So, if you think that through, then for that to be true, in a period in which atmospheric CO2 levels have risen in proportion to human emissions, something else would also have had to be emitting large amounts of CO2 while at the exact same time that we are completely unaware of, and much more strangely, something we don't know about would have to be removing large amounts of CO2, otherwise we would have
higher atmospheric levels of CO2 than we currently do.
But there is no scientifically valid evidence that CAGW will occur regardless of what is done or not done, and considerable evidence that
higher atmospheric levels of CO2 and slightly higher global temperatures would be beneficial, not harmful.
This is because warmer temperatures and other changes in the atmosphere related to a changing climate, including
higher atmospheric levels of methane, spur chemical reactions that lead to ozone.
The carbon they refer to is Carbon dioxide, / CO2 a gaseous product of the burning of practically any combustible product of this planet and a gas which if the planet lacked or was not present at a sufficiently
high atmospheric level and had remained so for countless millenniums past, no sentient life or plant life would exist today.
Not exact matches
As shown in previous studies, the litter from the polluted site, which had endured
high levels of
atmospheric nitrogen oxides and ozone, had
higher nitrogen content than litter from the clean site.
The relatively pleasant global climate of the past 10,000 years is largely thanks to
higher levels of
atmospheric carbon dioxide
Record emissions of carbon dioxide mean
atmospheric concentrations have reached
levels that lead to the
highest temperature increases
India, another huge source of
atmospheric pollution, recently allowed European scientists to measure its
high -
level aerosols, an experiment that also includes flights into Nepal and Bangladesh.
Also associated with this event are
high levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which are linked to elevated ocean and
atmospheric temperatures.
Overall, dippers had
higher mercury
levels than most other songbirds tested in western North America, which may be due to more
atmospheric deposition of mercury in snow at these
high elevations.
In the samples studied by the scientists, there are also
high levels of
atmospheric contamination from lead during the Roman Empire, when large quantities of this metal were extracted in the south of the Iberian Peninsula, as well as during the past 300 years, coinciding with the Industrial Revolution and the reactivation of mining activity in southern Spain.
The seven - day rainfall total from Harvey was as much as 40 percent
higher than rainfall from a similar storm would have been decades ago, before human activity caused
atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels to spike, according to a study published yesterday in Geophysical Research Letters.
The ice core data also shows that CO2 and methane
levels have been remarkably stable in Antarctica — varying between 300 ppm and 180 ppm — over that entire period and that shifts in
levels of these gases took at least 800 years, compared to the roughly 100 years in which humans have increased
atmospheric CO2
levels to their present
high.
If it all thaws out, we may see the
highest levels of
atmospheric methane in 10,000 years.
«We found
high levels of PCBs in a region of the world where we wouldn't expect to find them,» says Rosalinda Gioia, an
atmospheric pollution researcher at Lancaster University, UK, and the lead author of the report of the
high levels in Environmental Science & Technology.
«Wheat's photosynthetic pathway evolved 100 million years ago when
atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels were up to 10 times
higher than they are today,» he said.
Although plants grown in
high levels of carbon dioxide — say, double the current
atmospheric concentrations — initially grow rapidly, the growth tapers off within weeks and the plants wind up with a low protein content.
Consequently, the
atmospheric CO2
levels were
higher in the presence of the soil fungi than without.
Once
atmospheric CO2
levels rise and plants begins to photosynthesise at a
higher rate, the fungi may not be able to provide nitrates quickly enough to meet the plants» demands.
Turning up the heat seems to increase the rate at which the plants produce methane, Keppler says, which could explain why
atmospheric levels of methane were
high hundreds of thousands of years ago when global temperatures were balmy.
This dynamic time for East Antarctic glaciers occurred when
atmospheric temperatures and
atmospheric CO2
levels were similar to or
higher than present day.
Dr Tina Van De Flierdt, co-author from the Department of Earth Science and Engineering at Imperial College London, says: «The Pliocene Epoch had temperatures that were two or three degrees
higher than today and similar
atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels to today.
«Modern
atmospheric carbon dioxide
levels are today equivalent to those about three million years ago, when sea
level was at least six meters
higher because the ice sheets were greatly reduced.
A well - known example are dinosaurs: Many theories about animal gigantism offer
high levels of
atmospheric oxygen as an explanation.
The tropical rainforest was able to persist under elevated temperatures and
high levels of
atmospheric carbon dioxide,.......
If coal mining emitted anywhere near that
level it would dwarf all other sources of methane and
atmospheric levels would be much
higher (easily 5 ppm, maybe
higher).
April will be the first time in human history where
levels of
atmospheric carbon dioxide were
higher than 400 parts per million for an entire month, one scientist who monitors the
levels said.
A 2015 USDA report (Brown et al. 2015) on how climate affects agriculture delineates the sensitivities of specialty crops to many climate components (e.g., temperatures,
atmospheric CO2
levels, water supply, cloud and light conditions,
high winds and other extreme conditions).
However, current
levels of
atmospheric CO2 are
higher than those in the last 3 million years (Zhang et al. 2013), and these
levels are likely to drive changes to climate (Solomon et al. 2009).
The evidence here is more circumstantial, but Danish researcher Lars - Georg Hersoug notes that
atmospheric levels of the gas have risen during the same period and that in the United States, obesity has increased most rapidly on the East Coast, where CO2 concentrations are
highest.
At altitudes of 5000 m and
higher, life is not easy here: the
atmospheric pressure is much lower than at sea
level, and oxygen is scarce.
His research in
atmospheric chemistry, climate change and energy has involved him in shaping science and environmental policy at the
highest levels nationally and internationally.
If greenhouse gases were responsible for global temperature increases in recent decades,
atmospheric physics require that
higher levels of our atmosphere would show greater warming than lower
levels.
«Although Irene never reached the
highest category
levels of intensity, it did cause enough havoc to at least merit consideration,» said
atmospheric scientist Eugene McCaul of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center.
Others include poisoning of water supplies,
high levels of
atmospheric ash, crop damage, and disruption to transport.
Production values aren't sky -
high, but there are
atmospheric moments, particularly when it goes dark and you're given a flashlight (I just wish it could be held it in both orientations), and
levels have been designed intelligently to play to the strengths of VR.
When snowfall is
high in Siberia, the resultant cold air enhances
atmospheric disturbances, which propagate into the upper
level of the atmosphere, or stratosphere, warming the polar vortex.
No matter how scurrilous the actions of the oil companies, will the plaintiffs be able to show that the actions have resulted in
higher atmospheric CO2
levels, rising seas, and significant increased infrastructure costs for the plaintiffs?
This is inconsistent with the idea that
higher levels of
atmospheric greenhouse gases will result in increased Atlantic hurricane activity.»
If coal mining emitted anywhere near that
level it would dwarf all other sources of methane and
atmospheric levels would be much
higher (easily 5 ppm, maybe
higher).
Very stormy background due to chaotic distribution of cold and hot regions (icebergs from disintegrated ice sheets, and
high levels of
atmospheric CO2), due to global deglaciation.
Cosmic ray ionisation plays a minor role at ground
level but it is the predominant ionising agent in
higher atmospheric layers, already above a few kilometres.
If greenhouse gases were responsible for global temperature increases in recent decades,
atmospheric physics require that
higher levels of our atmosphere would show greater warming than lower
levels.
The whole issue is that any
level above what is often called the «effective radiating
level» (say, at ~ 255 K on Earth) should start to cool as
atmospheric CO2 increases, since the layers above this height are being shielded more strongly from upwelling radiation... except not quite, because convection distributes heating
higher than this
level, the stratosphere marks the point where convection gives out and there is
high static stability.
As the
atmospheric opacity is increased (e.g., 2xCO2), the physical location of the TAU = 1
level will rise to a
higher altitude, but the outgoing flux will still come from the TAU = 1
level since radiation doesn't care about the geometric scale), and the TAU = 1
level will still correspond to the same temperature (since the solar input energy is unchanged).
Also these trends this century are against a background of
higher than estimated man made CO2 emmisions and also that the forcing factor of this affect must have already been at its
highest level during the 21st century and can only decline as total
atmospheric CO2 increases.
Growing trees that then release their carbon 100 years from now might reduce the size of the transient
atmospheric high level, without changing the long climate tail.
Put it this way if
atmospheric levels of CO2 were fixed at to - day's
level (380ppm) indefinitely when would we see global temperatures 0.5 deg C
higher than to - day.
Their argument is that tropical Cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) clouds procuce less
high -
level cirrus - cloud outflow when sea surface temperatures (SST's) are warmer and
atmospheric water vapor is
higher.
The physics underlying the lapse rate will insure dew point temperatures at some
level in the
atmospheric column, although the
level will increase with global warming (the resulting
high (er) clouds may give a positive feedback).