Sentences with phrase «history claims you've made»

Not exact matches

Ho is claiming responsibility for the split, saying in a statement: «Despite our positive history with Crown, I made the strategic decision to terminate the joint venture arrangement and allow Melco to pursue Japan alone.

Energy Future, the biggest power company in Texas, can claim an ignominious distinction in the annals of American business history: Warren Buffett considers his nearly $ 2 billion investment in the company's bonds one of the biggest mistakes he's ever made.

This quote marks an important time in financial history, the CEO of a global banking institution making objective claims about cryptocurrency.

If your spouse or former spouse has died and you qualify for survivor benefits based on his or her earnings history, it could make sense to apply for those benefits now and wait to claim your own retirement benefits until later, when they are higher.

Both make claims about human history that are demonstrably false.

It surely makes it unreliable, if not «dangerous,» to just turn part of Church history upside down and ignore the almost 2 millennia held facts and claim that it did not happen.

Religion makes it okay to lie, the proof is throughout it's history and even at its core, All those who claim to be religious have a huge amount of doubt and they fight that all their lives until they have an instance where they have no control.

And then the evidence of history pointed toward Jesus having lived, having made these extraordinary claims and then backing that up by returning from the dead.

That is, what appears to some solely as a new chapter in Jewish history (and the history of the Middle East), makes a claim on the Christian construal of history.

Read a few history books about how christians «converted» non-believers before you make silly claims.

You might want to study some of this history before making a claim like that,

you make claims with no history or facts to back them up then claim you come from religion that's open to questioning won't name it or answer questions

When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who got women the vote, who made birth control happen, who got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.

Many writers insist on the need for every discipline and discourse to have an explicitly theological framework; many make broad claims, confident generalizations covering long periods of history and whole disciplines, and fairly summary dismissals of periods and categories of thinkers with whom they differ.

And for the Christian faith, the claim to be made is that the moment of greatest intensity is the emergence in the sphere of history and of human life of the person of Jesus Christ, with all that he was and all that he continues to be, all that he did and all that he continues to do, all that he meant and all that he continues to mean for those who respond to him in heart's surrender.

Peter Hodgson's God in History, Mark Kline Taylor's Remembering Esperanza, and a number of feminist projects have recently made similar claims.

I suggest you learn a bit of history before you make claims like this.

«The New Testament makes the startling claim that in Christ history has achieved both its end and a new beginning.

Understand world and religious history before making claims like this.

What about all the other gods, all the other religions they make the exact same claim as you without any proof and history has shown over and over again those gods didn't exist either.

You then through a hissy fit and lied a little bit (your bread and butter), made outlandish claims and then accused me of not knowing jewish history because I gave you the real history and not the folklore that shows up in the bible.

And yes, if a Democrat claimed that the parties ideals, its platform, or its history was based on the «Will of god» or the concepts originated from god or made any unsubstatiated claim of fact pertaining to a god... THAT would be delusion.

This knowledge gives a kind of certainty such as is possible in the realm of history and freedom, that is as a claim to make freedom itself a binding norm.

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

«Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's,» which has indeed meant all things to all men, does assert that there are claims which God makes in history.

We must expect today, when we all know that a new era has begun in the history of human civilisation, that if the religion of Christ is true, and is founded upon the only claim which makes Christianity the hope of mankind - upon the Divinity personal and unambiguous of Jesus Christ - that we will find within the bosom of the Church's doctrine all that we need to fire the world anew, and to restore all things in Christ.

Often times I am looking for a clearer understanding of a time period in Christian history (generally because a modern author has made some wild and confrontational claim about how a certain doctrine or denomination arose).

so much so that they seek out something without any merit nor even a shredd of evidence and then claim it to be more then truth but the word of god who for all intents and purposes is equal to every other make believe creature in the entire history of man - kind!

January 31, 2012 at 5:13 pm Report abuse o Chad @HippyPoet» many people at this time and ALL THOUGHOUT history have made [the claim that they are the offspring of divine origin] Right now there is someone in South America who claims to be the reincarnated jesus himself — that's not a joke!

The same claim has been made for thousands of people throughout history.

@HippyPoet» many people at this time and ALL THOUGHOUT history have made [the claim that they are the offspring of divine origin] Right now there is someone in South America who claims to be the reincarnated jesus himself — that's not a joke!

Fortunately, most Christians today recognize that much of that traditional way Christians of centuries ago understood claims made in the scriptures must be rejected by the findings of history and the natural and human sciences.

Answer to question 1: many people at this time and ALL THOUGHOUT history have made such claims.

The most convincing part of the Bible is that regardless if you think its true or not it contains the story of the only Person in human history that made the outlandish claims (too many to recount) that he made and STILL has followers today; more than 2000 yrs after his assasination.

2) most medicine men throughout history along with snake oil salesmen have made the very same claims of being magical in manner.

In other words, we ought not to make claims for redemption today as if the kingdom of God had already arrived, and we should not spiritualize redemption in such a way that we remove it from history.

This claim, in theory and practice, is as exclusive as any made by certain religions in history, and has the same tragic consequences on the life of other people who refuse to accept such claims.

The claim here is that grace is something eternally real in the life of God, but that it is being played out on the stage of human history in a way that makes God all the greater for it.

The greatest claim to merit of the history of religions is precisely its effort to decipher in a «fact,» conditioned as it is by the historical moment and the cultural style of the epoch, the existential situation that made it possible.

Okay, that's obiously a facetious statment, and one could say I have no right to comment at all on a book I haven't read, but I can't help but smell a rat when someone is not willing to have his work examined when he is making claims related to human history.

The Arsenal and Chelsea managers have a long history of falling out, making comments about each other and their respective clubs and even pushing each other around on the touchline, even though they claimed that they had put all their differences aside before the last clash at Stamford Bridge.

Never doubted that lad at all... some time i made a comment about us only having him as a DM and some british lad lambasted on to me claiming i don't know any thing abt the game and went on to argue that Le coq is a B2B but during that very moment he was brought back and the rest is history (flamini was always a red card in waitng)

He previously carried Woodcreek High - Roseville to the CIF state title game, making history in the process for public schools and claiming the Timberwolves» first Division I section title.

The two best teams in European competition are bidding to make history by claiming a treble of domestic double and European glory.

At least next year and the year after the next will be there for the boss and his Gunners to make amend to their flaures to claim the UCL trophy for us and themselves for the first time in Arsenal FC history.

The Volunteers have finished ahead of Kentucky in the SEC for the last four seasons — the only basketball program in conference history that can make that claim.

When a team does do that, a best in school history claim can definitely be made, too.

Would it really make sense that a club claiming to be functionally «house poor», who has a lengthy history of thriftiness, would be willing to leverage everything in the kitty and more on a relatively unknown and unproven player that no one rated anywhere near that 11th hour price point.

The Daily Mirror claim the # 32.5 m fee will make Benteke Liverpool's second most expensive signing ever, Andy Carroll's move from Newcastle United being the most costly in their history.

French striker Anthony Martial was recruited from AS Monaco for a whopping # 36m last summer, according to Sky Sports, who claim that the deal made him the most expensive teenager in football history.