Sentences with phrase «high peaks of power»

While Apple does not refute what was found, it says that the reason for the power management and CPU throttling results identified by Poole and other Geekbench users is simply a case of it trying to smooth out high peaks of power draw in an attempt to prevent iPhones with older batteries from shutting down unexpectedly.

Not exact matches

We expect profit margins to peak toward the end of 2015 as labor regains pricing power and borrowing costs move higher.
In the late 1990s, the stampede of the internet powered the Nasdaq to its 2000 peak; it took 15 years for that high to be surpassed (2015).
While CO2 laser radiation is unable to generate codes on uncoated beverage cans due to its reflection off metal surfaces, the latest fibre laser systems are perfectly suited for these type of applications: thanks to their high pulse peak power they can code bare aluminium, as well as coated or anodised aluminium, leaving an indelible mark by anodising the surface (a process that does not engrave but actually creates a protective layer on the aluminium).
These speakers have an impressive 500 W peak power handling and 250 W RMS power for the kind of high - excursion you crave.
Listen to this: This is a high - powered inverter with a peak output of 3,200 watts.
Given the right financial incentives, though, many households may accept smart grid strategies that let utilities reduce power consumption in homes at peak periods of demand, when wholesale electricity prices are highest, some analysts conclude.
The result is that you can use large amounts of energy at night to heat up the thermal mass of the building, after which you can turn off the heating altogether in the morning peak and during the daytime, when the total power consumption and energy price are at their highest.
Particulate emissions peak in the middle of the workweek because that is when there is more traffic and higher demand for electric power, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
The next peak cycle of sunspot activity is predicted for 2012 - 2014, bringing with it a greater risk of large geomagnetic storms that can generate powerful rogue currents in transmission lines, potentially damaging or destroying the large transformers that manage power flow over high - voltage networks.
Plus, the power draw at that peak load is much higher and the amount of time spent in that mode is much greater than on a standard PC.»
Then a ground - based laser array with a combined capacity of 100 gigawatts of peak power, spread out over a dry, high - altitude site like Chile's Atacama Desert, would zap each sail, one at a time, for a few minutes.
The wrinkle of mountains that runs the length of New Guinea, with peaks as high as 15,000 feet, testifies to the power of the collision.
Dr. John Garhammer — brilliant mind, with a terrific understanding of Newtonian mechanics, physics and mathematics and a great deal of experience in training athletes, from Olympic weightlifters to throwers — addressed the important similarities in terms of peak power output (a derivative of absolute strength) and rate of force development between Olympic weightlifters, high jumpers, and throwers.
# 3 Lifting: Snatch and snatch variation — hang snatch, power snatch, snatch pulls and high pulls — seem to provide a better chance of increasing peak vertical bar velocity, a distinctive feature that ultimately reflects the ability to generate and apply force over a longer period of time (special strength training).
The jump shrug displays highest peak power outputs, peak velocity, peak joint angular velocities, peak vertical displacement, and peak landing forces with low loads (30 — 40 % of 1RM hang power clean).
The high pull and hang high pull displays the highest peak velocity with low loads (30 % of 1RM hang power clean), the highest force with high loads (80 % of 1RM hang power clean), and the highest peak power with moderate loads (45 % of 1RM hang power clean).
Comparing the hang clean, jump shrug, and high pull, Suchomel et al. (2014a; 2015d) found that the jump shrug produced greater peak power output, peak GRF, and peak velocity than either the hang clean or the high pull, although the force - time curves are similar across the first 80 % of the movement (Suchomel et al. 2015d).
Comparing the hang power clean, jump shrug, and high pull, Suchomel et al. (2014a; 2015d) found that the jump shrug produced greater peak power output, peak GRF, and peak velocity than either the hang clean or the high pull, although the force - time curves are similar across the first 80 % of the movement (Suchomel et al. 2015d).
They found that peak power, peak bar velocity, and maximum bar displacement occurred with the lowest load tested (40 % of 1RM power clean) while peak force and impulse occurred with the highest load tested (140 % of 1RM power clean).
Peak GRF is routinely always greatest with the heaviest load (80 — 90 % of 1RM), while peak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extPeak GRF is routinely always greatest with the heaviest load (80 — 90 % of 1RM), while peak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extpeak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extent.
They found that the high pull displayed its greatest peak power output with 45 % of 1RM hang clean.
Such was the case of an excellent series of studies by Prof. Paul Laursen and colleagues, who demonstrated how four weeks of high - intensity interval training, performed twice per week, increased VO2max, peak cycling power, and 40 km time - trial performance in a group of highly trained cyclists.
Because pension formulas are typically based on the employee's highest three or five years of salary, they should try to do everything in their power to make their peak earning years count.
Power Pack 1, which will be available starting August 1 at a price of $ 539, includes a K&N high - flow air filter and nets peak gains of 13 hp and 16 lb - ft of torque over the stock GT's 435 hp and 400 lb - ft.
Part of the issue is perceived power, because the direct - injection 2.0 - liter four - cylinder delivers its peak torque of 146 pounds - feet at a relatively high 4,450 rpm.
It uses the same EA888 2 - litre, four - cylinder turbo unit that powers all high performance Golfs, tweaked here to deliver its peak output between 5800 - 6500rpm, with 280 lb ft of torque available from 1850 - 5700rpm.
Unlike internal combustion engines that need oxygen to produce power (something that's pretty rare at the high altitude of the Pikes Peak course), electric motors don't have to breathe and will make the same power at any height.
At 217bhp it develops 20bhp more than before (and 2bhp more than the Juke), at 6050rpm — a scant 50rpm higher than the power peak of the Clio 200.
A $ 19,500 sport package (which, along with $ 14,000 worth of optional carbon - fiber accents, was on the car we tested) includes reprogrammed power - management controls that allow higher peak torque (295 lb - ft instead of 273) and reduce the 0 - to -60-mph time from the 4.7 seconds we measured in a prototype two years ago to 4.3 seconds in the Roadster 2.0.
Thanks chiefly to a redesigned and larger intake manifold, peak power is up from 568bhp to 595bhp at 7000rpm, and although there's the same 465 lb ft of torque at the same 5500rpm, more of it is available at lower revs, engineering a little more life into the throttle response at medium revs to complement the harder punch higher up.
Peak power from the quad - cam V8 rises from 483bhp to 503bhp, the increase due to a revised carbonfibre intake system being fed more air, modified pistons that feature re-profiled crowns, a higher compression ratio (up from 11.3:1 to 11.75:1), and a lightweight sports exhaust system with a single silencer and tailpipes repositioned to keep them out of the revised underbody airflow.
But when you're driving the Explorer with its turbo - four on one of those winding roads that lead to the campground, lake, or trailhead, this engine struggles a bit, caught between relatively high rpm peaks for power and torque and only six speeds to get there.
The new turbocharged engine combines the best of both worlds — reaching a maximum 7,600 rpm, it is unusually high - revving for a turbocharged engine, resulting in linear power delivery over a wide engine speed range and a soulful engine note, while M TwinPower Turbo technology ensures that peak torque is on top over a broad rpm range.
I've always been a fan of high - revving engines that make power up at the top of the rev range, and that's the case with this 3.5 - liter V6 with peak power coming at 6,400 rpm.
Powered by a high - output version of the Twin Power Turbo in - line six - cylinder engine with twin low - mass turbochargers and high precision direct injection, output is increased to 335 hp with a peak torque of 332 lb - ft, allowing the 35is to sprint to 100 km / h in just 4.7 seconds.
Peak power of a traction engine occurs at a rotational speed higher than the speed when torque is maximised and at or below the maximum rated rotational speed — Max RPM.
The under - the - hood specifications of Chevrolet Sail, its petrol version is powered with a 1.2 litre Smartech engine that churns out peak power of 85 bhp and maximum torque delivery of 113 Nm, whereas the diesel Sail is powered with a 1.3 litre SDE Smartech power - mill rated with the highest power and torque figures of 77 bhp and 205 Nm, respectively.
New powertrains, high on features and safety Tata Motors has plonked in two indigenously developed engines into the Nexon, with a 1.2 - litre three - cylinder turbocharged petrol from its Revotron series, which is rated to develop 110bhp of power and 170Nm of peak torque.
From a stop the 3.7 L V6 generates linear acceleration, but its peak power doesn't kick in until high in the rev range with peak torque coming online at 5,200 rpm and the last bit of horsepower at 7,000 rpm.
Power delivery continues to build up high in the rev range and reaches a peak of 450 hp (up 43 hp over the E70) at 5,500 rpm to 6,000 rpm, so the engine feels very similar to a large normally - aspirated engine.
The Leaf Nismo RC is powered by a high - response 80kW AC synchronous motor that delivers a total of 107 HP and a peak torque of 207 lbs - ft.
The 1.0 - liter EcoBoost cylinder block can fit onto a sheet of A4 paper (11.7 x 8.3 inches) but delivers up to 125 PS and 170 N · m (125 lb - ft) peak torque (with 200 N · m (148 lb - ft) overboost), giving it the highest power density of any Ford production engine to date.
The new BMW 120i Coupé is powered by a 2.0 - liter four - cylinder with BMW High Precision Injection (direct gasoline injection) developing 125 kW (170 hp) at 6,700 rpm and peak torque of 210 N · m (155 lb - ft) at 4,250 rpm, accelerating the BMW 120i Coupé from zero to 100 km / h in 7.8 seconds and offering a top speed of 224 km / h or 149 mph.
Yes, there's turbo lag below 2000rpm (quite a lot of it, in fact, despite peak torque arriving from 1900rpm), but above 3000rpm the response is crisp, and although peak power comes in at 6500rpm, a full 1000rpm before the redline, it's worth hanging on to a lower gear to make the most of the high - end response.
The lineup includes the HD 220 with 700 N · m (516 lb - ft) of peak torque and 220 kW of peak power; the HD 950T with 950 N · m (701 lb - ft) of peak torque and 140 kW of peak power; and the HD 250 which is a high - voltage variant with 250 kW of peak power and 900 N · m (664 lb - ft) of peak torque.
Powering the top - of - the - range 535i Touring, the petrol engine was first introduced in Australia in the 5 Series Gran Turismo and combines High Precision Injection and fully variable VALVETRONIC valve control to produce a maximum output of 225kW at 5800rpm and peak torque of 400Nm from a low 1200rpm right through to 5000rpm.
Peak power is developed relatively high in the rev range, with 221 horsepower at 6,250 rpm, nearly at the 6,650 redline, and 205 pound - feet of torque at 4,800 rpm, so it has to work hard for maximum acceleration, as when merging into fast highway traffic.
For those of you who still don't know, the M5 is powered by a high - revving 4.4 - liter V8 engine with an M TwinPower Turbo package that delivers an impressive 560 hp at 6,000 — 7,000 rpm and a peak torque of 502 lb - ft from 1,500 rpm.
BMW X5 has received a new petrol variant to the line - up dubbed - xDrive 35i, powered by the high capacity 3.0 litre, in - line, six cylinder engine making 302bhp of top power and 400Nm of peak torque between 1200rpm to 5000rpm.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z