For example, charter public schools in Colorado have outperformed other public schools in nearly every area while serving
high percentages of minority students in traditionally urban areas.
In the past few years, charter public schools in Colorado have outperformed comparable public schools in nearly every area, while serving
high percentages of minority students in urban areas.
Not exact matches
We chose three urban districts with
high percentages of minority and low - income
students (at least 60 percent on both counts)
in each region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West).
Despite serving a substantially greater proportion
of students from low - income families and
minorities than district schools, a
higher percentage of CMU schools (86 percent) made AYP
in 2010 - 11 than did public schools statewide (79 percent).
Moreover, this «diversity - gap» between
students and teachers tends to be wider
in areas where
percentages of minority students are
higher.
This comparison is likely to generate misleading conclusions for one simple reason, as the authors themselves point out on the first page
of the executive summary and then again on page 57
of the full report: «the concentration
of charter schools
in urban areas skews the charter school enrollment towards having
higher percentages of poor and
minority students.»
The school characteristics include whether it is
in an urban area, grade level (e.g.,
high school), the number
of students enrolled,
student - teacher ratio, the
percentage of students who are eligible for the free or reduced - price lunch program, the
percentage of minority students, and measures
of student achievement
in reading and math.
Approximately 95 percent
of CSGF's member schools enable
students to outperform comparable district schools
in both math and reading; nearly 70 percent
of schools enable their
students to outperform state averages
in both math and reading, although they serve much
higher than average
percentages of low - income and
minority students.
And more than one - third
of the studentsare
minorities — the
highest percentage of such
students onany campus
in the state.
Uncertified teachers, teaching fellows, and TFA corps members all tend to teach
in schools that, relative to those employing more certified teachers, have a
higher percentage of minority students; more low - income, ESL, and special - education
students; and
students with lower achievement levels.
In fact, compared to district schools nationally, charter schools enroll a
higher percentage of low - income and
minority students.
These five schools were located
in neighborhoods with some
of the
highest retention rates
in the city (after the promotion policy took effect), and they had large
percentages of minority and poor
students.
Over the last several years, charter public schools
in Colorado have outperformed comparable public schools
in nearly every area, while serving
high percentages of minority students.
The data, part
of the benchmark test known as the National Assessment
of Educational Progress, show that New York City fourth graders have made progress
in closing the gap between their scores and the state and national results
in reading, despite the
higher percentages of poor and
minority students in the city.
Since 1989, increasingly
higher shares
of black
students in Northern Virginia enrolled
in predominantly
minority and intensely segregated schools, though at much lower
percentages than
in other metros
in the state.
This discovery was highlighted
in a StudentsFirstNY report released last month that examined the distribution
of teacher quality across NYC and found that
students in schools with
high poverty or
percentages of minority students were more likely to have teachers rated «Unsatisfactory.»
This makes the new goal set by the major charter school networks, to grade themselves on the
percentage of their
students who go on to earn four - year college degrees
in six years, all the more radical — especially given the fact that these networks educate low - income,
minority students, whose college graduation rates pale
in comparison to their more affluent white peers — a mere 9 percent earning degrees within six years, compared with 77 percent
of students from
high - income families as
of 2015.
Higher percentages of charter school
students of every race attend predominantly
minority schools (50 - 100 %
minority students) or racially isolated
minority schools (90 - 100 %
minority students) than do their same - race peers
in traditional public schools.
As noted
in the 2015 Texas Equity Plan, «schools with
high concentrations
of minority students and
students living
in poverty have
higher percentages of inexperienced teachers than schools with low concentrations
of those
students.
In some states, charter schools serve significantly
higher percentages of minority or low — income
students than the traditional public schools.
The state leads the nation
in the
percentage of students graduating from
high school, and
in high school graduation rates among
minority students.
More than 1.2 million
students in the United States and Canada drop out
of high school each year (with the
percentages skewed toward males, low - income and
minority students).
Social relations between
students in interracial schools may affect
minority students» academic achievement or later occupational success (Schofield, 1991), meaning they could have jobs where there are a
higher percentage of whites or have a job that pays more than.