I have seen in some Notes here that you cite
the historical worst case dividend cut across a broad spectrum of stocks as something like 25 %.
For example, some traders may only risk the worse drawdown on a trading system while others will risk 1.5 to 3 times
the historical worse case drawdown.
Not exact matches
Can we make a
case for seeing the angels in God's initial plan of creation not just as messengers but as in some way active agents with a specific role in the development of the evolutionary process, a role which he did not withdraw from those who rebelled, in the same way that he does not always or instantly remove
bad rulers who affect the development of the
historical process?
But for Dawkins, insisting on the factual basis of the story only made things
worse: «It may be based on a
historical event, in which
case it's shocking.»
Worst -
case scenario: The characters»
historical significance is celebrated at the expense of their humanity, resulting in something stiff, overly reverential, and frankly rather boring.
Kate Tilton presents Playing Fast and Loose with History: Writing
Historical Fiction posted at Kate Tilton, Connecting Authors & Readers, saying, «In most
cases, rewriting history is a
bad thing; revision is normally done to make
bad seem less
bad (see recent events for a nice example).
The
worst case would be that dividend yields never return to their
historical range.
If you had to accept a 40 - year
historical period at random, the very
worst case was from 1930 through 1969, which provided a compound return of 8.3 %.
The
worst case 30 - year
Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rates are 6 % (plus inflation) and higher.
For my argument to hold merit obviously the condition of the debt markets would have to be
worse than
historical precedent which by virtually any standard seems to be the
case.
Interest rates rise much higher than their
historical average and reach previous highs (this would be a
worse case scenario for variable rate student loan borrowers)
That's the value of the portfolio in the
worst possible
case, considering every return sequence we have seen in the
historical record.
-LSB-...](SWR) are based on
historical worst -
case scenarios for a retiree.
The
historical worst -
case withdrawal rate was above 4 % in only 4 of the 17 countries: Canada, Sweden, Denmark, and the United States.
The sentence reads: «Given that safe withdrawal rates are based on
historical worst -
case scenarios, and given the information we have about how
bad those
historical scenarios have been, we can begin to understand how
bad returns would really have to be, from here, to lead to a safe withdrawal rate that is
worse than anything seen in history.»
The return scenarios that have applied in the
historical record are considered and the withdrawal rate that barely works in the event that the
worst -
case return scenario happens to pop up starting from...
The
worst case 30 - year
Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rate of HSWR100V was 3.0 % for the sequence beginning in 1929.
The
worst case 30 - year
Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rate was 3.5 % for the sequence beginning in 1929.
The
worst case 30 - year
Historical Surviving Withdrawal Rate of HSWR100C was 3.5 % for the sequence beginning in 1929.
As the basis for a narrative there's some substantial material to work with here, especially one we stop to consider the
historical cases of entire countries intervening to depose rulers and replace them only for the new person to be just as
bad or even
worse.
After these threats are identified for each resource, then the relative risk from natural - and human - caused climate change (estimated from the global climate model projections, but also the
historical, paleo - record and
worst case sequences of events) can be compared with other risks in order to adopt the optimal mitigation / adaptation strategy.
A robust approach is to use
historical, paleo - record and
worst case sequences of climate events.
However, for regional downscaling (and global) models to add value (beyond what is available to the impacts community via the
historical, recent paleorecord and a
worst case sequence of days), they must be able to skillfully predict changes in regional weather statistics in response to human climate forcings.
VII, Inside the Law: Canadian Law Firms in
Historical Perspective edited by Carol Wilton
Bad Judgment: The
Case of Mr. Justice Leo Landreville by William Kaplan Canadian State Trials, Vol.
Worst case scenario, you find out the company's
historical background.