Aspirin poisoning diagnosis is usually based on
a history of aspirin ingestion.
Not exact matches
The team, led Julia C. Tchou, MD, PhD, an associate professor
of Surgery in the Perelman School
of Medicine at the University
of Pennsylvania, found that a
history of taking
aspirin was not associated with improved survival, regardless
of receptor status.
In one study, half
of 635 patients with a
history of colon or rectal cancer took one
aspirin daily while the rest took a placebo.
But now the prevailing view maintains that unless you have a worrisome
history of heart problems, an
aspirin regimen is about as likely to hurt you as help you.
Josep Rodes - Cabau, M.D.,
of Laval University, Quebec City, Canada, and colleagues randomly assigned 171 patients with an indication for atrial septal defect (ASD) closure and no
history of migraine to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (
aspirin + clopidogrel [the clopidogrel group], n = 84) or single antiplatelet therapy (
aspirin + placebo [the placebo group], n = 87) for 3 months following transcatheter ASD closure.
According to a study presented at the American College
of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology (ACAAI) Annual Scientific Meeting, 34 percent
of patients studied were mistakenly labeled as having
aspirin hypersensitivity if they had a
history of any gastrointestinal symptoms.
Researchers identified patients from 119 practices who were prescribed
aspirin between January 2008 and June 2013, excluding patients receiving
aspirin as a secondary prevention due to
history of cardiovascular disease such as myocardial infarction, prior stroke, and atrial fibrillation.
«On the opposite end
of the spectrum, if you don't have any calcified plaque, our estimations indicate that use
of aspirin would result in more harm than good, even if you have risk factors for heart disease such as high cholesterol or a family
history of the disease.»
Aspirin is nearly a hundred years old, and its forerunner, willow bark, was used since the dawn
of history.
Dr. Kirkman stresses that people with diabetes who are taking
aspirin — and have no
history of heart attack — should talk to their doctor and see if he or she recommends continuing the therapy.
(An important exception, he says, is people who have a known
history of ulcers, since
aspirin can make ulcers bleed.)
In the illustrations that accompany this Harvard study it says that the study was «adjusted for age; race; body - mass index; level
of physical activity; status with regard to smoking, whether a physical examination was performed for screening purposes, current multivitamin use, and current
aspirin use; status with regard to a family
history of diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, or cancer; status with regard to a
history of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia; intake
of total energy, alcohol, RED OR PROCESSED MEAT, fruits, and vegetables; and, for women, menopausal status and hormone use.»
Before doing massive amounts
of blood work and tests he put me on a daily baby
aspirin regimen because
of my clotting
history.
But painting this as the «normal», opinion - based sort
of consensus is a good denial tactic, as is highlighting the views
of the very few contrarian climate scientists (who are in the same boat as the people who authored negative trials on
aspirin, if there are any - they're destined for the dustbin
of science
history.)
Using extant results is an important part
of the statistical design
of experiments Look to the
histories of how people learned the size
of the earth, the (mean) distance from the earth to the sun, the speed
of light, the rates
of continental drift, the effects
of aspirin in reducing the risk
of recurrent heart attack.