Sentences with phrase «highest acceptable rating»

Not exact matches

Given persistently high rates of youth unemployment — at 13.6 percent, more than double the national average — selecting an entrepreneurial path represents not only an acceptable choice for youth, but a strategic decision.

As a general rule, countries attempt to keep inflation fixed at a rate of 2 percent as moderate levels of inflation are acceptable, with high levels of deflation leading to economic stagnation.

Third, on - going (and possibly higher) structural deficits are acceptable provided they are the result of investments to strengthen economic growth, financed by long - term interest rates low enough to make them affordable.

Even with high unemployment rates, staffing companies have maintained acceptable earnings due to strong demand and pricing despite market fears.

The burger was dubbed «exceptional,» the highest designation on the list, while the line's Tex - Mex burger was given an «acceptable» rating, the second - highest category on the list.

If properly trained midwives exclude higher risk patients in advance, then why is their death rate acceptable only in a study that has much stricter criteria for inclusion than real life?

This could be the year when mothers and care providers stand together and say that the high rate of traumatic birth is not acceptable, and it's time that we do something about it.

That year, at least 25 percent of all tested students in a high school were required to pass the 10th - grade exit exam in each subject in order for the school to receive an Acceptable rating.

Arlington Assistant Superintendent Warren Hopkins said the district's high dropout rate isn't acceptable and that graduating on time isn't as important as staying in school.

In follow up to legislation opposed by TCTA and passed last session allowing school districts rated acceptable or higher to become «innovation districts» that can be exempt from major provisions of the Education Code, the Texas Education Agency issued proposed rules and held a public hearing April 25, 2016, to receive input.

Limited Exemption — All new charter school Executives and Central Administrative Officers who have operated campuses that have all been rated «Acceptable» or higher for at least 2 of the last 3 most recent ratings need only to complete a total of 21 hours of training provided by a TEA registered trainer within their first year of service.

Limited Exemption — All new charter holder and / or charter school Board Members who have operated charters or campuses that have all been rated «Acceptable» or higher for at least 2 of the last 3 most recent ratings need only to complete a total of 8 hours of board training provided by a TEA registered trainer within their first year of service.

This is a high - stakes assessment, with a school's overall passing rate (along with percentages of drop - outs and attendance levels) determining its designation as either exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or low - performing.

Postscript: On August 7, 2015, the teachers, non-teaching staff, parents, and students of Eastside Memorial High School were notified that their school has reached a rating of «acceptable» on the STAAR (formerly the TAKS the state's primary statewide testing assessment) for the first time in 10 years and was rated the number school in the state for achieving academic progress over a single academic year.

Returning charter school Campus Administrators who have operated charters that have all been rated «Acceptable» or higher for at least 2 of the last 3 most recent ratings may choose any 5 hours of training that is documented by an registered provider in fulfillment of its academic mission, responsibilities, and accountabilities under the law.

Partially Accredited: Warned School - Graduation and Completion Index — High schools that have achieved the adjusted SOL pass rates required for full accreditation, but that are not within a narrow margin of, nor making acceptable progress toward, achieving the GCI required for full accreditation

[ref] «Applicant pool ratings: 1) Few or minimally qualified applicants; 2) Some acceptable applicants; 3) Many acceptable applicants; 4) Some high - quality applicants; 5) Many high - quality applicants» (Connecticut State Department of Education, 2015b.

The Buick Envision received the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Top Safety Pick Plus rating for earning the highest rating of good (out of a possible good, acceptable, fair and poor) in all crashworthiness tests and a score of advanced (out of a possible not available, basic, advanced and superior) in front crash prevention with optional equipment.

The Toyota RAV4 is also an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Top Safety Pick, having received the institute's highest rating of good (on a scale of poor, marginal, acceptable and good) in side and small - and moderate - overlap frontal crash tests, along with tests of its roof strength, head restraints and seats.

The S60 was awarded the Institute's second highest rating of «acceptable» in the side test.

IRVINE, Calif., November 3, 2017 — The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has awarded its best rating possible, Top Safety Pick Plus (TSP +), to 2018 Kia Souls when equipped with high - intensity discharge (HID) headlights — offered on the Primo Lit package — and 2018 Kia Sportages built after June 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated HID headlights that are standard on the SX Turbo trim.

2 2017 Kia Forte built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and high intensity discharge (HID) headlights with Dynamic Bending Light; 2017 Optima built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and LED headlights with High Beam Assist, 2017 Cadenza when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights, and 2018 Sorento built after May 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Limited and the SX with Advanced Technology packhigh intensity discharge (HID) headlights with Dynamic Bending Light; 2017 Optima built after March 2017 when equipped with optional front crash prevention and LED headlights with High Beam Assist, 2017 Cadenza when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights, and 2018 Sorento built after May 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Limited and the SX with Advanced Technology packHigh Beam Assist, 2017 Cadenza when equipped with optional front crash prevention and specific headlights, and 2018 Sorento built after May 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Limited and the SX with Advanced Technology package.

1 2018 Kia Souls when equipped with high - intensity discharge (HID) headlights (Primo Lit package) and 2018 Sportages built after June 2017 when equipped with newly acceptable - rated headlights offered on the SX Turbo trim.

It also receives the second highest rating of» «acceptable»» in frontal offset impact tests conduced by the IIHS.

Without high - beam assist, the same headlights rate acceptable.

It also earned the second - highest rating of Acceptable in the small - overlap small - impact tests.

IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

ARLINGTON, Va. — The redesigned Honda Odyssey maintains the minivan's good ratings in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's crashworthiness tests and is available with two things the previous version lacked — a high - performing automatic braking system and acceptable headlights.

2018 IIHS Top Safety Pick + when equipped with optional Automatic Emergency Braking and High Beam Assist on vehicles built after December 2017 To qualify for 2018 TOP SAFETY PICK +, a vehicle must earn good ratings in the driver - side small overlap front, moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as an acceptable or good rating in the passenger - side small overlap front test.

In the sub categories for each of the crash ratings, there was only one that was not a top score and it was an acceptable rating, the second highest rating.

The Chevrolet Spark was the only car that earned the second - highest rating of «acceptable.»

The award is given to vehicles with a good or acceptable small overlap rating, good ratings in four other occupant protection tests, and a rating of basic or higher for front crash prevention.

Of its four tests, the frontal offset test, side impact test, roof strength test and rear crash protection / head restraint test, the Suzuki Equator scored a highest possible grade of «Good» on three, with a second highest possible rating of «Acceptable» on the rear crash protection test.

For example, the 4 - door Civic earns a good rating in the Institute's side test and is a Top Safety Pick while the 2 - door version is rated acceptable in the side test because of higher forces on the driver dummy's chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

In IIHS crash - testing, the Mustang coupe rated Good in every category except for the small overlap front test where it scored Acceptable, the second highest rating.

Titan's roof strength clocked an «Acceptable» (the second highest IIHS rating).

For a vehicle to earn an IIHS Top Safety Pick, the highest safety rating awarded by the IIHS, it must achieve at least good ratings in the moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests, as well as a good or acceptable rating in the small overlap front test.

The award is given to vehicles with a good or acceptable small overlap rating, good ratings in four other occupant protection tests, and a rating of basic or higher for front crash prevention -

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the Veloster the highest possible rating of «Good» in the moderate - overlap frontal - offset and roof - strength tests, with the second - highest rating of «Acceptable» for side - crash protection.

The basic halogen lights on the Honda Accord sedan earn an acceptable rating, while an LED system with high - beam assist available on the Accord earns only a marginal.

The midsize SUV qualifies for the highest award from IIHS, thanks to newly available acceptable - rated headlights.

The 2017 - 18 Mercedes - Benz GLC, a midsize luxury SUV, earns the highest award from IIHS, thanks to good crashworthiness ratings, a superior - rated standard front crash prevention system and available good - or acceptable - rated headlights.

The Volvo S60 earns the second - highest rating of acceptable.

Only one model, the Mitsubishi Galant, earned the second - highest rating of acceptable.

To attain «Top Safety Pick +» honors, a vehicle must earn the highest rating of «Good» for 2017 in five crashworthiness tests; an «Advanced» or «Superior» rating for front crash prevention; and an «Acceptable» or «Good» headlight rating.

The Buick Lucerne and Hyundai Azera, also equipped with standard side airbags, earn the second - highest rating of acceptable.

The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.

It earned the second - highest rating of acceptable for protection against whiplash in rear impacts.

«Last year a car could win with an acceptable rating in the rear test instead of the highest rating of good, and electronic stability control wasn't considered.

The Smart earns the highest rating of good compared with acceptable for the Honda Fit, Hyundai Accent, Mini Cooper and Toyota Yaris.