Sentences with phrase «highly prejudicial»

Well, here are some sweeping, unscientific, and highly prejudicial remarks on volunteer canvassing for charity that are based on experience.

Furthermore, evidence, which has no probative value but is highly prejudicial to the accused, as this evidence may be, should be deemed inadmissible at trial.

Any testimony or documentation of marital troubles is highly prejudicial and has no probative value and should be excluded.

«Under these circumstances, we can not say that giving the standard change of appearance instruction was highly prejudicial to Mr. Harris,» the court wrote.

Evidence that has little probative value to the issues at trial, while being also highly prejudicial to the accused, is often not admissible at the trial.

«The verdict, while disappointing, is not surprising, given the unprecedented and highly prejudicial rulings imposed by the trial judge,» said a Morgan Stanley spokesperson.

Some of the documents and records should not have been admitted at all, as their admission was highly prejudicial and resulted in a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice.

He argued that the delay in moving forward with the charge was highly prejudicial to him.

Via Siouxsie Law I came across an interesting recent opinion of the Supreme Court of Georgia that reversed a murder conviction because the trial court allowed the prosecution to introduce «irrelevant and highly prejudicial character evidence» about a teenage defendant's «goth» lifestyle.

Besides exposing the pros and cons of jury - based trials, «Runaway Jury» sets its sights on the relationship between firearms manufacturers and gun crime — but instead of setting forth the evidence from either side and allowing viewers to reach their own verdict on such complex issues, the film presents a highly prejudicial case, leading its audience to a conclusion that is disappointingly righteous.

«In any event, the leak is certainly a highly prejudicial and perhaps politically - motivated act, which is contrary to both your non-partisan, independent function and to the bi-partisan charge of the agency by which you are employed — that is, if you or your office was responsible, directly or indirectly,» Laufer wrote to Sugarman in a letter made public.

Laufer also called Friday's public disclosure of her secret memo «a highly prejudicial and perhaps politically - motivated act» and threatened reprisal, saying: «I specifically reserve all of my clients» rights and remedies to pursue action against you and your office.»

«In any event, the leak is certainly a highly prejudicial and perhaps politically - motivated act, which is contrary to both your non - partisan, independent function and to the bi-partisan charge of the agency by which you are employed — that is, if you or your office was responsible, directly or indirectly,» Laufer wrote.

Vance's statements come the day after de Blasio attorney Laurence Laufer sent a letter to the state board, characterizing its inability to keep the referral confidential as a «complete dereliction of duty» that, should the leak have come from the board itself, could be considered «highly prejudicial and perhaps politically motivated act.»

When prosecutors said in court that they wanted to introduce evidence of the convictions of other New York politicians, one of Mr. Silver's lawyers, Steven F. Molo, objected, arguing that doing so would be «highly prejudicial.»

De Blasio campaign lawyer Laurence Laufer sent a seven - page letter to Sugarman and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., who is investigating the issues raised in the letter, calling the leak a «highly prejudicial and perhaps politically - motivated act,» according to a copy obtained by DNAinfo New York.

Over the weekend, de Blasio campaign lawyer Laurence Laufer, sent a seven - page letter to Sugarman and Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., who is investigating the issues raised in the letter, calling the leak of the memo a «highly prejudicial and perhaps politically - motivated act,» according to a copy of the letter obtained by DNAinfo.

Not exact matches

After the company called federal prosecutors» contention that a hacker actually was responsible for the judge's tweet «highly inaccurate and prejudicial,» the company remained adamant that additional evidence should be allowed to rebut this «unsupported hypothesis.»

[40] This procedure was highly irregular and prejudicial to the appellant, resulting in a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice.

The confession obtained during a Mr. Big operation can be highly probative when there is confirmatory evidence and that the prejudicial effects to the accused is low.