Highway mileage drops one mile per gallon as well.
The four - wheel - drive version has the same city mileage, but
highway mileage drops to 21 mpg.
Not exact matches
Adding all - wheel - drive does lower the
mileage ratings, though, with a slight
drop to 27/42 mpg city /
highway.
EPA gas
mileage estimates are 32/41 mpg (city /
highway) for manual models; estimates
drop to 30/38 with the automatic transmission.
Together with a slight improvement in drag (its coefficient
drops one hundredth to 0.30; the Camry's is 0.28) and a slight reduction in weight — as much as 78 pounds, depending on trim — the new 2013 Altima posts big gains in EPA fuel economy: the city rating jumps from 23 mpg to 27 mpg, and
highway mileage goes from 32 mpg to a top - of - the - class 38 mpg.
The additional weight and less aerodynamic shape take their toll on the EPA fuel -
mileage rating, which
drops from 51/48 mpg city /
highway to 44/40 mpg.
As for the
mileage, the Cruze Diesel truly did hit mid-to-high-40 miles per gallon on the
highway, though it
drops precipitously at lower speeds and in the city — but it's still in the mid - to high - 20s there.
With the manual transmission fuel
mileage estimates
drop to 26 mpg city, 36 mpg
highway and 30 mpg combined.
With the CCTD's high
mileage, the price premium is easier to justify if you do a lot of
highway driving — especially at this point in time when diesel prices have
dropped below those for gas in some states such as Illinois and Wisconsin.
In the manual model the
mileage drops to 24 city / 32
highway.
In the case of the TrailBlazer EXT, that's $ 1,500 and a
drop in EPA - rated fuel
mileage from 16 miles per gallon city, 22 mpg
highway, to 15 and 19.
I certainly can't argue with the results though... my average gas
mileage has been a jaw -
dropping 41.5 mpg in combined
highway and local driving.
The
mileage has
dropped a little, but I think that may be partially due to the newer tires (AT tires instead of
highway... not as comfortable!)
Those looking for the best fuel economy should stick to the two - wheel drive version, as bumping up to all - wheel drive sees a significant
drop in
highway mileage.
Fuel
mileage for the front - wheel drive edition of the vehicle is 34 miles per gallon in the city and 31 miles per gallon on the
highway, while choosing optional four - wheel drive
drops economy to 29 miles per gallon in the city and 27 miles per gallon on the
highway.
Well, except for one not - so - good thing — the test Citadel V - 6 was EPA - rated at 16 mpg city, 23 mpg
highway, while the V - 8 «s
mileage drops to 14 mpg city, 20
highway.
But the extra performance
drops the gas
mileage down to 34 miles per gallon on the
highway and 26 miles per gallon in the city with the manual gearbox (32/23 for the automatic).»
For the 2008 Fit, despite the fact that it's the same car, the EPA ratings will
drop to 27 mpg city, 34 mpg
highway, not because the 2008 Fit gets worse
mileage, but because the EPA has changed its testing methods to better reflect the real world.
Only let down is fuel
mileage, city driving not so good,
highway driving has
dropped too, avg is around 23 - 25, on the
highway I can get around 26 - 30 depending on speed.
The six - speed
drops 2 mpg in city
mileage from the CVT to 22 city / 32
highway.
Fuel
mileage drops about 2 MPG in city,
highway and combined fuel economy by selecting the manual.
Selecting the manual means you get a V8 engine in the R / T, and fuel
mileage drops to 15 city / 23
highway.
It's standard with the manual transmission but unfortunately, fuel
mileage drops significantly to 22 city / 30
highway from the automatic's 25 city / 34
highway.