Sentences with phrase «highest scenario considered»

Not exact matches

We then use that to build out two additional scenarios: one assuming a doubling of the current minimum wage plus factoring in the cost of fire and building safety improvements based on data from the Worker Rights Consortium; and another using a «living wage» figure from the East Asia labour organization Asia Floor Wage, which is considered at the high end of labour reform demands.

The 1970s were clearly an extreme example of high inflation and might be considered a worst - case scenario for inflation risk.

A break of any of these support or resistance levels is likely to occur as a result of a fundamental rerelease, so to indicate which of the two scenarios (long or short) is the higher probability the week's data schedule should be considered.

According to Jim Peebles of Princeton University, Lemaitre's framework for cosmology is still relevant today because it «consider [s] scenarios for the evolution of structure that start at high redshift with initial conditions that do not seem unduly conjured, evolve accordingto accepted laws of physics, and end up looking more or less like the universe we observe.»

Imagine this scenario: young men receive high level positions in government based on the hard work of their fathers, many of whom are considered «heroic, honorable, pro-life advocates that have dedicated their lives to God's work and saving unborn babies,» according to the source.

The consequences of the three other scenarios, which range as high as total carbon emissions of 5,120 billion tons, are substantially greater and should be considered «increasingly likely» given contemporary growth in carbon emissions, according to the report.

«The fact that 17 out of the 40 SREES scenarios explore alternative technological development pathways under a high growth... scenario family A1 does not constitute a statement that such scenaarios should be considered as more likely than others..., nor that a similar large number of technological bifurcation scenarios would not be possible in any of the other three scenario families» (Nakicenovic et al, 2003, «IPCC SRES Revisited: A Response», Energy & Environment, 14, 2 & 3, 2003: 195).

Despite the gloom of this scenario, it is refreshing to see that Mr. Tucker — and others, including Henry Levin of Stanford University's Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance — are willing to consider the real implications of a high - technology economy.

I've put together a list of possible scenarios that might cause a family to consider transferring high schools and detailed out possible next steps.

Considering the current scenario in the Indian market where under the GST, hybrids are being taxed at a higher rate, this move from Mahindra does come as a jolt.

All things considered, premier, you get yourself an all around inquired about papers that is composed inside your guidelines and has all odds of getting you an high grade at school or college.AS there lot of fake sites are existing, they are trying to loot you by giving counterfeited papers, best case scenario, making the likelihood of having the capacity to purchase investigation article online safe look extremely alluring.

Dear Sandeep, ROI @ 11.86 % is a bit on higher side, considering the current interest rate scenario.

PMI is required by the lender in the event the loan - to - value ratio is greater than 80 %, which is considered a high - risk scenario.

But his point is to take the scenario out far enough so that you consider a period of high - cost care.

The CEO & board can write the same kind of story with Donegal...] Rather than seizing on Scenario C, simply because it offers the highest NAV per share potential, we may need to consider a compromise.

Let's consider this scenario Company XYZ is trading at 100 $, as stated above buyer wants to purchase at lower price and seller at higher price, this information will be available in Market depth, let's consider there are 5 buyers...

You can quibble about the high levels of stock exposure and no doubt it will be a slightly different scenario for Canadians, but the gist of Cook's approach is to at least consider the effect of far greater stock exposure than old rules of thumb (notably that fixed income should equal your age) have hitherto suggested.

«The fact that 17 out of the 40 SREES scenarios explore alternative technological development pathways under a high growth... scenario family A1 does not constitute a statement that such scenaarios should be considered as more likely than others..., nor that a similar large number of technological bifurcation scenarios would not be possible in any of the other three scenario families» (Nakicenovic et al, 2003, «IPCC SRES Revisited: A Response», Energy & Environment, 14, 2 & 3, 2003: 195).

And we laypeople should be considering worst - case scenarios (even though highly improbable), not best - case scenarios, since the stakes are so high — hope for the best, expect the worst.

There may be more to consider under such a high emissions scenario.

The unfolding oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico shows what can happen when planners don't adequately consider scenarios in girding against «low probability, high consequence» risks.

If you don't like comparisons being made between observations and Scenario A (because it wasn't considered to be very likely), then how do you feel about advertising outcomes produced with the high - end SRES scenarios (when they aren't very likely either)?

Actual and projected emission levels are already at the high end of Hansen's «alternative scenario» which was suggested as an achievable outcome (based on significant control efforts) that kept forcings (including Co2, CH4 and black carbon) below a level that Hansen considered would be «dangerous» (specifically a level that would avoid the melting of any significant fraction of the WAIS or Greenland ice sheet).

The draft's authors suggest that under the worst - case emissions scenario the modelers considered, global sea levels could rise by up to 1 meter by the end of the century, about two centimeters higher than the top of the range offered in 2007.

(2007) • Contribution of Renewables to Energy Security (2007) • Modelling Investment Risks and Uncertainties with Real Options Approach (2007) • Financing Energy Efficient Homes Existing Policy Responses to Financial Barriers (2007) • CO2 Allowance and Electricity Price Interaction - Impact on Industry's Electricity Purchasing Strategies in Europe (2007) • CO2 Capture Ready Plants (2007) • Fuel - Efficient Road Vehicle Non-Engine Components (2007) • Impact of Climate Change Policy Uncertainty on Power Generation Investments (2006) • Raising the Profile of Energy Efficiency in China — Case Study of Standby Power Efficiency (2006) • Barriers to the Diffusion of Solar Thermal Technologies (2006) • Barriers to Technology Diffusion: The Case of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (2006) • Certainty versus Ambition — Economic Efficiency in Mitigating Climate Change (2006) • Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation: Institutional and Operational Issues (2006) • Sectoral Approaches to GHG Mitigation: Scenarios for Integration (2006) • Energy Efficiency in the Refurbishment of High - Rise Residential Buildings (2006) • Can Energy - Efficient Electrical Appliances Be Considered «Environmental Goods»?

The future concentrations of LLGHGs and the anthropogenic emissions of sulphur dioxide (SO2), a chemical precursor of sulphate aerosol, are obtained from several scenarios considered representative of low, medium and high emission trajectories.

It appears that the Hansen Scenario B performed fairly well, with an overestimated trend consistent with its estimate of climate sensitivity at what is now considered to be toward the high end of the likely range (although of course, Hansen continues to estimate climate sensitivity at higher levels than most other observers).

The radiative forcing estimates are based on the forcing of greenhouse gases and other forcing agents.5 The four selected RCPs were considered to be representative of the literature, and included one mitigation scenario leading to a very low forcing level (RCP2.6), two medium stabilization scenarios (RCP4.5 / RCP6) and one very high baseline emission scenarios (RCP8.5).

However, from a purely policy standpoint, it is important to consider all possible scenarios, and a very high climate sensitivity can not yet be ruled out, as Chris Colose explains (via personal communication):

Let's consider a worst - case scenario where we eventually need to extract a massive 2000 Gt of CO2 from the atmosphere via bio-CCS, direct air capture and reforestation at a high average cost of $ 150 / ton.

That and the fact that Michaels didn't tell Congress that the one scenario was considered «on the high side of reality» doesn't make for a particularly good defense of Michaels (rather damning actually).

Such biases would also affect simulations for present and future climate scenarios, highlighting the importance to carefully consider the representation of high - latitude climate and sea ice processes in coupled climate models.

In considering the full range of IPCC scenarios, global net emissions would need to begin in approximately 2070 under scenarios seeking to keep temperature increases at the possible lowest levels, and progressively later for high - temperature stabilization levels;

The IPCC does not characterize this as «business as usual» and it was selected because it was near the high end (90th percentile) of various non-mitigation scenarios, all of which could be considered to be business as usual scenarios.

For the 2020 Medium scenario the countries studied showed an average annual wind capacity factor of 23 — 25 %, rising to 30 — 40 %, when considering power production during the 100 highest peak load situations — in almost all the cases studied, it was found that wind generation produces more than average during peak load hours.

We first used the Market Approach, Guideline Company Method, to determine the indicated equity value considering four scenarios: the High Case Public Company, the Low Case Public Company, the High Case Transaction, and the Low Case Transaction.

According to Elliott Wave Theory, the current movement should reach a higher scenario through the 5th phase, from where profit taking would be considered.

We even lead in our video review of the ASUS ZenFone 2 with a scenario in which «if you break or lose that phone and need to replace it on the cheap,» you'd want to consider getting a wannabe - premium replacement for the same price you'd buy a high - end phone on a two - year cellular contract.

Many investors would consider the second scenario to carry higher risk than the first scenario.