The second commentary features film historian Richard Schickel giving an expectedly
historical perspective on things.
Not exact matches
Missouri Synod theologians had traditionally affirmed the inerrancy of the Bible, and, although such a term can mean many
things, in practice it meant certain rather specific
things: harmonizing of the various biblical narratives; a somewhat ahistorical reading of the Bible in which there was little room for growth or development of theological understanding; a tendency to hold that God would not have used within the Bible literary forms such as myth, legend, or saga; an unwillingness to reckon with possible creativity
on the part of the evangelists who tell the story of Jesus in the Gospels or to consider what it might mean that they write that story from a post-Easter
perspective; a general reluctance to consider that the canons of
historical exactitude which we take as givens might have been different for the biblical authors.
In this episode of the First
Things Podcast, Helen Andrews provides some
historical perspective on the choice Americans must make this November — between two styles of dictator, the personalist (Trump) and the clientelist (Clinton).
It is instructive in gaining
perspective, I believe, for us to realize that there was serious reflection
on these matters by theologians before Whitehead's work came to prominence, and to recognize that «process thought,» when we appreciate its
historical breadth and pluralism, is a many - splendored
thing.
A little
historical perspective on a committee or
on the board of directors is a good
thing.