Sentences with phrase «higher royalties because»

Co-publishing deals typically pay higher royalties because the author is investing in the development of the book by paying creative development and other pre-publication fees.

You can also get your book oYou'll have higher royalties because you'll be self - publishing through (hopefully) Amazon.

«No one is ever getting a higher royalty because of this,» I would say.

If a writer can negotiate a higher royalty because he has competing offers then good luck to him!

Not exact matches

LNG development also has strong political support in B.C. — all three major parties favour it in principle — because, unlike oil from Alberta, it would almost certainly result in higher royalty revenues.

Bottled water represents less than 20 per cent of CCA's Australian earnings, but generates higher margins than carbonated soft drinks because of lower input and production costs and the fact that it owns the Mt Franklin brand outright and does not pay royalties to The Coca - Cola Co..

But perhaps the best reason is because authors publishing under «higher» packages earn higher royalties and their book copy prices are less expensive.

The author's royalty is not a particularly high percentage of the sale because the publisher is putting up all the money and taking most of the risks so they rightfully expect to make the lion's share of the profits.

Most indies were sticking to $ 2.99 and up because Amazon made $ 2.99 - $.9.99 the point at which authors could earn the highest royalty percentage.

Because Amazon and BN.com provide higher royalties for books priced between $ 2.99 and $ 9.99, this is good price range to stay in.

Royalties: Small publishers often pay a higher royalty rate than the big publishers, because they have lower costs.

After being approached by Shelf Media about an unconventional deal to publish Final Appearance through Lulu.com, Stark decided against a traditional publishing contract and royalty advance because of the greater control and potentially higher revenue share self - publishing — or «direct publishing» as Stark calls it — might bring to an accomplished novelist such as himself.

Because the print industry will demand ebook rights, then price them too high and give you a shitty royalty rate.

Should we really let our royalties be taken away so easily, because they're still higher than what traditional publishing would offer?

Personally, I think the higher royalties is better because they will make more in the long run if the book sells well, but sometimes, authors» financial needs make it important to have a big advance up front.

As you can see in the chart above, for prices below $ 2.99, for a book the length of mine in this genre, they expect me to gross more at $ 1.99 than at $ 0.99 — but much more (because of the higher royalty rate) at $ 2.99.

Scribd then decided to axe digital comics, because the royalties were too high.

While still compatible with all file formats, including Kindle's MOBI file, the royalty rate is so high because the titles are sold through the company's own website instead of through powerhouse book retailers.

For example, the ebook royalty rate isn't negotiable for now because every single author with a decent agent has a clause that says as soon as another author at the same house receives a higher rate, they'll get the higher rate, too.

I like the idea of self publishing because the royalties are higher if you hit big.

One company claims its high pricing is author - friendly because it increases potential royalties.

And most of the wisdom seems to be that it's best to run ads on a box set when you've got three books because the royalty is higher, so you're more likely to get positive ROI.

Because of small presses paying higher royalties, there are some big authors who are switching to self publishing because simple; they already have a huge fanbase who would buy anything theyBecause of small presses paying higher royalties, there are some big authors who are switching to self publishing because simple; they already have a huge fanbase who would buy anything theybecause simple; they already have a huge fanbase who would buy anything they write.

«Unpaid royalties of approximately $ 7,300 because the publisher sold nearly 6,500 copies of a $ 17.99 hardcover edition at «high discount,» even though Agent Kristin had ensured that the author's contract limited the number of copies the publisher was allowed to sell at high discount.»

So no, Scalzi would not be making a higher «royalty» self - pubbing with Amazon because Amazon doesn't pay royalties unless you publish with their actual publishing imprints.

For many, independent publishing is a stepping stone towards getting a traditional publishing deal; others prefer self - publishing because they receive a higher royalty on sales and retain full control of their rights.

If I can sell 10,000 books at $ 3.99 a download, which I've been consistently able to do through Amazon, that strikes me as a better deal than being able to sell 3,000 books at $ 12 a paperback, particularly because my royalty rates are way higher on downloads and I can jam out two or more of those downloadable books a year.

Data shows that authors who sell their ebooks at a $ 2.99 price point can actually end up earning more in royalties than authors whose books are priced at $ 6.99 or higher because they move more product.

This is a key reason why they are giving you a higher royalty — because you are doing the marketing instead of Amazon.com.

It's because most of us have decided we'd be better off spending those dollars and recovering them from our higher self - publishing or small press royalties than lining the pockets of a publisher and agent.

I chose $ 2.99 because it was the lowest point at which the higher royalties are paid.

It's almost certain that ebooks, because they're often self published, and even when traditionally published have higher royalty rates than print, make up a substantially higher fraction of author earnings than they do of consumer spending.

They would do this by receiving their royalty on a higher average price that readers might pay for a more useful ebook — because royalties ultimately are based on what a book will sell for — and from the extra sales made to readers who want this specific feature.

So there's that and then for the paid sales it's all about... It works best with boxed sets because there's an expense for advertising that needs to be defrayed by a higher royalty item so I tend to sell $ 6.99 box sets that give me $ 5.20 from Amazon and I can get clicks around about 20 or 30 cents per click and I can convert those clicks at around about 10 %.

And while readers are going to be able to get more and more books for less money, authors are going to make a lot more money because of the higher royalty rates.

So I'm basically losing money hand over fist because Hyperion is pricing my ebooks too high, and giving me too low a royalty rate.

And because TPs still won't publish much outside the norm, save vampire stories, authors are going digital and making a lot more money (remember, higher royalties on reasonably priced books) than if they'd gone traditional.

Yes, you will earn higher royalty amount when a book is sold directly from Prowess store because the distribution cost will only be 30 % of the MRP and not 50 % unlike other eCommerce stores.

However, just because the royalties for KDP are higher, it won't help if you price your book at $ 9.99 and no one buys it.

You could more than make up for a higher royalty per book (using a price point of $ 2.99 or above) because of the higher quantity of books sold at the lower 99 Cent price.

One minute he is misguidedly complaining about the high non-cash depletion charges associated with his iron ore royalty (remember that from a few quarters ago???), the next he is rescinding a promise to return capital back to shareholders (the intended amount started high, went higher, then went to nothing, presumably because of the Pea Ridge investment).

Canadian natural gas producers are among the highest cost in the business (Compton is higher than normal because they sold royalties on their land).

First, it leads to getting more users, and higher impact (and royalties) because people value the ability to customize.