Please don't
hijack the science, and tell people like me, who understand most of the science (other than the intricacies of climate models) better than 99 % of US citizens, and have followed the science better than 99.8 % of US citizens, that we don't know what we are talking about.
Atheist attempt to
hijack science with the symbol of atom makes me laugh!
Atheist
hijack science to answer the same questions that religion tries answer.
This article by Dr. Wickman, and some of the commenters are trying to
hijack science to bolster their intuition and claim that the Big Bang, or the Anthropic Principle proves God.
You said, «in the second sentence
you hijack science and rob other humans of the seperate realm.»
Today's political «climate» (pun intended) has unfortunately
hijacked science itself for ones» own political agenda.
Not exact matches
@eqlizer: The problem is that Christians more so than any other theist group are trying to
hijack history (U.S. is a Christian nation) and
science (Intelligent Design), rebrand it with Christian bias, and sell it for public consumption.
If
science allows itself to be
hijacked by fundamentalists, whether religious or anti-religious, its intellectual integrity is subverted and its cultural authority is compromised.
I always attributed this disconnect to my general frustrations with modern evangelicalism — that it's been
hijacked by the Republican Party, that it's in a perpetual state of defensiveness and «wartime» posturing, that it has closed itself off to
science and independent thought, that it has lost sight of the message of Jesus regarding the Kingdom of God, that it has become commercialized and shallow — all the things we «emergers» like to write books and articles about.
The OP (he was posting under different names for a few hours) about religious people «
hijacking»
science.
I've seen plenty of religious and non-religious people attempt to «
hijack»
science and fail.
Ok we cant deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that
science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets
hijacked and twisted and changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets denied by the same people.
I'm sorry but I find this offensive... It's like churches want to
hijack the benefits
science has brought to the healing of AIDS patients as a miracle of their god.
The finding warrants research into adding drugs that could prevent the cancer from
hijacking patients» repressive gene regulatory machinery, which might allow the original therapy to work long enough to eradicate the tumor, the researchers report in their National Institutes of Health - funded study, published in the current issue of
Science Translational Medicine.
They are
hijacking information from the host,» said Westwood, who is affiliated with the Fralin Life
Science Institute.
Ideologues will continue to exist, on both sides, and the political game is only too happy to perpetuate the fight,
hijacking both
science and religion for its own ends.
Commenting on the panel and its critics, Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for
Science Education in Oakland, California, which has campaigned successfully for the teaching of evolution in schools, objected to the «hijacking» of science for arguments about religion: for or a
Science Education in Oakland, California, which has campaigned successfully for the teaching of evolution in schools, objected to the «
hijacking» of
science for arguments about religion: for or a
science for arguments about religion: for or against.
«I was used,» says Neil Shubin, a paleontologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois, who worries that
science has been «
hijacked» to promote a product.
It also becomes clear here that
science is often
hijacked as a vehicle for national / imperial pride, and becomes a battleground for competing states.
► «[F] raudsters are snatching entire Web addresses, known as Internet domains, right out from under academic publishers, erecting fake versions of their sites, and
hijacking their journals, along with their Web traffic,» John Bohannon wrote, also in this week's
Science.
Study co-author Dr Enrico Costanza, from the Agents, Interaction, Complexity Group in Electronics and Computer
Science at the University of Southampton, says: «IoT objects can be attacked and possibly
hijacked, putting our privacy, data and safety in question.
A study published today in
Science shows that the Zika virus
hijacks a human protein called Musashi - 1 (MSI1) to allow it to replicate in, and kill, neural stem cells.
Her STAT story «Gene Drive Gives Scientists Power to
Hijack Evolution» (featured on Showcase) won the 2017 Victor Cohn Prize for Medical
Science Reporting.
In these times it seems as if people who are comfortable with quantitative skills can
hijack and railroad conversations about policy,
science, or pretty much anything even when they are horribly, catastrophically wrong.
While I can't imagine the circumstances where a person would suffer serious health consequences or death from using Crest vs. Colgate, Pepto vs. Kaopectate, or
Science Diet vs. Purina Pro Plan, there are many far - from - safe products and procedures
hijacking the «veterinarian recommended» claim.
As I explained in my first blog post, I see the
hijacking of
science by TNR opponents as a significant barrier to developing sound public policy.
Hijacking a phrase from The Drowned World, J.G. Ballard's first
science fiction novel and one of his London - based dystopic tales, Walled Gardens in an Insane Eden portrays the world we live in today: on the precipice but hopeful for a less fragile future.
That's how
science moves forward, that's what keeps
science progressing, is... what I would call a good faith, honest debate between scientists... To some extent, this good faith debate has been
hijacked.
So this is not really the «debate» that the contrarians would like to make it out to be, and most scientists, as well as people who have accepted that climate
science points to the need for stronger action, have no more interest in letting the Heartland and NIPCC folks
hijack the public discourse and getting the media to frame the narrative in their terms.
Science has to be purified of corruption and
hijacking by post-normalists.
In 1991, it was nothing more than a suggestion to invite
science - based rebuttal back into an issue Al Gore and his friends
hijacked with assertions that catastrophic man - caused global warming was settled
science; a suggestion which came out of a leaked non-profit coal association's public relations test market campaign which was so obscure that practically no one ever saw or heard about it.
When an area of
science mutates into pseudo-
science and attracts a large following, it is always
hijacked by political forces, which give it a whole new and terrible dimension.
The problem is that a small group, calling it
science,
hijacked an idea and subordinated everything to that.
Climate
science was
hijacked for a political agenda that is now achieved.
This thread has been
hijacked by a series of trolls who have attempted to deflect any serious discussion of the subject of this thread and / or of climate
science.
This isn't the first time
science has been
hijacked for political ends - remember eugenics - and it won't be the last.
The present situation is squarely to be blamed on (a) the success of political conservatism in ensuring economic progress, thereby depriving political left of virtually all oxygen in this area (as in, no credible lefty argues for a traditional left position), and (b) the failure of political conservatism in not caring for
science and allowing «
science» to be completely
hijacked by the political left, to be used as a tool and flag - standard.
In the US,
science has been
hijacked by partisan politics.
Mann's hockey stick vastly expanded the market for such cartoon certainties, and enabled the climate apocalyptics to
hijack an entire field of
science.
First you if you cherish the objectivity of
science then you would strive to ensure all hypotheses are well vetted, and not
hijacked by politics.
Maybe you think we should place politically motivated constraints on people, but that would seem to then make it difficult to prevent
science from being
hijacked by politics.
In the interview Mörner tells
science journalist Alex Reichmuth that climate and sea level
science has been completely politicized and
hijacked by an activist agenda and has become a «quasi religion».
It just seems climate
science has been
hijacked by the likes of the UN and IPCC.
Then you have the ones who work directly in climate
science, which has obviously become
hijacked by CAGW, and almost entirely reduced to it.
We face a tremendous gap between what scientists warn about the dangers of global warming and what the public understands, and a discourse that has been
hijacked by toxic, politically motivated attacks on the credibility of the climate
science community.
We went through this about 100 years ago when some racists and bigots temporarily
hijacked evolutionary
science.
The long term cooling trend of the Holocene since the Climatic Optimum (aka the Holocene Optimum) was an established fact even before alarmist lame brains tried to
hijack climate
science and turn it into a cult.
Yes, the implication that the scientists who do research on sea level rise, like Mitrovica, have somehow violated Feynman's
science, and Feynman is not alive and can not defend himself from the
hijacking of his reputation.
The recent hype about declining moose populations is just one more example of global warming advocates
hijacking and denigrating ecological
science.
Lindzen's paper is required reading in order to understand how certain individuals with an agenda have
hijacked climate
science.