By taking
the historical average dividend growth rate for at least five years, you have a baseline to go off of to increase or decrease your forecasted dividend growth rate.
Not exact matches
There's plenty of
historical evidence that suggests this
dividend growth fund should continue to beat and exceed the market
average with less volatility.
My problem is that when i look for stocks i set very strict parameter rules like: — minimum
dividend growth rate of 7 - 10 % in last years 10, 5 years
average —
historical stocks that increased
dividend at least for the last 15 years or paid historically (like BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA)-- very low debt — low payout ratio — historically (long term) stock price has been increasing etc...
There's plenty of
historical evidence that suggests this
dividend growth fund should continue to beat and exceed the market
average with less volatility.
With 7 % upside on top of a yield that's higher than its recent
historical average, this
dividend growth stock deserves a good look here.
Absolute Valuation Models We begin with a discussion of the two absolute valuation models named in Table 1: Model 1, the
average of
dividend yield and earnings yield; and Model 2,
dividend yield plus
historical average real
growth.
Pfizer had an excellent history of
dividend growth with a
historical average of over 18 % per year before cutting it by 50 % in 2009 to $ 0.64 per share on an annual basis.
With the potential for 35 % upside on top of a yield that's well above its recent
historical average, there could be a huge opportunity for long - term
dividend growth investors here.
Since the current payout ratios are slightly higher than the company's
historical average, investors should probably expect annual
dividend growth that's slightly less than EPS and FCF
growth, along the lines of 6 % to 8 % a year.