Sentences with phrase «historical name of»
The real historical name of the product is Inca Inchi.
https://changinghabits.com.au/ Not exact matches
The Anne Frank Foundation said it recognized the «good intentions» of those who name things after Frank, but pointed out that the significance of Frank and what she represents «will increasingly have a contemporary rather than a historical basis.»
Looking for an outstanding first - person shooter with historical context not named Call of Duty?
Dates of historical events, mathematical formulas, the name of specific biological structures or whatever.
The chart depicts observed historical risk based on the performance of broad diversified indexes named in the disclosure for the chart «Drifting into risk as stock markets rise.»
However, following this offering, the salary and bonus payments to our senior Carlyle professionals, including our named executive officers, will be reflected as compensation expense in our financial statements and we have reflected these amounts in the applicable columns of the Summary Compensation Table below even though they are not recorded as compensation expense in our historical financial statements.
Today, the industrial portion of the name Dow Jones Industrial Average is largely there for historical reasons, since many of the 30 companies currently on the list has little or nothing to do with traditional heavy industry.
Some current stocks from my portfolio that are trading at current low and historical PEs include, W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) to name a couple.
Looking at TSLA's historical short interest chart and one can see that the negative investor sentiment or volume of shares sold short continues to decline, a far departure from June when Tesla was named the largest shortest stock in the U.S. equity market.
As recently as yesterday I stated (again) that I do not dispute the historical existence of some dude named jesus.
@HotAirAce «The Babble and jesus myth are complete crap» @HotAirAce «I do not dispute the historical existence of some dude named jesus.»
Many may not agree with me, but religion has played a crucial role in keeping order in the society historically that is a lot more in magnitude than historical violence in the name of religion.
The Bible contains a lot of interesting stories, talks between people, between God (Jesus) and people, wisdom (proverbs), prophecy (revelation), words of salvation (the 4 gospels, the epistles), historical data, like dates, locations, names of people involved in the stories, parables, reports about miracles, Jesus did, songs, prayers, psalms etc...
Does «Christ» name only the past historical figure of Jesus or the past event in which he was central?
, in a chapter of that name, Kirk demonstrates the historical absurdity of asking whether Jesus was a feminist.
Historical Jesus Theories, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of many of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thHistorical Jesus Theories, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of many of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thhistorical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on the subject.
The former would tend to minimize the centrality of the historical Jesus in the religion named after him and would turn Christianity into a mere symbol.
New Testament Scholars tell us that there are only three historical facts that we can be certain of about Jesus: (a) Jesus was part of the Kingdom of God movement, the belief in the divine sovereignty of Israel, and the desire for the divine expulsion of the Romans, (b) when Jesus came to Jerusalem to advance this movement, he was crucified, a penalty reserved specifically for those who posed a political or financial threat to the Roman Peace, and (c) a sect of the Kingdom of God movement continued in Jesus» name and memory, which was active in Jerusalem, and which lasted until 70 CE when the city was sacked and all the many different Zealot sects there were put down.
The scope of this variety can be indicated by the mere mention of the names of men who figured in this historical revolution in fundamental notions, far example, Schelling, Herbart (a contemporary of Schelling), Schopenhauer, Feuerbach, Marx, Hartmann, Nietzsche, Freud, Bergson, and William James.
there was no historical man named jesus the whole story of jesus is the story of the SUN... go figure
To wait for another historical destiny, or to speak the name of God in the presence of his absence, is to renounce the very reality of the Incarnation, and to close himself to the presence of Jesus.
In this case «God» names some aspect of natural or historical reality, and if «God» names Jesus or what may be called the Christ - event, then there is no reference of the word «God» except Jesus or the Christ - event.
We could point to examples of semantic structure, grammatical style, references to culture, and a whole host of other historical critical standards to prove by scholarly consensus that the author whose name is on the book did not actually write it.
just to tell you this there is plenty of secular historical evidence that proves the existence of a man named Jesus during the time period described in the bible.
Historical criticism is the process by which modern scholars examine the text of ancient documents and try to determine when they were truly written and whether or not they were authored by the person whose name is on the document.
I try not to think of those historical injustices except to use my Irish surname with pride and to have my children carry Irish names even though they are half WASP.
After all, we recall, what fancy academic footwork have we not done in the name of «the quest for the historical Jesus»?
Historical Jesus Theories, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of most of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thHistorical Jesus Theories, http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of most of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thhistorical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on the subject.
Without explicitly naming Whitehead, in the article «The Historical Imagination» Collingwood rejects Whitehead's definition of «ingression»: «Nor is it possible to give an account of knowledge by combining theories of these two types.
(a) Philosophical preoccupation with the various types of cultural activities on an idealistic basis (Johann Gottfried Herder, G. W. F. Hegel, Johann Gustav Droysen, Hermann Steinthal, Wilhelm Wundt); (b) legal studies (Aemilius Ludwig, Richter, Rudolf Sohm, Otto Gierke); (c) philology and archeology, both stimulated by the romantic movement of the first decades of the nineteenth century; (d) economic theory and history (Karl Marx, Lorenz von Stein, Heinrich von Treitschke, Wilhelm Roscher, Adolf Wagner, Gustav Schmoller, Ferdinand Tonnies); (e) ethnological research (Friedrich Ratzel, Adolf Bastian, Rudolf Steinmetz, Johann Jakob Bachofen, Hermann Steinthal, Richard Thurnwald, Alfred Vierkandt, P. Wilhelm Schmidt), on the one hand; and historical and systematical work in theology (church history, canonical law — Kirchenrecht), systematic theology (Schleiermacher, Richard Rothe), and philosophy of religion, on the other, prepared the way during the nineteenth century for the following era to define the task of a sociology of religion and to organize the material gathered by these pursuits.7 The names of Max Weber, Ernst Troeltsch, Werner Sombart, and Georg Simmel — all students of the above - mentioned older scholars — stand out.
The Cult of Reason is just one historical example, with the name Cult actually built in.
Old Testament materials prepare the way for this understanding by naming the name of God in connection with historical events and by interpreting his reality, partly at least, in terms of his involvement in the fortunes of Israel.
While you may not believe in God, the man named Jesus, or any other deity, there is in fact, historical evidence pointing at least to the possibility of the existence of the man named Jesus and that many, many people were willing to change their lives, risk their lives and even be persecuted and executed in the name of this man named Jesus.
None of these businesses survive in the same organizational state as 150 years ago; some of the names are only historical reminders, left after a century of mergers and acquisitions; and many of them have already put into place elaborate affirmative hiring policies, racial sensitivity training, and programs that underwrite black education.
Stories such as those in the books of Ruth, Esther, Judith, which are nowadays taken as fictional rather than historical, use not only plenty of proper names, but often supply unnecessarily exact details.
’13 Later he writes, «The name of Joseph of Arimathea and, with it, the account of the burial of Jesus must be historical; they can not be simply discarded.»
But as both texts make clear, all writers currently adopting the brand name «Holocaust revisionism» defy or corrupt the recognized canons of historiographic investigation and truth; they distort and manipulate the historical record to create usable falsehoods that can advance the agenda of «an extreme right - wing that sees itself as heir to Nazism and dreams of its rehabilitation» (Vidal - Naquet).
The names of atheists have become obscurred in history and forgotten, but the name of Jesus Christ still stands alone as the most influential historical figure of all time.
If you are going to name your kid after a historical figure, England has lots of better names to choose from: Winston (Churchill), Charles (Darwin), Issac (Newton), William (Shakespear), John (Lennon), Oliver (Cromwell), Guy (Fawkes), Richard (III), Arthur (Wellsley or King if you prefer), and on and on.
It is not at all obvious why the mention of a proper name makes the story historical.
While absolute certainty is, of course, impossible at this late date, non-Mormon scholars are pretty well convinced that its basis was an historical novel by a one - time Presbyterian clergyman by the name of Spaulding, which he intended calling The Manuscript Found in the Wilds of Mormon or, Unearthed Records of the Nephites.
Nevertheless, they and their more speculatively and rationalistically inclined successors are not known for their efforts to isolate the common historical character of any particular society, especially as it differs from other societies, nor for their efforts to name, criticize, and reconstruct its own common good.
But in an effort to urge more of this study, I am calling for a field of concentration within the map of process thought and naming it «historical process thought.»
As the name «genetic ontology» indicates, one general assumption is that the human's statements about reality express the experience of a genesis of being — and to be sure in a phylogenetic as well as in an ontogenetic sense, that is, in the form of an historical - evolutionary as well as an individual process.
That purpose is to issue an emphatic historical reminder to all of us who criticize the ethos of objectivism in the name of communitarian accounts of knowledge and truth.
The nineteenth century saw the reality of the «historical facts» as consisting largely in names, places, dates, occurrences, sequences, causes, effects — things which fall far short of being the actuality of history, if one understands by history the distinctively human, creative, unique, purposeful, which distinguishes man from nature.
Historical Jesus Studies, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of many of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thHistorical Jesus Studies, earlychristianwritings.com/theories.htm — the names of many of the contemporary historical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on thhistorical Jesus scholars and the ti - tles of their over 100 books on the subject.
In the Hebrew canon of prophecy (the Latter Prophets) there are four «books» comprising fifteen names — Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel and the twelve «minor» prophets (the last twelve writings of our Old Testament, Hosea to Malachi) These fifteen writings vary in length, were written over a span of centuries from the eighth probably to the third B.C., are addressed to radically different historical situations, and certainly in their present form represent far more than fifteen writers.
There's a commoditized Abe, too, as Ferguson discovers ¯ the historical superstar whose name gleams among the buyers and sellers of Americana.
The use of Valignano and the name Rodrigues heightens the question of a Christianity that is faithful to Japan, especially given that both historical figures were deeply committed to cultivating an authentic Japanese form of Christianity.