Sentences with phrase «higher asset requirements»

Some lenders may require tax returns, some may have higher asset requirements, if it doesn't jive with you move on.

Not exact matches

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.

As a result, risky asset classes such as equities and commodities will be assigned much higher reserve requirements than bonds, which is why some insurance industry players are already dumping equities to hold a greater proportion of bonds.

Actual results, including with respect to our targets and prospects, could differ materially due to a number of factors, including the risk that we may not obtain sufficient orders to achieve our targeted revenues; price competition in key markets; the risk that we or our channel partners are not able to develop and expand customer bases and accurately anticipate demand from end customers, which can result in increased inventory and reduced orders as we experience wide fluctuations in supply and demand; the risk that our commercial Lighting Products results will continue to suffer if new issues arise regarding issues related to product quality for this business; the risk that we may experience production difficulties that preclude us from shipping sufficient quantities to meet customer orders or that result in higher production costs and lower margins; our ability to lower costs; the risk that our results will suffer if we are unable to balance fluctuations in customer demand and capacity, including bringing on additional capacity on a timely basis to meet customer demand; the risk that longer manufacturing lead times may cause customers to fulfill their orders with a competitor's products instead; the risk that the economic and political uncertainty caused by the proposed tariffs by the United States on Chinese goods, and any corresponding Chinese tariffs in response, may negatively impact demand for our products; product mix; risks associated with the ramp - up of production of our new products, and our entry into new business channels different from those in which we have historically operated; the risk that customers do not maintain their favorable perception of our brand and products, resulting in lower demand for our products; the risk that our products fail to perform or fail to meet customer requirements or expectations, resulting in significant additional costs, including costs associated with warranty returns or the potential recall of our products; ongoing uncertainty in global economic conditions, infrastructure development or customer demand that could negatively affect product demand, collectability of receivables and other related matters as consumers and businesses may defer purchases or payments, or default on payments; risks resulting from the concentration of our business among few customers, including the risk that customers may reduce or cancel orders or fail to honor purchase commitments; the risk that we are not able to enter into acceptable contractual arrangements with the significant customers of the acquired Infineon RF Power business or otherwise not fully realize anticipated benefits of the transaction; the risk that retail customers may alter promotional pricing, increase promotion of a competitor's products over our products or reduce their inventory levels, all of which could negatively affect product demand; the risk that our investments may experience periods of significant stock price volatility causing us to recognize fair value losses on our investment; the risk posed by managing an increasingly complex supply chain that has the ability to supply a sufficient quantity of raw materials, subsystems and finished products with the required specifications and quality; the risk we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings if our goodwill or amortizable assets become impaired; risks relating to confidential information theft or misuse, including through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusion; our ability to complete development and commercialization of products under development, such as our pipeline of Wolfspeed products, improved LED chips, LED components, and LED lighting products risks related to our multi-year warranty periods for LED lighting products; risks associated with acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures or investments generally; the rapid development of new technology and competing products that may impair demand or render our products obsolete; the potential lack of customer acceptance for our products; risks associated with ongoing litigation; and other factors discussed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including our report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended June 25, 2017, and subsequent reports filed with the SEC.

The simplest reason is to dodge an undesirable asset like a piece of real estate that could cost you more than you'd net by selling it (say, because of high property taxes or required repairs), or an asset that comes with strings attached (such as care of the deceased's pet or a requirement to marry).

Second, since capital requirements are now much more stringent both in their definition of what constitutes capital and in their coverage of risky assets, banks face higher costs for expanding their balance sheet.

Mortgage Lender Escrow Requirement Exemption — Vote Passed (294 - 129, 8 Not Voting) The House passed the bill that would exempt lenders with assets of $ 10 billion or less from the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul requirement that such lenders establish escrow accounts for the first five years of so - called «high - priced» mortgage loans, if the lenders hold the loan on its own balance sheet for three years after the loRequirement Exemption — Vote Passed (294 - 129, 8 Not Voting) The House passed the bill that would exempt lenders with assets of $ 10 billion or less from the 2010 financial regulatory overhaul requirement that such lenders establish escrow accounts for the first five years of so - called «high - priced» mortgage loans, if the lenders hold the loan on its own balance sheet for three years after the lorequirement that such lenders establish escrow accounts for the first five years of so - called «high - priced» mortgage loans, if the lenders hold the loan on its own balance sheet for three years after the loan is made.

The retail arm should have capital equal to 20 % of assets - a much higher requirement than in other nations.

Plus, 80 - plus percent of my client roster just wants ebooks, so it doesn't make a lot of sense to upset something that works simply because the asset - quality requirements for print are far higher than they are for ebooks.

Volatile assets such as cryptocurrency normally have higher margin requirements.

Although FHA's lending guidelines were compromised by some FHA lenders in their haste to process high volumes of mortgage loans before the housing bust, FHA lending requirements require full documentation of income, employment, and other assets used for buying or refinancing a home, unlike with Alt - A loans of years past.

All applicants must have a credit score of 740 or higher, combined debt to income ratio of 38 % or lower, meet program assets requirements and have a Loan to Value Ratio less than or equal to 60 %.

In practical terms, if you and your girlfriend split and the relationship meets the common - law requirements (living together for one year in some provinces and as high as three years in other provinces) than you or your girlfriend can make a claim that the condo is the matrimonial home and should be added to the assets that must be divided in the divorce.

The only one I am aware for Canadians in CommunityLend (and only in 3 provinces right now), but their eligibility requirements for becoming a lender there are pretty high (you need to be certified as an accredited investor which means you need $ 1M in assets and an income of at least $ 100k / year).

High deposit requirements don't always offer the best return however since brokerages are clearly looking to pull in assets, don't be afraid to ask brokerages to match a more competitive offer.

If I can find an abundance of stocks that meet my margin of safety requirements then I might raise my equity asset allocation to 65 % (or higher).

But recent changes to what is called prescribed asset requirements has freed this market from government prescription to a certain extent, with rates now generally higher than the inflation rate.

Margin requirements will tend to be higher for CFDs over shares than for other assets.

Thus, if you have assets that you want to protect, or if you think you are at a higher risk of causing an accident, you should consider getting insurance coverage that exceeds the minimum liability requirements.

Both larger and smaller firms were squarely faced with the reality that high billable - hour requirements (sometimes more than 2,400 hours annually) were taking a toll on their principal asset — attorneys.

In a recent judgment the High Court determined that the bank was in breach of the requirement not to withhold its consent unreasonably to the release of a secured asset from its security package for the purposes of sale.

Aside from the state minimum requirements, motorists should take the time to decide if they could benefit from higher liability limits to protect assets, and whether or not optional coverage would be needed such as comprehensive and collision to pay for a loss sustained by a policyholder's vehicle.

Coverage to Protect Your Assets Despite the required minimum requirements for bodily injury liability, it is probably in your best interest to purchase higher limits.

These are the minimum liability requirements, but many car owners elect to carry much higher limits to adequately protect their assets.

While this is state law requirement, getting a higher limit is a good investment especially if your car is still encumbered with a bank or your net worth of assets is humungous that you need to protect it from future lawsuits.

For example, buyers shouldn't have to deplete liquid assets to come up with the necessary down payment on a home; that's one reason the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS ® is fighting to prevent regulators from setting guidelines that would lead to high down - payment requirements (see «What We're Fighting For»).