I think when it comes down to it, authors really must approach this from
the highest ethical standpoint, and that is: don't ask your friends to review your books on Amazon or other sites — at all, even for no compensation.
Not exact matches
Before this starts to sound like the annual lecture from management — perhaps you're one of those corporate employees forced to sleepwalk through an intranet quiz once in a while to prove to your
higher - ups that you're familiar with the company's code of conduct — consider DeMars's argument for the value of the
ethical office from a personal
standpoint: «In order to live happily and at peace with ourselves, we have to live in ways that are congruent with our morals,» she argues.
Is the message that gets the
highest level of engagement always the «right» message, from an
ethical standpoint?
And some of his methods are questionable both from an
ethical standpoint and in how realistic it is that a beginning investor not connected to the media would be able to pull them off — for example, Cramer would buy a lot of stock in a company right before writing about it in his Smart Money article, which would then drive the price
higher.