Sentences with phrase «history of cancer does»

(8) A family history of cancer does not exclude you from the preferred rate class.

You can get their best health class if you quit smoking 3 years ago (most of the industry makes you wait 5 years); high blood pressure and cholesterol treated with medications can qualify for the best health classifications; if you're over 50 years old and are diabetic, you can qualify for «Standard» rates; family history of cancer doesn't exclude you from the preferred plus rating either (most companies it does).

Not exact matches

While cancer and Alzheimer's seemingly don't have that much in common, there is one key link that researchers at MD Anderson think could be useful: People with a history of cancer are less likely to get Alzheimer's, while people with Alzheimer's are less likely to get cancer.

Sometimes I wonder if perhaps the rooms of Alcoholics Anonymous have, at some point in its 76 year history, contained individuals who possessed the ability to do great things — cure cancer, revolutionize politics, or contribute other great things to society — but whose minds became so polluted with AA propaganda that they shut off their own brilliance and chose to spend the rest of their lives «making their sobriety their number one priority» and believing humility to be more valuable than fulfilling their potential and allowing their greatness to shine.

Let's assume you don't have a strong family history of any particular cancer, and so, aren't trying to hone in on avoiding one tumor over any other.

I have a strong history of breast cancer in my family (my mother passed away from it at 34), so we didn't waste any time finding the root cause of pumping so much blood.

By Andrew M. Seaman NEW YORK (Reuters Health)- Factors other than medical history and risk may influence women with cancer in one breast to have both breasts removed even if it doesn't improve their odds of survival, suggests a new study.

«For women without a family history,» she tells WebMD, «it may be that their rates of breast cancer are so low we don't detect a difference or there may not be a protective association.»

«Patients [with a family history of cancer] are very anxious and do a lot of annual tests — ultrasounds, mammograms,» says Mary Polan, a former chair of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Stanford University School of Medicine.

After sequencing tissue taken from 19 Taiwanese patients with upper urinary tract cancer, the researchers found that a control group of patients with upper urinary tract cancer but no history of birthwort use did not show the same pattern of mutations.

If a woman with a strong family history of breast and ovarian cancers tests negative for the BRCA1 / 2 genes, that does not mean her relatives are not at risk, says Daly — her siblings could still carry the gene, or there could be additional genes present that predispose them to cancer that clinicians don't yet know how to test for.

Patients with a history of breast cancer or lymphoma were more than three times as likely to develop heart failure — a condition in which the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs — compared with a similar group of patients who did not have cancer, according to data being presented at the American College of Cardiology's 67th Annual Scientific Session.

«Given the fact that genomic analysis is becoming more common in patients with a personal or family history of cancer, we have an opportunity to do more targeted breast cancer screening in women who carry any of the genes associated with risk for this disease.»

Currently, testing for Lynch syndrome genes is generally only done when someone has a personal or family history of colon or uterine cancer.

To illustrate potential mutation - specific effects on absolute cancer risks, we used the hazard ratio estimates to derive approximate absolute risks and 95 % confidence intervals, based on published estimates for the overall risks of breast and ovarian cancer by age 70 years.26 These estimates are for illustration and do not represent absolute risk estimates that would be required in a genetic counseling setting, as they do not account for noncancer outcomes that may influence a woman's life expectancy, the effects of family history, and nonrandom ascertainment of mutation carriers in this sample and depend on assumptions about the prevalence of different mutation classes in the population.

The researchers compared the genes of more than 8,000 white European women — including around 3,250 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, 3,400 women who did not have cancer and 2,000 women who had a family history of the disease.

Other known risk modifiers for breast cancer such as age at first pregnancy, history of oral contraceptive use, breast feeding, and smoking did not meaningfully confound the overall association of FMc absence with breast cancer.

Myth: Your father's family history of breast cancer doesn't affect your risk as much as your mother's.

Though having children and breast - feeding are known to lower a woman's risk of certain health issues — breast cancer is one — it doesn't mean a woman with a different reproductive history is less healthy: «Our data did not suggest that nulliparous [non-childbearing] women had poorer health as their BMI, physical activity levels, and smoking status were similar to parous women.»

He points to a study in which radiologists who learned about a patient's family history of breast cancer spotted more tumors than if they didn't have this information.

Another woman, with a family history of colon cancer, may do better avoiding it.

With a history of breast cancer on my mother's side, my tofu cleanse didn't mean anything if I was exposing myself to endocrine disrupters in other ways.

People who have a family history of colon cancer are more likely to get colon cancer than those who do not.

Adding other factors, such as assay batch, family history of breast cancer, age at menarche, breastfeeding, physical activity, childhood BMI, smoking, drinking status, and intake of fat and fiber into the multivariable model did not change the result appreciably, but reduced the precision.

In other words, because in their family history there are instances of heart disease, arthritis or cancer, there is nothing that they can do to prevent themselves from getting these diseases.

Maybe there isn't a history of cancer because you don't talk to a large part of your family anymore.

Does the dog's parents and grandparents have a history of vaccine - related illness, such as hip dysplasia and cancer?

Because some dogs are more apt to get cancer than others, if you don't know the history of the dog, just use all precautions.

While homeopathic remedies are not a cure for cancer, they do contain ingredients that have a history of helping the body fight cancer cells such as natural anti-oxidants.

Do not give to cats that have a history of cancer, feline leukemia or feline immunodeficiency virus or that are sensitive to cyclosporine.

Naomi Oreskes, a professor of history and science studies at the University of California, San Diego, compares the strategy of these early groups to that of the tobacco industry, which for decades argued that cigarettes didn't cause cancer.

Moreover, the paper gets its history wrong when it notes that «Total cancer mortality rates did not decline until 1990, 25 years after the identification of the effect of smoking on lung and other cancers...» Well, actually, it was more like 50 years, because the earliest studies to connect smoking and lung cancer were conducted not by NIH - funded scientists but by Nazi scientists in the run - up to World War II.4 By the logic of the PNAS paper, then, ought we to be crediting the Nazi health science agenda with whatever progress has been made on reducing lung cancer, rather than the incredibly protracted and difficult public health campaign (that, for the most part, NIH had nothing to do with) aimed at getting people to cut down on smoking?

Generally what we need for the lung cancers and the other gastrointestinal cancers is a finding of exposure, and that's done through a careful work history process.

A family history of heart disease, or a parent dying prior to age 60 can also put you in the standard plus or standard health rating category, although there are some life insurance companies that don't a family history of cancer against you — and we can help you use those companies if that is the case for you.

We've helped many of our clients with bladder cancer histories secure the best rates on the market available to them and can do the same for you.

A thirty two year old female, who does not smoke, resides in California if of the average height and weight, does not have a criminal history, does not participate in dangerous activities, who is in overall OK health and takes some medications, or may have a family history of Heart Attacks, Strokes, Diabetes, Liver Disease, cancer before the approximate ages of 70, may will be able to qualify for a Standard Plus policy.

A thirty two year old female, who does not smoke, resides in California if of the average height and weight, does not have a criminal history, possibly does participate in dangerous activities, or who is OK health, or takes some medications, and does have a family history of Heart Attacks, Strokes, Diabetes, Liver Disease, cancer before the approximate ages of 70, may will be able to qualify for a Standard Non Tobacco.

Not everyone will be able to take advantage of a no medical exam life insurance policy — for instance, if you're applying with an insurer who doesn't offer accelerated underwriting, there's not much you can do about it, and certain family history conditions like cancer may automatically disqualify you — but there are two groups of people who might be particularly interested in going down this path.

If a life insurer decides that your history of family cancer makes you too risky to cover, or the rates are prohibitively expensive, don't give up.

Unlike something like heart disease or a family history of cancer, life insurance companies don't have a wealth of medical research and claims experience to refer to when setting rates for marijuana users.

For example, an applicant lies and says they don't have a history of smoking in order to avoid a costly Smoker classification, but dies a year into their policy from lung cancer or some other lung - related affliction, the insurance company can investigate, determine the death was smoking - related, and decline to pay the death benefit because of application fraud.

You do not have to be the perfect human specimen to qualify for affordable life insurance; if you do have any conditions (e.g. diabetes, history of cancer, heart issues) we shop your medical profile around to the insurance companies with work with to find you the best price.

I don't recommend it to everybody, because it is usually more expensive than general health insurance, but if you have a strong family history of cancer, it's worth some research. CancerInsurance.com lets you shop and compare among different critical illness policies.

VOYA is one of the very few companies that do not ask applicants if they have a family history of cancer, which can impact your rating.

Family history of colon cancer is an established risk factor for the disease, but only one study, according to Henderson's team, has looked at whether family history affects the link between HRT and colon cancer risk — and it found no evidence that it did.

If you have a history of blood cancer, don't hesitate to apply for life insurance.

Also, ReliaStar will does not hold any family history of cancer against you...

• Do you have any family history of cancer, heart disease, stroke or diabetes?

We were able to move George's application to a company that did not consider a family history of cancer and he was approved for $ 130.05 with an A + rated company.

Voya (ReliaStar Life Insurance Company) is one of the only insurance companies in the country that do not count family history of cancer into your rating.