Sentences with phrase «history of the kind of person»

Not exact matches

That's an exercise that's counterintuitive to us, in part because, for most people at most points in human history, that kind of longevity was utterly out of reach.

This kind of violence is unprecedented in YouTube's 13 - year - history, though Aghdam's anger and paranoia aren't unique among the millions of people who create and post videos to the site, according to five former YouTube employees.

If their robot executes trades with the kind of profit the site claims, then why would the people behind it want to hide that fact by providing no trade history at all?

I think what should be is difficult for any person with any kind of criminal background history, domestic violence, mental instability, all of those things, regardless.

In the history of human kind, few people have been as widely quoted as Jesus.

(Those with bad childhoods may want to make sure that history is not repeated for other people, and those with good chidhoods will want to make sure that other children have the same kind of childhood).

There are people all around the world dying because of their faith, whether Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, or etc. «Martyrdom» may remind you of Christianity's history of «violence, intolerance, and fanaticism»... but why be reminded of something that ocurred in the past when religious persecution is still happening today among people of all kinds of faiths, including Christians?

you are a moron there is all kinds of evidence you idiot his name is written in jewish history book's and roman history book some people

When we reduce this complex and important conversation to two «sides,» as though it were some kind of college football rivalry, we do such an injustice to the Bible, to Christian history, and to the millions upon millions of real people whose lives and whose futures we are discussing.

Cheap fossil fuel has turned us into the first people in human history who have essentially no need of each other — a kind of hyperindividualism has replaced community.

Although Jesus had some decent ideals (regardless of what kind of being you think he was), history shows us that Christianity, the religion, for as much as it has aided people, has been political, corrupt (well just human to be kinder) right from the git - go, and the cause of enormous evil and suffering throughout its history.

Meanwhile, there have been people throughout history making all kinds of end - of - the - world predictions, and none of them ever came true.

Throughout most of Western history people have believed in some kind of moral order within which they made sense of their lives.

sure you might point out that people killed one another throughout history over their beliefs and what kind of God would want that?

There is nothing here to portray either calling or election as some kind of irresistible decree that a person should repent and believe (Marston and Forster, God's Strategy in Human History, 164).

Probably because they were intellectually unimpressed with the myths and deities of their own people, Greek thinkers reasoned to a kind of philosophical deity that was much more a God of eternity than a God of history, much more compatible with the biblical image of Yahweh than with the image of Lord.

Even if they made any kind of sense, in the history of civilization more people have been killed in the name of god than for any other reason.

Thus the spectacle of persons in Stalin's Russia willingly confessing deeds or words they never committed or spoke, not out of guilt or masochism but out of loyalty to the necessities of the movement's logic which has called for a certain kind of crime to be committed and confessed at a particular point in history.

This has to be learned from lots of firsthand experience with all kinds of people in all kinds of situations, as well as from novels and poetry, history and psychology, and again, of course, the Bible and theology.

This kind of watered down Judaism has put us on the edge of an Iran with a bomb, Obama in office and an Israel at risk.Religion is not about compromise that is a bumper sticker far too many have bought into.When the next great history of the Jewish people is written, they will write we did it to ourselves - trying to be oh so tolerant we put ourselves in a state where we ended up being unrecognizable to those who paid so much for us to lamely claim to be Jews in a primarily anti-semitic world pushing us to compromise.

Abe has a rebuttal at the end of the book in which he tries to provide a justification for giving history and ethics, and thus persons, the kind of seriousness that the Western participants insist on.

But when history is understood (after Hegel's fashion) as the self - revelation of God, the result is a kind of aestheticism which in benign comprehension largely disregards the contours of history — nations, races, people, even the sufferings of individuals.

I'm not a bible thumping «you got ta think as I do» kind of person, but I will say that for all of recorded history religion has existed on one form or another.

What is in essence remembered, and rightly remembered, is that the institutions of Israelite prophetism and priesthood were present in the people's history from the very earliest times, and that they developed together in the closest kind of relationship.

Rather, it resides in the relationship with God which such existence may and does enjoy, whether this is realized or actualized in a vivid manner or is present only as a kind of Leitmotif which runs through the whole history of the human race and the personal history of each and every human person as a member of the society of men and women.

You stated as well, ``... religions have had periods throughout history where they committed murder and putting people down in all kinds of ways — and it was in the name of the religion.

Given that this is the Patriots and more specifically Brady, it's likely people will complain that the fine wasn't enough, but it's not as though Brady has a history of this kind of thing.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Even that kind of person should be wise enough to cast aside that history and see that this is a new type of story that you should embrace.

The history, light, air, music, food, and people all creates a very particular kind of energy that can makes me feel more connected to the earth than any other place I've been.

Throughout history, people have married for all kinds of reasons that had nothing to do with love — primarily for business and monetary gain, for political gain and to procreate.

Though the current Congress is the most diverse in history, people working for Democratic senators are overwhelmingly white and mostly women, according to a first - of - its - kind report on diversity in some congressional offices.

There is no widely agreed definition of what constitutes «a people»; in general, though, the term generally denote [s] a kind of collective identity that is grounded in a shared history and culture and may or may not lay claim to some kind of political recognition as well as a specific territory.

Warren urged the audience to join her as she works to reclaim Rochester's history as the kind of city where people like her grandparents moved to find better opportunities.

In one of the first studies of its kind to use a special scanning technique, researchers found that people with a history of heart disease had substantially lower cortical volumetric bone mineral density in their wrist bone (the distal radius) than those without.

«At P&G, when someone comes for a day visit to be considered for a job offer, typically an hour of that day will be set aside for a three - person panel to probe these areas and find out what kind of history these individuals have in terms of demonstrating whether these skills are present,» says Webb.

When they include an attribute such as «ZIP code,» they're expressing the opinion that the history of human behavior in that patch of real estate should determine, at least in part, what kind of loan a person who lives there should get.

Although this is the largest study of its kind so far, the number of participants involved was small, and included older people who had a history of multiple falls.

As Swarthmore College psychologist Barry Schwartz wrote in a 2000 article in American Psychologist, «I think it is only a slight exaggeration to say that for the first time in human history, in the contemporary United States large numbers of people can live exactly the kind of lives they want, unconstrained by material, economic, or cultural limitations.»

Though there's still much societal progress to be made, it's good that more people in the early 21st century than at any other time in history enjoy the freedom and means to pursue the kind of life that's right for them.

Your kind of garbage pseudoscience is exactly why people keep up with the pro-agriculture apologetics in the face of all the damage agriculture has done over the course of civilized human history in the past 10,000 years.

Like you had energy, you may have been stressed, you may have been anxious but you had the energy, you know, behind you to do all the things that you needed to do, and then at some point, it started to teeter out where, you know, you're having less energy, you're feeling more fatigue, you need more naps, you need more time sleeping, you spend more time resting on the weekend, and most people when we do a detail history, we see that pattern kind of unfolding and we progress, that's called stage 1 — again, depending on what lab you use, there's a lab called Diagnos - Techs out of Washington, they have like a 7 phases of adrenal fatigue — I like keeping things really simple.

I like to listen to both sides of an argument, look at the facts (not theories) from both sides and especially look at our evolutionary history to see what kinds of foods people all over the world have eaten for thousands, and hundreds of thousands, of years that sustain optimal health.

Texture as in embroidery (kind of a texture at least) was also important for fashion history, but more for the upper class rather than the everyday person.

Many people have gained these skills throughout history without any kind of formal online dating postdoctoral jobs, imagine capitalism or a.

There aren't a lot of people who do this job who have the kind of genuine adoration for what the cinema is, or what cinematic history is, or what made us fall in love with movies in the first place.

It's rarely a film that people point to first as a sign of Welles» mastery, but it's no less essential to understanding his place in cinema history, and Criterion continues to prove their commitment to his filmography by LOADING this release with the kind of special features that make it desirable to cinephiles.

If you enjoyed the inert, slightly off - brand version of an Adam McKay - Will Ferrell comedy in the first film — and you're not the kind of person to be put off by Mel Gibson's documented history of psychotic behavior being played once again for cuddly laughs — chances are you won't mind taking an eggnog nap while it plays on TBS someday.

They dig further back into cinema's history than you might think and go through the tropes of this subgenre to try to explain why people like this kind of movie so much.

The show was a full, inclusive version of U.S. history that took care to lift up the narratives of often - marginalized people — and it was also a way of creating the kind of world Mac would like to see.