However, when one looks at the Census data for those two towns it is apparent that Salem has
a higher percentage of students living in poverty and higher percentages of children eligible for free lunch and that Harrison has more students eligible for reduced lunch.
Expectations have been raised, the student population has grown to more than 24,000 and
a higher percentage of students live in or near poverty.
Not exact matches
In WILTW May 26, 2016, we pointed out that more Americans in the 18 to 34 - year old age group were more likely to be
living with their parents (32.1 %), the
highest percentage since the 1930s, as opposed to
living with their spouse or partner in a separate household (31.6 %)-- the unfortunate result
of too little
high - wage job creation and too much
student loan debt.
These include a relatively standard set
of student and family demographics: an indicator for whether anyone in the family received free or reduced - price meals at school in the past year, the family's income as a
percentage of the federal poverty line, whether the child was born in the United States, whether the child
lives with a single mother, and the
highest level
of education either parent has attained.
Buckskin says that's not surprising, given that «a disproportionate
percentage of our people are
living in low SES locations with
high unemployment... experiencing the detrimental effects
of poverty» and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander teachers have a strong sense
of community and commitment to making the schooling
of Indigenous
students more culturally appropriate.
But
students at both ends
of the spectrum — that is, with either
high or low grades — were significantly (about 2 to 4
percentage points) more likely to attend college in 1993 - 94 when they
lived in a state with minimum - competency exams.
Unfortunately, over the past 20 years, there has been a significant decline in the
percentage of high school
students who find school to be meaningful and interesting and in the
percentage who view school learning as important to their future
lives.
But
high percentages of principals work with
students who are experiencing family or personal crisis (95 percent), in need
of mental health services (91 percent),
living in poverty (90 percent), coming to school hungry (85 percent), and in need
of health care services (82 percent).
But boundary participation rates, or the
percentage of public school
students who attend the in - boundary school for the neighborhood where they
live, vary widely across the city and are extremely
high in several adjoining neighborhoods.
As noted in the 2015 Texas Equity Plan, «schools with
high concentrations
of minority
students and
students living in poverty have
higher percentages of inexperienced teachers than schools with low concentrations
of those
students.
In 2012, one
of my graduate
students and I explored this question using data
of 191
high schools in Connecticut and found that multiple linear regressions revealed that 69 %
of the difference (variance) in a school's average
student achievement can be explained by the
percentage of students living in poverty.
«We have a much lower
percentage of students living at home and a
higher percentage coming from abroad.»