The Campbells» effort to unite Christians on the foundation of what they perceived to be the New Testament pattern of preaching and discipline thus included an iconoclastic attack on
the historic traditions of the churches.
Not exact matches
The Pelikan volume on the Book
of Acts sets a very high standard for a series that promises to make a
historic contribution to understanding the Bible within the living
tradition that is the
Church.
Upon the basis
of Paul's teaching, taken alone, Christianity might possibly have foundered a century later in the rising sea
of Gnosticism; possessing Mark's compilation
of the
historic traditions, later amplified by the other evangelists, the
church held true to its course, steering with firm, unslackened grip upon the
historic origins
of its faith.
With today's Catholic universities drifting away from any recognizable connection to the Catholic
tradition, dioceses closing parochial schools, and the
Church's ability to influence politics at a
historic low, it's absurd to speak
of a «resurgent» integralism.
the truth
of God can be or has been captured in the ex-cathedra utterances
of the bishop
of Rome — the idolatry
of many who like to pretend that ultimate truth has been captured in the ecumenical councils
of the early
church, in the
historic creeds, or in the «unbroken
tradition of the catholic faith,» which usually is the same thing as the speaker's special prejudice.
Methodists have said «the LDS
Church is not a part
of the
historic, apostolic
tradition of the Christian faith.»
And
of the rising influence
of Pentecostal
churches and the relative waning
of churches in the
historic confessional
traditions?
Indeed, I'm trying to remember when I last encountered an argument for changing the
church's
historic view
of marriage that engaged so flippantly and superficially with the Christian
tradition.
But for many
churches in the «90s the return to the
tradition of the
church catholic will mean an increasing reliance on the
historic experience
of the
church at worship.
Much
of the recent theological reflection on martyrdom has come from thinkers in the Anabaptist
tradition — not surprising, perhaps, since that
church's
historic refusal to use violence often resulted in Anabaptists being targets
of violence.
One is the desire to understand the gospel and the
historic Christian
tradition as fully as possible, to grasp the objective foundation
of the ministry and the
church.
Some
of these, like the
Church of South India, united Reformed
churches with
churches of traditions that hold to the necessity
of the
historic episcopate.
What is especially intriguing, moreover, is the observable convergence
of these essays, despite incidental disagreements and the very different strata
of Christian
tradition on which they draw, towards a point
of intersection that is difficult to describe but seems to be very near the heart
of the mystery whose herald and sign the
historic church has claimed to be.
Last week, the Eastern Orthodox
Church, a communion
of 14 autocephalous, national
churches with roots in the Byzantine Christian
tradition, concluded an
historic synod on the island
of Crete.
And it is through such movements that the
historic churches in countless ways are being called not to an entire abandonment
of their respective
traditions and perspectives, but back to the simplicity
of the Gospel and ultimately to their First Love Himself.