It is also associated with
a higher use of epidural.
Not exact matches
Homebirth increases the risk
of perinatal death and brain damage even though the incidence
of epidural use was 5 times
higher in the hospital group.
Nurse - midwives demonstrated with a
high grade level
of evidence a lower rate
of cesarean sections, lower apgar scores, lower labor augmentation, lower episotomy rates, equivalent low birthrates, lower vaginal operative deliveries, less
use of labor analgesia and
epidurals, and lower rates
of third - and fourth - degree perineal lacerations.
Flint and colleagues suggested that when midwives get to know the women for whom they provide care, interventions are minimised.22 The Albany midwifery practice, with an unselected population, has a rate for normal vaginal births
of 77 %, with 35 %
of women having a home birth.23 A review
of care for women at low risk
of complications has shown that continuity
of midwifery care is generally associated with lower intervention rates than standard maternity care.24 Variation in normal birth rates between services (62 % -80 %), however, seems to be greater than outcome differences between «
high continuity» and «traditional care» groups at the same unit.25 26 27
Use of epidural analgesia, for example, varies widely between Queen Charlotte's Hospital, London, and the North Staffordshire NHS Trust.
A recent review also found
higher rates
of jaundice for
epidural - exposed babies, which may be related to the increase in instrumental deliveries or to the increased
use of Pitocin.85
Epidurals and spinals offer laboring women the most effective form
of pain relief available, and women who have
used these analgesics rate their satisfaction with pain relief as very
high.
There are also reports
of newborn drug toxicity from
epidural drugs, especially opiates administered via
epidural.80 Newborn opiate toxicity seems more likely when
higher dose regimes are
used, including those where the mother is able to self - administer extra doses, although it also seems that there are wide differences in individual newborn sensitivity.81
Epidural analgesia was
used by 25.4 % (n = 72)
of public care users compared with a
higher percentage 42.6 % (n = 105)
of private and semi-private care users.
The review found that midwife - led care compared to other models
of care reduces: preterm births (before 37 weeks) and overall fetal loss and neonatal death before 24 weeks (
high - certainty evidence); the
use of regional analgesia (
epidural / spinal) during labour (
high - certainty evidence); and instrumental vaginal births (
high - certainty evidence).
In those
high risk pregnancies listed, there is also a
higher risk
of needing to
use forceps, which is also much more comfortable if you have an
epidural.
This may sound counter-intuitive, but women who
used epidural pain relief have less positive feelings about their birth experience than women who
use no medical pain relief.7, 8 No matter what methods
of pain relief a woman
used, low levels
of pain have not been found to be associated with
high levels
of enjoyment during labor.9 So what matters for a good birth experience?
And today, more than a third
of American babies are born via surgery — a rate even obstetricians» groups acknowledge is too
high — while the majority
of U.S. births involve the
use of epidural anesthesia or the labor - inducing drug Pitocin.
When
epidural methods are
used, clinicians can not give patients easy - to -
use,
high potency blood thinners, but must instead
use alternatives, which in some require frequent monitoring
of blood parameters via a test called International Normalized Ratio.