All HONEST Atheists don't deny
the historical fact of the existence or even death of Jesus of Nazareth, they only deny they «why»
Not exact matches
It's
historical fact that Christianity was almost entirely led by pacifists for the first 300 years
of its
existence.
historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any
historical evidence
of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens...
historical evidence - no remains, no proof
of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life
of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the
fact is, there is not a single proving evidence
of Jesus's life in an
historical context... there is no
existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...
There is lots more — on contraception, on same - sex unions, on women, on the Second World War, and, going right back to basics, on the
historical fact of Christ's
existence.
This may help us to see why the Bible, in spite
of the
fact that it was turning men away from the gods
of mankind's infancy, was quite vigorous in retaining God - talk to point to the deepest reality man encounters in his
historical existence.
However, my interest lies in the actual and effective emergence
of a new structure
of existence, and as a matter
of historical fact, this occurred only by the total impact
of Jesus» transformation
of Jewish teaching combined with his resurrection appearances.
@thecollegeadmissionsguru «I would be more interested in how you defend the
fact that there is NOT ONE single piece
of evidence
of the
existence of a
historical Jesus.»
While you may not believe in God, the man named Jesus, or any other deity, there is in
fact,
historical evidence pointing at least to the possibility
of the
existence of the man named Jesus and that many, many people were willing to change their lives, risk their lives and even be persecuted and executed in the name
of this man named Jesus.
These are manifestly questions
of historical fact, and one does not see how the answer to them can decide offhand the still further question:
of what use should such a volume, with its manner
of coming into
existence so defined, be to us as a guide to life and a revelation?
Notwithstanding the
fact that whatever human meaning we may discover would be inseparable from the meaning
of the cosmos, it is still necessary for us to focus our quest for the meaning
of revelation on the question
of the significance
of our own
existence as a distinctly
historical species.
The
historical fact for a contemporary is that the God has come into
existence; for the member
of a later generation the
historical fact is that the God has been present through having come into
existence.
One must investigate the theological significance
of the very
fact of the
existence of the synoptic tradition, and the significance
of its essential nature, in order to throw light on the problem
of the
historical Jesus.
Records substantiate the
existence of short, square, «under the table» dogs from at least 1000 B.C.. By piecing together
historical facts and documented records, it is possible to some extent to follow the development in China
of the breeding
of dogs likely to be the ancestors
of the present - day Shih Tzu.
The purveyors
of the new eco-religion can try to deny its
existence as much as they want and the
fact that there is more than enough
historical evidence that it was at least as warm (more likely significantly warmer) during this period
of the millenial past than it may have been during the recent warming period at the end
of the 20th century.
Unlike those who were sympathetic to the United States or pro-American in past
historical periods, the continentalists
of today accept Canada's
existence only as an establish
fact, not as a matter
of conviction...