Sentences with phrase «historical observation record»

Not exact matches

In addition to historical records and ground observations, the researchers will use newly available Earth System Data Records from NASA — satellite images of the Amazon and its tributaries over the complete high - and low - water records and ground observations, the researchers will use newly available Earth System Data Records from NASA — satellite images of the Amazon and its tributaries over the complete high - and low - water Records from NASA — satellite images of the Amazon and its tributaries over the complete high - and low - water cycles.
It was not until 1976 that a paper published in Science by John A. Eddy of Saginaw Valley State University renewed interest in the sun - climate relationship with a comprehensive analysis of many different historical records of solar observation.
Researchers lack an extensive historical record of bloom events and their associated toxicities to put current observations into a long - term context.
For his part, Mörner maintains that the true fate of the Maldives should be deduced from direct observation and not just from models or historical records.
«We believed from historical records and certainly knew from recent X-ray observations that this star was there,» Camilo remarked, «but despite many attempts, no one had been able to find any radio pulsations from it because the signals are, it turns out, incredibly weak.»
I've tried to explain it by the simple observation that the founder of PETA, Ingrid Newkirk, formerly held a job killing homeless dogs and cats at the Washington Humane Society, a shelter with a consistently poor record for saving lives and the subject of historical public acrimony for its over-reliance on killing.
global average sfc T anomalies [as] indicative of anomalies in outgoing energy... is not well supported over the historical temperature record in the model ensemble or more recent satellite observations
Figure 3: Historical dust veil events as noted by Stothers and Rampino (1983) in the period from 100 BC to AD 700, compared with bristlecone pine frost rings as recorded by LaMarche and Hirschboeck (1984)(†) and Salzer and Hughes (2007)(‡) and observation of ice acid in the GICC05 (Vinther et al. 2006) and NEEM S1 timescales (Sigl et al., 2013).
Yes, yes, in theory anyways, but still a no for public availability unless they have lots of money to spend on 100 year historical records and recent observations.
Once we have used real observations to understand the probability in the historical record, then we can use climate models to compare the probability in the current climate (in which global warming has occurred) with a climate in which there was no human - caused global warming.
Overall, this results in an impressively small model spread around observations over the historical record and a relatively constrained spread for each of the individual future projections.
Seeking to better understand historical changes in flooding, Do et al. (2017) analyzed records of maximum daily streamflow from 3558 locations to develop «the most comprehensive observation - based record of... streamflow at the global scale currently available.»
Here we construct a database of worldwide RS observations matched with high - resolution historical climate data and find a previously unknown temporal trend in the RS record after accounting for mean annual climate, leaf area, nitrogen deposition and changes in CO2 measurement technique.
Projections of future summer mean WBGT under the RCP8.5 emissions scenario that are constrained by observations indicate that by 2030s at least 50 % of the summers will have mean WBGT higher than the observed historical record value in all the analyzed regions, and that this frequency of occurrence will increase to 95 % by mid-century.
Climate sensitivities estimated from recent observations will therefore be biased low in comparison with CO2 - only simulations owing to an accident of history: when the efficacies of the forcings in the recent historical record are properly taken into account, estimates of [Transient Climate Respons — TCR] and [Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity — ECS] must be revised upwards.
Some are developed based on mathematical models, some from looking at historical records, some from other observations of the atmosphere.
Also, the opposite excellent point has been made about those cases where the record is unreliable, and this is another benefit of historical narrative, to tell us where we are looking not at original observations but either adjustments or wholesale falsification (for whatever original purpose, a hindrance to us now).
My comments can be assessed by reference to the actual observations of the real world since 1961 (mentioned above) which is when the Earth embarked on one of the highest periods of solar activity in the 400 year historical record.
The historical climate record and recent observations (as against fallible computer models) show that CO2 doesn't cause warming — game over for the AGW supporters, which means that the thousands on non-jobs that have been supporting this non event (hoax) need to go.
The CET record is well cross referenced by historical observations, this from Geoffrey Blainey's «A Short History of the World.»
Historical observations collected from both land and oceans provide a vital resource for climatologists, who can obtain a better understanding of past weather from such records.
The paleontological record and historical observations of species indicate that in the past species have survived climate change by their constituent populations moving to a climatically suitable area, or, if they can not move, by evolving adaptations to the new climate.
This corresponds very well to the descriptive weather observations from various historical records in this area.
Unfortunately, we are stuck with the historical temperature record, where there are only a handful of stations in the world that have remained at the exact same location with the exact same instrument and observation time with no major changes to micro - or meso - scale environments over the last 100 + years.
We can repeat our earlier observation that CET instrumental to 1659 - this time augmented by the reconstruction using historical records to 1538, demonstrates a temperature profile that looks quite different to significant periods of the remainder of the Northern Hemisphere if the official version of extended climate - as epitomised by the «Hockey stick» - is taken as the appropriate set of data which it should be measured against.
Observations of recent global warming, short - term cooling after major volcanic eruptions, cooling at the Last Glacial Maximum and other periods in the historical record, and the seasonal variation in climate, all provide some information which helps to determine the value of climate sensitivity.
NOAA and NASA independently produce a record of Earth's surface temperatures and trends based on historical observations over oceans and land.
That's according to a new review of research that combines on - the - ground observations with aerial and satellite photos, historical records and dates from cores of ice extracted from the glaciers.
Fiddling with historical temperature records achieves no more than fiddling with historical cloud cover observations, and who would bother?
Used properly, data obtained via methods including, but not limited to, third party references, historical records, interviews and direct observations should help assure that conclusions are reached only when there is data convergence.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z