The prospect of
higher future taxes has particular significance for your retirement account, since choosing the right account can depend largely on whether you expect to pay higher or lower income taxes in the future.
Balanced budgets promote growth, because people do not fear
higher future taxes.
Optimizing the time to start benefits requires balancing tax - deferred growth in RRSPs with
higher future taxes payable.
This can be expected to produce a negative trickle - down effect, as higher government debt leads to higher interest rates, lower business investment, and
higher future tax rates — possibly on the middle class.
In other words, the clients will have actually destroyed long - term wealth by trying to dodge
higher future tax burdens, not realizing that those future tax burdens could come with lower marginal rates.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate,
future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of
future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in
tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
tax law, such as the effect of The
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other thin
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to
higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or
future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
These policies are known to have
high expenses but may offer steady returns,
tax - deferred growth and no exposure to income
taxes in the
future.
A Roth 401 (k) isn't always better financially — for example, if you work in a
high -
tax state now but plan to retire in a lower -
tax state in the
future — but for the majority of Americans, the Harvard study shows a Roth 401 (k) leads to increased spending power in retirement.
The AHCA sacrifices $ 900 billion in
future revenues by eliminating all other Obamacare
taxes, including special levies on
high - earners and annual fees on insurers.
The debt crisis will change the focus to the probable solution: A
future of far
higher taxes and a government on autopilot to absorb more and more of the private sector.
If you want to move your 401 (k) to a Roth IRA, you'll have to pay
taxes on the amount of the conversion, but if you anticipate your income being
higher in
future years then it could be good idea to convert it now so it can grow
tax - free.
«Much of the welfare state concept was always an illusion, one financed by lavish amounts of debt for which present and
future taxpayers will pay in the form of
higher taxes and reduced services during their lifetimes,» writes University of Calgary lecturer Mark Milke in a recent article.
Ford will leave office with Torontonians facing
higher taxes for the foreseeable
future.
Though we don't have a crystal ball, if you believe your
tax rate will be
higher in the
future due to your expected income stream or your beliefs about
future tax rates, then you should consider this new
tax change.
In its wake, we've seen residents in
high property
tax states rushing to pre-pay their 2018 bills, small businesses re-evaluating their organizational structures, and corporations positioning themselves for potentially massive repatriations as well as a
future earnings windfall.
And now that our careers are going, we're looking at maxing out two traditional 401Ks and two Roth IRAs this year, and we see the Roth IRA portion as a small hedge against rising
future tax rates (or what I think is a bit more likely to happen —
tax brackets that don't keep pace with inflation, so keep sucking in more and more people to
higher brackets).
Returns are calculated after
taxes on distributions, including capital gains and dividends, assuming the
highest federal
tax rate for each type of distribution in effect at the time of the distribution Past performance is no guarantee of
future results.
«It's important think through whether or not they're going to be in a
higher tax bracket in
future years, because if they are, then it may not make sense to take the whole benefit in the first year.»
Companies that have used these methods record DTLs on their balance sheets to account for the
higher taxes they expect to pay in the
future.
I also believe that the likelihood of even lower
taxes in the
future is very low — so a Roth may be the be the best opportunity to take advantage of the current low
tax environment if you adhere to the old adage of choosing a Roth if you believe
future taxes will be
higher.
A 529 plan is a
tax - advantaged investment vehicle designed to encourage saving for the
future higher education expenses of the plan's beneficiary.
Over time, that adds up to trillions of dollars in increased
future government spending — and
higher taxes.
Charitable deductions may be worth more if
taxes go up in the
future, because they may be deducted against a
higher tax rate.
You may benefit from a Roth conversion if you expect to be in a
higher tax bracket in retirement, already own taxable and
tax - deferred savings accounts, or want to leave a financial legacy to
future generations.
In addition, our
future income
taxes could fluctuate because of earnings being lower than anticipated in jurisdictions that have lower statutory
tax rates and
higher than anticipated in jurisdictions that have
higher statutory
tax rates, by changes in the valuation of our deferred
tax assets and liabilities, or by changes in
tax laws, regulations, or accounting principles.
A Roth is a reasonable bet that
taxes might be
higher in the
future, but in most cases it's superseded by the fact that spreading your taxable income over your retirement years will result in a lower
tax bracket.
All of this doesn't even begin to account for the potential for
higher taxes to service and repay the substantial run up in federal debt that has taken place already and that is planned for the
future.
More important, however, is the potential impact on
future profits, which would likely be lower if the company has to pay
higher taxes on an ongoing basis.
According to the statute's own language, it was designed with the «purpose of reducing the need for
future tax increases, maintaining the
highest possible bond rating, reducing the need for short term borrowing, providing available resources to meet State obligations whenever casual deficits or failures in revenue occur, and providing the means of addressing budgetary shortfalls.»
The nation's aging population,
higher projected demand for
tax efficient savings products and rising interest rates remain key to Athene's
future growth, Athene officials said.
If you really need a
tax break now because your income and
tax brackets are
high, and you think that they will be lower in the
future, then the 401k may be the one to max out first.
Although, I expect that
tax rates will be
higher in the
future, since they at historically low levels now.
You must keep in mind though that the current laws are scheduled to change in the near
future and depending upon what direction Congress takes with the estate
tax, you could find your estate exposed to
higher taxes.
I'm a huge saver (80 - 90 %) of every paycheck as an engineer but with this I can invest it as I see fit without regulations and not have any
higher taxes to deal with later on (where I agree with you,
taxes will be much
higher in the
future than it is now to address our spending problem... and more importantly our growing debt problem).
You may want to save those losses for use against
future capital gains that may be
taxed at a
higher rate.
Reforms such as
higher taxes, lower benefits and delayed retirement are designed to put Social Security on a firm financial footing, so that the sheer passage of time does not force
future payees and retirees into a crisis that would severely hurt both groups.
Amid confusion and chaos in the outward scene, disharmony among the nations,
high prices and
high wages and
high taxes, uncertainty as to the political or economic
future, what would modern man like most to have?
Given that Scottish Labour, the Scottish Liberal Democrats and Scottish Greens all support increasing
tax in some form, the logic of that statement would be
higher tax, but then the intent was more political: by tying the other parties (not, one suspects, the Scottish Tories) into the process, Sturgeon is heading off
future battles.
The final agreement not only burnishes Cuomo's liberal credentials by extending (though not expanding) the millionaire's
tax, raising the age of criminal responsibility of New York and addressing the
high cost of college tuition for members of the middle class, it also dramatically increases his (already considerable) budget powers, enabling him to single - handedly make spending cuts in the event of widely expected
future federal funding reductions.
Then, the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a Corker - backed proposal to automatically raise
taxes in the
future if Republican expectations of
higher growth did not materialize was not consistent with Senate rules.
As illustrated in the Executive Budget financial plan, the state will be facing significant budget gaps in each of the next three years, and a new payroll
tax on employers will be a tempting target for
future administrations and Legislatures looking for increased revenues, but reluctant to impose new or
higher taxes directly on individuals.
Key policy - makers and
high profile journalists will be joining the CIOT and the Institute for Fiscal Studies at the main party conferences this autumn for a series of debates on the
future of the
tax system.
New York has no
future as the
high tax capital of the world and keeping the
tax cap in place, as well as enacting the Governor's property
tax credit, will provide
tax relief to those who need it the most.»
«People are so focused on the state's
future and concerned about the state's economic growth under governor Malloy and one of the worst job recovery records and
higher taxes,» he said after a campaign stop in Shelton.
«As the governor has repeatedly said: New York has no
future as the
high tax capital of the world.»
Rumours of a graduate
tax were substantiated today, when Vince Cable delivered a speech on the
future of
higher education.
The New York Post Editorial Page has reminded all New Yorkers daily what Governor Cuomo said on October 17, 2011: «You are kidding yourself if you think you can be one of the
highest -
taxed states in the nation, have a reputation for being anti-business — and have a rosy economic
future.»
In response to James» question about the Labour leadership candidates — Ed Miliband campaigned for Simon Hughes to speak out & is encouraging his supporters to call on the Lib Dems to stand up for their values, David Miliband has suggested ending the charitable status of fee - paying schools and (one of those non-monetary aspects to reducing inequality) giving representation to ordinary workers on corporate remunertion committees, Ed Balls has strongly opposed the VAT rise and is calling for a graduate
tax instead of
higher tuition fees, Andy Burnham has reiterated his support for a National Care Service and spoken out on the abolition of the
Future Jobs Fund, Diane Abbot has called for fair taxation, cancelling Trident, and setting a timetable for troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.
«As the governor has said, New York has no
future as the
high -
tax capital of the world.»
Paterson and state Senate leaders have opposed
higher taxes on the wealthy in
future budgets.