Sentences with phrase «higher anxiety scores»

21 % had higher anxiety scores, and 17 % scored < 24 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Low oxytocin levels were linked to higher anxiety scores.

In these subjects, high anxiety scores were associated with female gender, poverty, and problems with immigration officials.

Not exact matches

Challenge Success believes that our increasingly competitive world has led to tremendous anxiety about our children's» futures and has resulted in a high pressure, myopic focus on grades, test scores and performance.

The results reinforce earlier studies which have found that children who are spanked have lower IQ scores and that frequent spanking has been linked to anxiety and behavior problems and higher risk of violent or criminal behavior, depression and excessive alcohol use.

Three - quarters of those assessed scored 19 or higher on the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS), indicating dental phobia.

According to the study results higher anxiety and anger scores, depression and caregiver stress were associated with increased risk of CAC greater than 100 units (moderate to severe disease) in patients with RA.

Specifically, MP significantly increased scores on self - reports (averaged measures), and the effects differed between groups, with controls reporting a more robust «high» (drug effect: F = 92, P = 0.0001; interaction: F = 6.2, P = 0.02), «restlessness» (F = 35, P = 0.0001; interaction: F = 5.8, P = 0.02), «anxiety» (F = 7, P = 0.01; interaction: F = 5.8, P = 0.02), and «drug effects» (F = 100, P = 0.0001; interaction F = 4, P = 0.05) than marijuana abusers.

This means that saffron could potentially be used in place tryptophan or 5 - HTP if you score high on the low serotonin section of the amino acid questionnaire (anxiety, worry - in - the head, obsessiveness, negativity and depression, irritability, PMS, afternoon and evening cravings and insomnia) and yet do not seem to benefit from either of these two amino acids.

meeting the FA [food addiction] criterion had significantly higher depression, anxiety, and stress scores as compared to participants who did not meet the FA [food addiction] criterion.

Separation anxiety poses a problem for two co-dependent high - school seniors who hope to score booze and babes at a party.

Test - Stressed Out: Strategies for Improving Attitudes, Scores Whether it is simple butterflies or a severe case of «test anxiety,» students can feel overwhelming pressure to succeed on high - stakes tests.

As the authors of the meta - analysis point out, there are many known, malleable predictors of achievement test scores that have much higher associations with achievement than measures of grit, e.g., study skills, test anxiety, and learning strategies.

This meta - analysis of social and emotional learning interventions (including 213 school - based SEL programs and 270,000 students from rural, suburban and urban areas) showed that social and emotional learning interventions had the following effects on students ages 5 - 18: decreased emotional distress such as anxiety and depression, improved social and emotional skills (e.g., self - awareness, self - management, etc.), improved attitudes about self, others, and school (including higher academic motivation, stronger bonding with school and teachers, and more positive attitudes about school), improvement in prosocial school and classroom behavior (e.g., following classroom rules), decreased classroom misbehavior and aggression, and improved academic performance (e.g. standardized achievement test scores).

The study authors reported that students in the intervention group had higher math scores than students in the comparison group, but only for students of parents with high math anxiety.

Students enrolled in WINGS for kids after school program have significantly higher math & reading scores, better grades, improved school attendance, and reported higher self - esteem and less anxiety than non-WINGS students.

The higher your score, the more likely you are to be distressed, and possibly experiencing anxiety and / or depression.

The range of the scores for each scale is 0 - 21 points, with higher scores indicating more adverse symptoms (i.e., higher symptoms of anxiety and depression)[20][21].

The pre — post effect size (d) was 0.95, and pre — follow - up was 1.08, comparable to effect sizes published investigating face - to - face mindfulness interventions for depressive symptoms in those with diabetes, PTSD and cancer15, 56, 57 and online cognitive therapy interventions for depressive symptoms in a moderately depressed sample.27, 36 The change in PHQ - 9 is higher than effect sizes found for IAPT depression and anxiety treatment where follow - up was at 4 and 8 months (0.46 and 0.63, respectively) 3 where the IAPT sample started with higher baseline depression scores.

Higher scores on the State Anxiety Inventory, 19 the Profile of Mood States, 20 and the Parental Stressor Scale: PICU21 are indicative of greater state anxiety, negative mood state, and parental Anxiety Inventory, 19 the Profile of Mood States, 20 and the Parental Stressor Scale: PICU21 are indicative of greater state anxiety, negative mood state, and parental anxiety, negative mood state, and parental stress.

Each item is scored from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

Researchers found higher implicit and explicit anxiety in socially anxious participants (compared with controls) before treatment, and reductions in the IAT - Anxiety and SPAI scores of socially anxious participants after treatment (Gamer et al.,anxiety in socially anxious participants (compared with controls) before treatment, and reductions in the IAT - Anxiety and SPAI scores of socially anxious participants after treatment (Gamer et al.,Anxiety and SPAI scores of socially anxious participants after treatment (Gamer et al., 2008).

The HADS has well established clinical cut - off scores with a score higher than 7 indicating elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression and a score higher than 10 indicating anxiety or depression in the clinically significant range.

Adolescents at high risk for addiction (n = 1210) were defined as students with baseline scores 1 SD above the school mean on one of the four subscales of the Substance Use Risk Profile Scale (anxiety sensitivity, hopelessness, impulsivity and sensation seeking); low - risk adolescents (n = 1433) did not meet these criteria.

The scores of both the severe and mild Health anxiety and the DSM - IV Hypochondriasis patients were statistically significantly higher than the scores for the patients with a well - defined medical condition according to the FPs at index consultation.

Five clusters were identified: a low scores cluster, a sleep problems cluster, a comorbidity cluster (high on all variables), a low mood cluster and a cluster with elevation on anxiety and depressed mood («distress»).

Higher scores indicate higher levels of depression, anxiety or sHigher scores indicate higher levels of depression, anxiety or shigher levels of depression, anxiety or stress.

Group differences in the Child Behavior Checklist scores showed that parents in the intervention group reported higher scores than those in the UC group on the aggressive behavior subscale (7.74 vs 6.80; adjusted β, 0.83 [95 % CI, 0.37 - 1.30]-RRB-, although neither group reached a subscale score of clinical significance (the cutoff for this age is 22 years)(Table 3).14 There were no group differences in reported sleep problems or problems with depression or anxiety.

Thus, the patients may actually have been reassured by their doctor, but the Health anxiety patients were only partially reassured as they continued to have much higher Health anxiety scores after the consultation than patients with a well - defined medical condition.

Negative outcomes (e.g. perceived stress, anxiety and depression) were predicted by high stressor, coping and conscientiousness scores, and low positive personality and social support scores.

A high parental symptom load was defined as having a score of 8 or above (recommended cut - off value) on at least one of the subscales (HADS - A and / or HADS - D).19 Three groups were identified according to whether no parent, one parent or both parents had a high anxiety or depression symptom load.

The items in each subscale were on a four - point scale ranging from «strongly disagree» (1) to «strongly agree» (4) yielding possible scores from seven to 28, with a higher score indicating a greater level of general anxiety and depression.

Methods We used logistic regression to estimate OR of benefit receipt for groups according to adolescent and parental anxiety and depression symptom load (high vs low symptom loads) and for a one point increase in the continuous SCL - 5 score (range 1 — 4).

Many of the scales demonstrated weak psychometrics in at least one of the following ways: (a) lack of psychometric data [i.e., reliability and / or validity; e.g., HFQ, MASC, PBS, Social Adjustment Scale - Self - Report (SAS - SR) and all perceived self - esteem and self - concept scales], (b) items that fall on more than one subscale (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version), (c) low alpha coefficients (e.g., below.60) for some subscales, which calls into question the utility of using these subscales in research and clinical work (e.g., HFQ, MMPI - A, CBCL - 1991 version, BASC, PSPCSAYC), (d) high correlations between subscales (e.g., PANAS - C), (e) lack of clarity regarding clinically - relevant cut - off scores, yielding high false positive and false negative rates (e.g., CES - D, CDI) and an inability to distinguish between minor (i.e., subclinical) and major (i.e., clinical) «cases» of a disorder (e.g., depression; CDI, BDI), (f) lack of correspondence between items and DSM criteria (e.g., CBCL - 1991 version, CDI, BDI, CES - D, (g) a factor structure that lacks clarity across studies (e.g., PSPCSAYC, CASI; although the factor structure is often difficult to assess in studies of pediatric populations, given the small sample sizes), (h) low inter-rater reliability for interview and observational methods (e.g., CGAS), (i) low correlations between respondents such as child, parent, teacher [e.g., BASC, PSPCSAYC, CSI, FSSC - R, SCARED, Connors Ratings Scales - Revised (CRS - R)-RSB-, (j) the inclusion of somatic or physical symptom items on mental health subscales (e.g., CBCL), which is a problem when conducting studies of children with pediatric physical conditions because physical symptoms may be a feature of the condition rather than an indicator of a mental health problem, (k) high correlations with measures of social desirability, which is particularly problematic for the self - related rating scales and for child - report scales more generally, and (l) content validity problems (e.g., the RCMAS is a measure of anxiety, but contains items that tap mood, attention, peer interactions, and impulsivity).

People high in attachment anxiety, those who desire intense closeness with a partner but fear rejection and are highly attentive to relationship threats, monitor their partners more closely on Facebook.4 In general, especially during young adulthood, women tend to score higher on attachment anxiety than do men.5 In our study, we found that attachment anxiety explained gender differences in partner monitoring in response to feelings of jealousy.

In contrast, high scores on the Security dimension and low scores on the Anxiety dimension were associated with the provision of more emotional care to mothers.

Patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI; score range, 0 - 63), 19 the trait (score range, 10 - 40) and anger expression (score range, 0 - 72) subscales of the State - Trait Anger Expression Inventory, 20 and the state subscale of the State - Trait Anxiety Inventory (score range, 20 - 80).21 Higher scores on all measures indicate greater symptom severity.

In 3319 children with ASD, those with ADHD had an increased risk of anxiety and mood disorders and higher autism severity scores.

At the beginning of the study, girls provided information regarding their attachment to their parent (higher scores indicate greater security), as well as their own relational security (items assessed comfort with closeness and anxiety about abandonment).

Higher scores translate higher levels of anxiety and depreHigher scores translate higher levels of anxiety and deprehigher levels of anxiety and depression.

High end - state functioning was defined as a PDS score below 14, a CAPS global severity rating below 2, and Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory scores below 12.29

Steinberg, in a review of authoritative parenting studies, reports that adolescents from homes where authoritative parenting is the norm achieve more in school, report less depression and anxiety, and tend to score higher on measures of self - reliance and self - esteem.

Antisocial children score high on traits of impulsiveness, but low on anxiety and reward - dependence — that is, the degree to which they value, and are motivated by, approval from others.

Preoccupied Attachment: If you scored in the «preoccupied attachment» quadrant it means you have a relatively high level of anxiety, but a low level of avoidance when it comes to intimate relationships.

It was found that those who score higher in social anxiety have a preference for online self - disclosure over face - to - face communication (McKenna et al. 2002).

Nurmi and von Wright [25] have already noticed that noise during learning impaired the subsequent recall performance of children with high neuroticism scores and with high score on state - anxiety.

Conversely, individuals with attachment anxiety score higher on the attachment anxiety dimension, (Mikulincer et al., 2003) display a preference for seeking acceptance from and proximity with others, fear rejection and abandonment, and have a negative self - image along with a positive other - image.

Higher scores indicate greater severity in depression, anxiety, or stress.

Higher scores were found for conflict behavior, according to parent ratings and for anxiety, according to teacher ratings.

However, almost all of the correlations were positive, indicating that residual gains on outcome measures were associated with higher rather than lower mean WAI - S scores, except in the relation between working alliance and anxiety.