Sentences with phrase «higher expense ratios outperform»

The right way to settle this debate would be with facts — do mutual funds with higher expense ratios outperform ones with lower expense ratios?

Not exact matches

And while cutting investing costs can't guarantee a larger nest egg, Morningstar research shows that funds with the lowest expense ratios tend to outperform their higher - fee counterparts.

Almost everybody these days says that passively managed, low expense ratio funds outperform actively managed, high expense ratio funds.

Mutual funds charge annual fees regardless of the fund's performance, and the higher a fund's expense ratio, the more the mutual fund manager must outperform the market to offer investors a better return than low - cost, index - tracking funds which are not actively managed and have fewer operating expenses.

The expense ratio is a little higher but it outperforms its benchmark more than enough to make up for this.

If you got what you paid for, high - expense ratio funds would outperform low - expense ratio funds.

That said, other Morningstar research has found that low - cost funds typically outperform their high - cost counterparts and that fund expense ratios are a predictor of future fund returns.