Sentences with phrase «higher returns over»

A great benefit of paying over a limited time is that you invest a greater amount in the cash value portion of the policy early on, meaning you earn higher returns over the length of coverage.

For goals that will arise in the distant future (beyond 7 years), equity - oriented ULIPs would be more suitable since these ULIPs have the potential to provide you higher returns over a longer period of time.

But newer, more competitive products, such as an equity indexed universal life policy, may be able to produce much higher returns over time.

As we know life insurance is a type of investment, even low premiums have the ability to generate comparatively higher returns over a certain period of time.

This shortlisting further endorses our strong investment performance as reported by ARC's Private Client Indices (PCIs) from Q2 2017, where we have achieved higher returns over five years than practically all of our competitors relative to the risk taken.

Longer - term bonds are riskier than shorter - term instruments and have yielded higher returns over the 86 years ending in 2013.

This riskier portfolio will likely be compounding with higher returns over time.

Although TD does indeed have lower MER's with its E-Series funds, upon closer examination, RBC's index funds for Canadian Equity and Bond have consistently higher returns over YTD, 1 yr, 3 yr, 5 yr, and earlier.

Although growth and value both belong in a portfolio, ultimately, the empirical evidence demonstrates that a tilt towards value, as well as perhaps a tilt towards small companies, has produced higher returns over time.

A higher growth option will have higher risk and experience more volatile returns over the short term, but will usually achieve higher returns over the long term.

It's more volatile than other Couch Potatoes, but may produce higher returns over time:

Am I wrong to think that international funds (especially emerging markets) are riskier than US stocks and should therefore have higher returns over the long term?

Although TD does indeed have lower MER's with its E-Series funds, upon closer examination, RBC's index funds for Canadian Equity and Canadian Bond have both consistently demonstrated higher returns over YTD, 1 yr, 3 yr, 5 yr, and earlier.

If we were going to do that, we might as well go 100 % stocks, since they've had much higher returns over that time period.

This sort of investment has a higher risk than a savings account but will usually provide higher returns over the medium to long - term.

A growth fund is more likely to produce higher returns over the long term but is usually more volatile in the short term.

Nothing is ever free, but it is my belief that limiting the costs associated with your investing activities will help to generate considerably higher returns over the long - term.

A great benefit of paying over a limited time is that you invest a greater amount in the cash value portion of the policy early on, meaning you earn higher returns over the length of coverage.

The new Target Date recommendation takes more risk by investing in the more volatile small - cap - value and emerging markets asset classes early on, but history suggests that leads to significantly higher returns over a 20 to 40 year time frame which is what a young investor has ahead of them.

Because stocks typically have higher returns over time, as your portfolio grows, you will end up with a greater proportion of stocks to bonds.

Equity, being the higher risk form of financing, will tend to reward its owners with higher returns over long periods of time.

Higher - yielding stocks tend to offer higher returns over time than low - or no - yield stocks, according to research from Jeremy Siegel and others.

Those who have a larger allocation to stocks can reasonably expect somewhat higher returns over the long haul.

BlackRock's Global Chief Investment Strategist Richard Turnill explains why investors aiming for higher returns over the next five years should be prepared to stomach this.

The big takeaway from this week's chart of the week: Investors aiming for higher returns over the next five years should be prepared to stomach more volatility.

Academic research by Eugene Fama and Kenneth French has provided convincing evidence that exposure to risk factors based on company size (smaller = riskier) and value / growth (value = riskier) has resulted in higher returns over many periods in multiple countries.

For the chance to get higher returns over the long term, investors have historically had to put up with bigger fluctuations in value over the short term.

When you're young, you can afford to take more risks, which result in higher returns over the long term (and we're talking decades).

Companies often issue debt as a way to borrow funds cheaply to earn higher returns over the long term.

Relative to «moderate allocation» hybrid funds, the advisor's goals are less volatility, better down market performance, fewer negative 12 ‐ month losses, and higher returns over a market cycle.

Employees, typically unaware of cashout options, choose the glossy brochure pushing for higher returns over the less understood income stream.

Compared to value stocks, growth stocks can potentially generate higher returns over time and you can start investing in them without spending a ton of money.

The most popular and active stocks on average may have higher returns over a few months as investors feel better and better about the stock.

Leveraged exposure magnifies the indexs performance, potentially providing higher returns over time.

While stocks are riskier than bonds or cash investments, they have much higher returns over the long run and many issue dividends on top of this.

This riskier portfolio will likely be compounding with higher returns over time.

A: Yes, most stocks have shown unsustainably high returns over the past six years.

For one, it illuminates the importance of foregoing some earnings, especially in your 20s while attending graduate school, especially for students in majors that wouldn't typically earn high returns over their lifetime.

This process clearly involves more by the farmer (investment, time, etc) on the front end, but may provide a higher return over the long term.

As we discussed earlier too, we believe such approach of selecting funds is not ideal as investors generally tend to get carried away with high returns over a short term.

Posted fixed mortgage rates have always been above government bond yields so paying off your house will offer a higher return over the long - term.

Then they're still picking the one with the highest return over the last 5, 10 years.

The theory is that different assets / sectors / countries» returns are less correlated — and the average of a wide range of assets / sectors / countries will more reliably produce high returns over the long run.

Jensen's approach to investing focuses on those companies with a record of achieving high returns over the long term and which the firm believes are undervalued relative to their business performance.

With little else to go on, confused investors may simply choose the ETF that had the highest returns over the last year or so, which is a recipe for disappointment.

It's not the one that would have delivered the highest return over the last 12 months, because that is always unknowable in advance and has no bearing on the future.

Any investment that guarantees returns, or that has unrealistically high returns over a long period of time is likely to be a Ponzi scheme.

This fund has given high returns over the years and has consistently outperformed its benchmark.

In addition, while mid-caps had more risk than large - caps, investors have been rewarded with a higher return over the same period.

Among all the asset classes, equities historically provide investors with the highest returns over the long - term, but stocks also incur the highest risk (look at the stock markets now).