Worst of all, a 4 C world may not be a stable climate state — climate feedbacks at 4 C may make
a higher equilibrium point inevitable.
Not exact matches
The
equilibrium point varies with the forcing, which is low when the sun is down and
high when it's up.
So, the
equilibrium one discussing is a balance of heat, if this balance of heat included potential energy of molecules at
higher point in the gravity [what Vaughan described].
The
high thermal inertia of the oceans means there is a slow climb in temperature to the new
equilibrium point.
Spencer and Braswell freely admit that using their simple model is just the first step in a complicated diagnosis, but also
point out that the results from simple models provide insight that should help guide the development of more complex models, and ultimately could help unravel some of the mystery as to why full climate models produce
high estimates of the earth's
equilibrium climate sensitivity, while estimates based in real - world observations are much lower.
He mentions at one
point that increased CO2 from natural sources results in a temporary (not quantified) absorption of heat in the lower troposphere before thermal
equilibrium is restored as the CO2 is released into space from
higher and cooler parts of the atmosphere.
Adding CO2 will shift the
equilibrium point for global temperature to a
higher value.
Third, the free market is already deciding, as you read this, how
high fees are... they are currently at a price
point (generally 5 % around this neck - of - the - woods) known as the
equilibrium point arrived at by supply and demand (Economics 101).