As we have been urging that
historical understanding goes beyond literary and textual criticism in the direction of subjectivity, we have neglected the objectivity which is given our study by the existence of what we may call the phenomenon behind the phenomena.
Not exact matches
Dashboard Jesus (Let it also be known that in my
understanding of the
Historical Jesus, He actually knew where He was
going.
Here is another place where knowing the
historical - cultural Jewish background of the Scriptures really helps
understand what is
going on.
This is the concept of that beyond which thought can not
go, in which it completes its search for
understanding, at which it really affirms only itself, and through which it relates all else.2 Leaving aside his views on its
historical character, this is what R. G. Collingwood seems to be suggesting when he says that Anselm's argument does not prove «that because our idea of God is an ideal of id quo maius cogitari nequit therefore God exists, but that because our idea of God is an idea of id quo maius cogitari nequit we stand committed to belief in God's existence.
Rescue workers took comfort in this remnant of the building structure and they prayed to it as a religious object.But there is a difference between displaying an artifact of
historical significance and saying we want you [the public] to bless it — museum
goers understand that distinction»...
There are numerous cultural,
historical, grammatical, and contextual issues that must be researched if we are
going to
understand what Paul is saying and why.
This
goes against our best
historical understanding.
Understanding how that would affect the climate will require
going beyond
historical records of climate change, or even the information encoded in tree rings or ice cores, to what scientists call «deep time» records of conditions on Earth, according to a new NAS analysis.
Many assessments include a «
Going Deeper» video that extends teachers»
understanding of that task and the
historical skills it measures.
So if you book is on «mountain biking» you can
understand why it's not
going to score high on «french cooking» or «
historical romance».
Nonetheless, the reanalysis projects (and there are a number of them — ERA, NCEP, MERRA, JAXA) are probably the best assessment of what the
historical weather was like (back to around 1957 — though there are efforts to
go back further), as long as it is
understood that trends might not always be what they seem.
The theory of AGW is based on well
understood physics: Gilles, please
go and read this book to get an idea of the
historical development of the theory (it is a collection of the foundational papers with commentary) and then this book to get an overview of the basic concepts.
So long as you don't
go in for mindless lying and so long as you are trying to have an
understanding of it that plausibly accounts for the
historical record than you ought to be able to come to a pretty good
understanding of how the climate works.
Rather they should
go and travel in the far northern parts of Canada and talk to the indiginous people with their long standing cultural -
historical understanding of that environment.
I think an individual firm can use technology to help them
go after the better - performing markets and by
understanding their firm's expertise and
historical matter performance can create pricing alternatives that drive firm profitability.»