting of the father also predicted less behavior inhibition in boys; Park et al. 1997).

Of course, this body of research does not really explain why certain behaviours are problematic or stressors for parents and families.2 Moreover, parent distress may be the antecedent rather than the outcome of child behaviour problems: High parent distress is associated with less optimal parenting and more negative parent - child interaction which, in turn, predicts child behaviour problems.

In general, children high in frustration, impulsivity and low in effortful control are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of negative parenting, while in turn, many negative parenting behaviors predict increases in these characteristics.

Several parenting variables included both positive and negative aspects of support, such as «parental acceptance» (low scores reflect rejection and high scores reflect acceptance) and «parental care» (low scores reflect parental neglect and rejection and high scores reflect warmth and understanding).

Regarding the negative aspects of parental emotion socialization, higher levels of parents» dismissing of child emotion — as directly observed during family emotional conversations — have demonstrated relationships with elevated behavioral problems [37].

With respect to negative parenting, Healthy Families mothers in the High Prevention Opportunity subgroup were less likely than their counterparts in the control group to use harsh parenting, while no differences were detected for the Limited Prevention Opportunity subgroup.

Intervention mothers had lower scores on both harsh / negative parenting and ineffective parenting and higher scores on supportive parenting.

While the aforementioned body of work indicates that children with high CU traits experience more negative parenting and poorer quality parent — child relationships, what is less understood, however, are the specific ways in which parents socialize such children about emotions.

Megan distinguishes between a situational aspect of divorce, where parents under high stress exhibit negative behaviors, and that of divorces that involve Personality Divorces, False Allegations, and potentially toxic levels of Parental Alienation.