A colleague of mine, Gary Gutting, published an article in the New York Times this past Easter arguing that the core of the Catholic faith is a commitment to an ethics of love, and that
the historical teachings of the faith are best taken as useful parables.
Not exact matches
Guiding Principles Religious and theological studies depend on and reinforce each other; A principled approach to religious values and
faith demands the intellectual rigor and openness
of quality academic work; A well - educated student
of religion must have a deep and broad understanding
of more than a single religious tradition; Studying religion requires that one understand one's own
historical context as well as that
of those whom one studies; An exemplary scholarly and
teaching community requires respect for and critical engagement with difference and diversity
of all kinds.
But then,
of course, the seminary's opponents would use similar reasoning to suggest that the church's public
teaching must regard the Jonah story as a straightforward
historical account, and soon no distinction at all would be possible between what the Bible records and what it
teaches, what is central to the
faith and what is not.
Moreover, it must be remembered that the Gospels are the records
of early Christian preaching and
teaching rather than attempts at objective
historical narrative and are thus more immediately valuable as sources for the
faith of the primitive church than for the biography
of Jesus.
A
Faith For All Seasons By Ted M. Dorman Broadman & Holman, 391 pages, $ 27.99 Coming out
of years
of teaching at Taylor University, a Christian school in Indiana, this book, written by a Protestant, evidences an admirable ecumenical and
historical reach.
These questions are not without significance, touching on the person
of Christ and the nature
of faith, and the answers will only come from an engaged discussion
of the authority
of Scripture, the
historical witness
of the church, and the clarity with which the councils, creeds, and confessions give expression to the
teaching of the Bible.
The
historical problem presented by the Gospels is, then, not the problem
of determining whether the character
of the early Christians, their
faith, and the exigencies
of their life and work have colored and overlaid the facts
of Jesus»
teaching and life, but is, rather, the problem
of determining just how we should use our knowledge
of this fact in our efforts to get back to the so - called
historical Jesus» own words and life.
This will mean making clear the authentic interpretation
of the
teaching of the
faith, challenging false interpretations, and may mean re-examination
of traditional
teaching in the current socio -
historical context.
Today both
of these things would be questioned: it is no longer self - evident that the
historical Jesus is, in fact, the central concern
of Christian
faith, and it may no longer be assumed that the major aspect
of that
faith is to follow the dictates, encouragements and challenges
of the
teaching of that Jesus.
Most books on the
teaching of Jesus have simply assumed that the results
of the
historical - critical discussion
of that
teaching were significant to Christian
faith.