Sentences with phrase «historically nil»

Matt 5: 9 appears only once in the scriptures and therefore fails rigorous historic testing i.e. it is historically nil as is 67 % of the NT.

As noted many times with details, John 3:16 is historically nil by rigorous testing of the story as is all of John's gospel.

Said passage was judged to be historically nil.

Said passage is a single attestation found no where else in the NT making historically nil by rigorous modern day standards.

Said passage is a single attestation found no where else in the NT making said passage historically nil by rigorous modern day standards.

Had you taken more action on the reading front, you would determine that 1 John as with John's gospel is historically nil.

Jesus indeed existed but John's gospel has been judged to be historically nil by many contemporary experts.

and later copied by Luke with a minor mention by Mark also declared to be historically nil by many contemporary NTscholars.

Most of the Jesus «miracles» are noted in John's gospel which after very rigorous studying has been judged to be historically nil.

The Jesus and lust passage after rigorous historic testing by a number of NT scholars is historically nil.

Luke 12: 47 - 48: Said passage is a single attestation i.e. not found in any other scriptural docu - mentation and was written between 80 - 120 CE thereby failing rigorous historic testing and therefore historically nil.

And Matt 3: 2 («Repent...) has been rigorously analyzed by many contemporary NT scholars and found to be historically nil.

Had he done so, he would have concluded that Luke 4:18 as well as Luke 13:3.5 have been, after thorough review, judged to be historically nil.

Not exact matches

However, the USA has surplus refining capacity currently, with refineries running at a historically low rate of around 87 percent, and imports are essentially nil.