«
The higher the cumulative carbon emissions are, the warmer it gets.»
Not exact matches
It's a big job, but it's one that has to be done anyway, since if the whole world tries to pull itself into prosperity by burning
carbon at the rate the US does, then we run out of coal even at the
highest estimates by 2100, and you wind up with no fossil energy and the hellish climate you get from 5000 gigatonnes
cumulative emission.
Other marine - based drainage systems become unstable under
higher emission scenarios, until most of the marine ice is eventually lost to the self - reinforcing feedback after about 2500 GtC of
cumulative carbon release
«The proportionality of warming to
cumulative emissions depends in part on a cancellation of the saturation of
carbon sinks with increasing
cumulative emissions (leading to a larger airborne fraction of
cumulative emissions for
higher emissions) and the logarithmic dependence of radiative forcing on atmospheric CO2 concentration [leading to a smaller increase in radiative forcing per unit increase in atmospheric CO2 at
higher CO2 concentrations; Matthews et al. (2009)-RSB-.
«In our mor recent global model simulations the ocean heat - uptake is slower than previously estimated, the ocean uptake of
carbon is weaker, feedbacks from the land system as temperature rises are stronger,
cumulative emissions of greenhouse gases over the century are
higher, and offsetting cooling from aerosol
emissions is lower.
Primary energy demand until 2035, from «Facing China's Coal Future», figure 1, page 7, Increases in
carbon emissions by fuel type for regions with
highest absolute
emissions growth, 2008 - 2035 from IEO2011, figures 115, page 143, and «
Cumulative carbon dioxide
emissions by region», figure 116, also on page 143, same link as above.