The panel acknowledged that its recommendations would increase costs and called for
a higher federal reimbursement to school districts, capital investments and money to train cafeteria workers to make the changes.
Not exact matches
Omada Health has accomplished a rare feat in the crowded world of digital health hopefuls: it's backed up lofty claims with actual results, helping the company score
federal government
reimbursements for its
high - tech diabetes prevention program.
There is an obvious disparity between the funds made available by the
federal government to support free meals for low - income students and the revenue collected by school districts (from
federal «paid» meal
reimbursements and student payments) to support the very same meals when served to children at
higher income levels.
[24] Since the
federal reimbursement for a free meal is $ 2.68 (see Table 1), the revenue generated by each paid meal in these districts falls 61 cents short in elementary schools and 27 cents short in
high schools, on average.
[23] When combined with the 27 cent
federal reimbursement for most paid lunches, this means these districts are collecting, on average, $ 2.07 for each paid lunch in elementary schools and $ 2.41 in
high schools.
In these schools, the combined average revenue for paid meals is $ 2.05 for elementary schools and $ 2.42 for
high schools, and the
federal reimbursement for a free meal for the 2009 - 2010 school year is $ 2.68.
Whether or not Congress chooses to increase
reimbursements, the first step to providing resources for
higher quality school meals is to ensure that
federal reimbursements for free and reduced price meals are used for their intended purpose — providing nutritious breakfasts and lunches to low - income school children.
Stated another way, the average revenue for a paid lunch in these largest school districts is only about 77 percent of the
federal reimbursement provided for free lunches in elementary schools and 90 percent of the
federal reimbursement in
high schools.
It's in the school's best interest to make sure all children who qualify for free meals apply for them: The more children who are eligible for free meals, the
higher the
reimbursements the school receives from the
federal government.
For example, what if districts with lower property values received more
federal reimbursement dollars for school meals than districts with
higher property values, with the affluent districts making up the difference via a
higher lunch price for paying students?
New York City has sought all forms of funding for meal
reimbursement and is now eligible to receive the
highest reimbursement from the
federal government through the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP).
Participating districts reported
higher breakfast and lunch participation and were significantly more likely to report that the
federal reimbursement rate was sufficient to cover the cost of producing a reimbursable meal.
When she is describing all of the barriers she faces, keep in mind that she is not trying to be a naysayer; the challenges she faces, including the often ridiculous regulations, the criminally low
federal reimbursement for subsidized meals, the
high cost of food, labor, utilities, and every other expense, are all very real.
Accordingly, rather than force children to take the whole meal and throw out much of it, in 1975, Congress passed an amendment to the School Lunch Act allowing
high schools to still receive
federal reimbursement for meals so long as students selected at least three out of five options served, including milk.
That's very different situation from a
high school like Holy Trinity where kids have no other lunch options (besides lunch from home), keeping the level of
federal reimbursement dollars
higher.
The report makes some controversial proposals to a system known as the «Cadillac» of Medicaid programs (because it covers so much), including changing the way
reimbursement rates are set, a complete state takeover of the responsibilities now borne by the counties, reform of the medical malpractice system and a push for a
higher federal contribution.
The battle for increased
reimbursement will play out over the next 90 days as the budget is negotiated, and against the backdrop of a state - imposed Medicaid cap, uncertainty over the future of
federal Medicaid funding and cries from long - term care facilities and home health care providers, which are also pleading for
higher reimbursements.
The ability of schools to offer meals other than lunch has been limited by
high food costs, shrinking school budgets, and reduced
federal reimbursements and funding to maintain school kitchens.
Federal reimbursements are projected to increase from $ 194.7 million in FY2013 to $ 201.1 million in FY2014 with an increased
reimbursement rate,
higher contribution of donated food, and increased participation rate in the snacks and after - school program.
The domination of
federal child welfare services funding by worker training,
reimbursement of foster parents, case management for children in foster care, and adoption subsidies (all entitlements under Title IV - E of the Social Security Act) leaves few resources to develop or implement
high - quality parent education.