Not exact matches
In this context, switching from
high -
cost diesel to a low -
carbon alternative fuel isn't just the green thing to do; it's key to ensuring consumer products stay at affordable prices, Elizabeth Fretheim, director
of business strategy and sustainability logistics at Wal - Mart Stores Inc., explained at a symposium last week hosted by the nonprofit group Business for
Social Responsibility (BSR).
The authors acknowledge that, if we place nearly as
high a value on the wellbeing
of future generations as we do on present generations, the
social cost of carbon emissions is very large.
The private benefit
of carbon is much
higher than the
social cost of carbon.
However, the
social cost of carbon (SCC) is
higher (by about 15 %) under uncertainty than in the certainty - equivalent case because
of asymmetry in the impacts
of uncertainty on the damages from climate change.
Many experts believe that the federal government's
social cost of carbon estimates are too low, in part because «problems like droughts,
higher food prices, lost fisheries, and some extreme weather are left out
of the government's calculation.»
In addition to the avoided
social cost of carbon — at $ 23 per MWh,
higher than the ZEC subsidy cap — the CES offers significant economic benefits.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that the
social cost of carbon is around $ 39 per ton, and you can argue the number
higher or lower.
Further, as Reason Foundation Vice President Julian Morris «finds the administration's estimates
of the
social cost of carbon are «biased upwards» due to their reliance on three «simplistic models, all
of which use estimates
of climate sensitivity that are likely too
high and two
of which likely overestimate the economic impact
of climate change.»