Sentences with phrase «higher means then»

And it means if you are not born rich or have not striven to higher means then you may be part of an under - served community and can all yourself an average Canadian.

Not exact matches

And let's not forget how unrestricted messaging, which was common back then, meant high - profile executives are likely to get bombarded with spam.

That means traders who bought the options per Quigg's recommendation were already set to make a profit: If they exercise their option to sell the shares at the higher strike price and then buy at a lower price, they profit with the difference.

If a high - quality lead for your business means you need a name, email address, phone number and a few other specific pieces of information, then don't be afraid to require it.

That means, if your click - through rate is low versus your competition, then you're going to struggle to get a high Quality Score.

If you're spending beyond your means, or have a lot of high - interest debt, then there is a chance of less likely to qualify for the lowest rates on a mortgage.

LONG — When we go long it means we are buying the market and so we want the market to rise so that we can then sell back our position at a higher price than we bought for.

If economic growth is leading to an increase in the demand for oil and bidding up its price, then the higher price means things are going well.

The Chase Sapphire Preferred card is meant for high spenders, and comes with an introductory annual fee of $ 0 the first year, then $ 95 every year after that.

But if this article was meant to convey an opinion (i.e. «We shouldn't export oil because higher pump prices are an unstoppable evil») then you might as well argue that we shouldn't export ANY goods because that causes the price of those good to go up at home.

Back then, a blue chip stock simply meant a high - priced stock, a reference to how many poker establishments used the color blue for their most valuable chip.

Since rising interest rates means the bond's fixed rate is not competitive against newly issued bonds at higher market rates, then it stands to reason that longer - term bonds (those with longer to pay at the lower rate) are going to see their prices fall further than short - term bonds.

Do Nothing investing means buying high - quality businesses and then holding them for the long - run.

First, profit margins in the U.S. seem to have stopped mean reverting in the old, normal way, and second, some real estate markets have bubbled up and then stayed there at high prices.

If you're intrigued, the banks below are proven players in the game, which means they're unlikely to pull a bait - and - switch on you by offering a high interest rate to start and then significantly lowering it later.

That means an estimation of all the tutoring, baby - sitting and piano lessons I was giving in high school, which as a rough guess were about $ 6,000 a year for four years, then the $ 1,000 - something I was making flipping burgers, working a cash register or waitressing during the first three years of college, and the $ 2,000 - odd I got during the last two years of business school.

If you followed the argument then this means for the same amount «invested» / gambled the binary option has an implicit leverage that can be higher than the explicit leverage on the forex product.

They first look at return correlations and then consider mean - variance portfolio optimization with global equities, U.S. Treasury bonds, U.S. high - yield corporate bonds, emerging government bonds and frontier government bonds.

That means it's important to not shrug off talk of higher rates as just a pipe dream, and then get caught holding the bag if and when they transpire.

So if you have one kind of growth — booming financial fortunes in the stock market, higher real - estate prices and more expensive means of living — then you are going to have slower growth in the real economy because money is diverted from peoples» pay - checks away from buying goods and services to just having to pay the banks.

And he could be serious about his faith, as well: In reply to Garry Wills» claim that «being Catholic always mattered more to him than being conservative,» Buckley responded, «If he meant he has a higher loyalty to God than to civil society, then the answer is obvious: God has to be preeminent.»

Gary: I think I agree with your point that «if 1 man and 1 woman was a normal teaching of Paul's» for all believers, then it follows that the text either means «this is only for the elders and higher positions» OR that the text was referring to some other situation, such as marrying a divorced woman.

Both are weighty issues that deal explicitly with «high cosmic justice,» so if he argues that a government overreaches its authority to execute justice by attempting to «balance the books of the universe» in repaying blood with blood, then does that mean there can never be any just criteria for one nation to retaliate against another after an unprovoked attack» an attack that in essence would repay blood with blood?

I mean if he / she doesn't believe a higher power blessed them with the position of presidency, and believe they did it all on their own then that has to produce some great pride.

Here then is a theology that either means nothing certainly identifiable (without supernatural grace or high genius in the art of reconnecting with experience concepts carefully divested of relation to it) or else means that the world might exactly as well not have existed, or as well have existed with far more evil or less good in it than it actually presents.

If the price of virginity is the repression and distortion of that which is good and wondrous; if virginity is achieved by surrounding sex with guilt and fear; if the quest for virginity drives them to an unhealthy dependency on some form of autoeroticism as a preferred means to release their sexual energy; then for those reasons I would say the price of virginity is too high on my scale of values.

You mean, we were without morals, like other animals, in the beginning and then we achieved higher intelligence (not part of God's plan for us BTW).

But if we are failing to be salt and light in the world, then we are supposed to be held to higher standards, and sometimes this means people will point out to us our failures.

My main point is, when you test to see if prayer works, there are ways to randomize it so bias is out of the equation (Usually double - blind tests work nicely) and then before you even begin you outline that a prayer that works means the person is healed instantly, or to make it slightly more «fair» and conform to laws of nature more, a person who has prayers heals at an abnormally high rate.

In that spirit, then, Dionysius could affirm that love, as applied to the Godhead, «means a faculty of unifying and conjoining and of producing a special commingling together in the Beautiful and Good... and holds together things of the same order by a mutual connection, and moves the highest to take thought for those below and fixes the inferior in a state which seeks the higher.»

just because some dude went off to some island on vacation and got high as a kite and ate some bad food, then decided to be a «creative writer», doesn't mean it has extra value.

And his teaching about judging in the sermon of the mount is spelling out, what Jeremy explains here in an existential form (and so does his words about giving the other cheek, walking the second mile and so on — he explains here what should mean to hold high the law of god, and what is this other, then do the opposite what the Israelite did, when they conquered Canaan?

If the world is a world in dynamic movement, then God as its chief principle of explanation will himself be in dynamic movement; if ceaseless adaptation to novel possibilities is found in the order of creation, the meaning of creation will itself include a factor which in the highest degree is adaptable.

(49) Even in terminal illnesses there is a possibility of actualizing attitudinal values: «Whenever one is confronted with an inescapable, unavoidable situation, whenever one has to face a fate which can not be changed, e.g. in incurable cancer; just then one is given a last chance to actualize the highest value, to fulfill the deepest meaning, the meaning of suffering.

Not sure what happened but that means I am off by quite a lot for day one and this worries me for other days with even higher carb allotments if I am going to be way off then as well.

Peter Mares: I've got to say though that if I know I've had such and such a percentage of my daily intake with my breakfast cereal and then I have to try and remember what that was at lunchtime or in the afternoon, I mean, I certainly don't find it simple as I would find a red light warning me, «Well, this is high in fat,» or a green light telling me it's low in sugar.

haha yeah i was a bit mad then lol i mean for example you also state the wages of our players and criticize it but that does nt annoy me cause i think you generally do nt like the high wages and money in the football nowadays and i agree with that, but the people who DO want signings and keep singling walcott out while we have SOOOO many underperforming players with the main matter being his wage is really contradictory, of course i know too that he is playing bad, but they should get it that nowadays wages for the english player are overexaggerated..

If I wanted to be a disingenuous putz, I could pretend that comparison meant something (as if the bodies of a high schooler and a grown - ass professional athlete wouldn't be markedly different), and I could point out that Jones sure had a noticeable dip in production when he turned 32 and then suddenly got much better (as if that kind of variance doesn't happen in baseball all the freaking time).

He's been going all - out for club and country since then — meaning Ronaldo has had 14 - plus years of heavy minutes, high intensity, and monumental pressure to deal with.

If and when it does happen it just means that the same rules will aply as with non EU players, I presume, with work permits required based on international appearances etc, etc. but then again it is likely that special dispensations will be given to footballers as in other high profile high earning entertainment industries.

Fun for her then meant dancing for hours a night, high on meth and cloaked in black clothes and white makeup, like a vampire.

there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy of their respective clubs... of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead of others, especially if clubs of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting of parameters for a changing of the guard... in the case of Arsenal, this sort of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional people» to maintain a certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state of Denmark

In 1969, the Supreme Court struck down the act, but then the Controlled Substances Act took its place and categorized cannabis as Schedule I — meaning, in the government's view, that cannabis has a high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medicinal value.

WHISKEY BUSINESS trumpeted the next day's Post after Wells gave new meaning to the term «high - ball pitcher» by minimizing his bout with gout: «If [the cause] is beer, then I'll go to whiskey; if it's whiskey, then I'll go to vodka.

With all respect Sir, Theo Walcott despite a long serving player is not Asenal material he does nt even know how to play simple one two he always tried to force his way past opponent and being one of the highest player in arsenal payroll — if the main reason for him being around for over 10 years because some regulation mandate then yes — i mean home grown and all those quota things.

of big men running fast in short area drills shows high success on the football field, then yeah it probably means something.

I'd still prefer Guice / Rojo (even though that means spending a high pick on RB), but the idea of Justin Reid and then Kelly is pretty tasty.

However the tendency at Arsenal seems to be that he will either (a) Become really good, then go off to another team in search of major trophies, or (b) In 7 years we'll still be waiting for him to become consistently good while paying him very high wages in the mean time.

Personally I would say the guy just ain't worth it.That money can be used more wisely to get what we need.Lemar shouldn't have been a priority.The centre of the park should have been the problem.We are missing the point clearly.Even Bernardo Silva is as good as him yet went for lower.I've watched him and I know eventually he'll be world class but that doesn't mean he should be worth that bid because we have players his age wiyh more potential and cheaper.I remember people stating how Lacazette was not even worth # 45 some seasons back then all of a sudden he's signed for higher and people are behaving like they already like him.I'm sure the logic was that he was in the French league and possibly can't cut it at the top.This isn't money well spent at all.

If you play high against Arsenal and press as if you were pressing Giroud, then one pass from Cazorla means Walcott is gone.