The 3.5 - liter V6 in particular offering one of the highest outputs in the family sedan segment and performance to match, while the hybrid offers up to a claimed 51/53 city /
highway consumption figure.
The available Sport Chrono launch control option cuts the 0 - 60 mph acceleration time down by a further 0.2 - seconds in either variant and consumption figures are very similar, you can expect city /
highway consumption figures of 21/28 mpg on most models.
Not exact matches
The new Seville / Eldorado chassis featured an advanced transmission and engine control system that offered EPA fuel
consumption figures of nearly 30 mpg ‑ US (7.8 L / 100 km; 36 mpg ‑ imp) on the
highway using a small fuel injected V8.
Our short local launch day press drive, which included some twisty mountain road driving, along with straighter roads, some
highway and a bit of light off - roading resulted in a combined
consumption figure of 8.5 l / 100 km.
Consumption figures are quite good too with the Buick LaCrosse returning figures of not a sports sedan 21 mpg for the city and 31 mpg on the highway — though adding the optional all - wheel drive model (a $ 3,000 extra on the range - topping «Premium» model) does increase fuel consumption
Consumption figures are quite good too with the Buick LaCrosse returning
figures of not a sports sedan 21 mpg for the city and 31 mpg on the
highway — though adding the optional all - wheel drive model (a $ 3,000 extra on the range - topping «Premium» model) does increase fuel
consumption consumption marginally.
Acceleration in both variants is strong, the smaller engine offering fuel
consumption figures of 17mpg in city driving and 24mpg on the
highway.
When it comes to longer trips though, that fidgety
highway ride is also accompanied by a lack of overtaking ability and it is perhaps this need to keep the gas pedal pinned to the floorboards that give the Trax a middling 28 mpg combined estimated fuel
consumption figure.
The 1.0 - liter boasts the best claimed
consumption figures of 30 city MPG and 40
highway MPG with a manual gearbox.
Admittedly, the route involved a net elevation gain of almost 300 metres, but even according to the official government
figures, the 1.0's combined fuel
consumption of 7.1 L / 100 km (5.9
highway) is only 12.5 % lighter than for the 2.0 with manual transmission.
Both these engines are mated with 6 - speed automatic transmission and return fuel
consumptions figures of 17/25 mpg and 16/22 mpg respectively (city /
highway).
Fuel
consumption figures indicate the 2011 Chrysler Town & Country (which will use a 6 - speed automatic transmission), can return 17 mpg in the city and 25 mpg on the
highway.
Sure, since it has cylinder deactivation you can get close to the manufacturer claimed
highway figure (9.6 l / 100 km) if you're careful, but even so the
figure you get is still higher - at a constant speed of 105 km / h, its trip computer showed a current
consumption figure of 12.0 l / 100 km on level ground.
The company released fuel economy
figures of 20mpg (city) and 29mpg (
highway) which results into a combined fuel
consumption of 23mpg.
According to official fuel
consumption figures, the 1.8 T is between 10 and 18 percent more fuel efficient, both in the city and on the
highway, than the five - cylinder engine.
Fuel
consumption is rated at 7.6 / 5.7 L / 100 km (city /
highway) with the stickshift, and 7.2 / 5.6 with the automatic, estimates that that best the Yaris hatch's
figures of 7.7 / 6.3 (manual) and 7.8 / 6.6 (automatic).
The T5 offers EPA
consumption figures of 23/31 MPG City /
Highway, while the T6 drops to 22/29 MPG respectively.
The claimed fuel
consumption figure is an impressive 25mpg in combined city /
highway driving which is identical to the lighter coupe.
This performance potential is also complemented by good fuel
consumption figures too with up to a claimed 35 mpg in
highway driving and 26mpg in the city.
If the fuel
consumption is important to you, the company says that the 2013 FR - S returns EPA - estimated
figures of 30mpg
highway (manual) and 34mpg
highway (automatic).
While torque remains the same, power is up by 4 hp and claimed
consumption figures also improve from 23/34 mpg in city /
highway driving to 25/36 mpg which is now more competitive with the opposition.
Needless to say, this places the Mirage at the bottom of the class and despite some excellent claimed
consumption figures of 35/42 mpg in city /
highway driving, you will be hard pressed to match them as your foot will be down to the floorboards in most driving situations.
Combined with a powerful storage battery, a continuously variable transmission and a sophisticated power management system, the RX 450h offers 308 net hp while at the same time delivering impressive fuel
consumption figures of 7.5 / 8.4 / 7.9 L / 100 km city /
highway / combined.