In the 4,000 - year
history of the legal profession, unbiased information sharing has never been the norm.
I notice that none of that needed ABS, so I ask again, why in the name of all things holy would we ever sell our ownership of the no - worse - than - second - most - important profession in the World to an extra layer of entirely profit motived remote investors when (a) we do not have to, (b) every last benefit claimed for ABS can be achieved without ABS, and (c) it would be utterly irreversible when it proves to be, as it most assuredly will prove to be, the most colossal, short - sighted, cynical, profiteering at the expense of the public, and unnecessary blunder in
the history of the legal profession dating back 800 years?
The other relevant aspect of nontraditional legal services is the fact that, for the first time in
the history of the legal profession, law firms are facing major competition from clients, as well as other firms.
Instead, the rich
history of the legal profession is shaping the future.
The next decade, I imagine, will be the most transformational in the long, storied
history of the legal profession.
On my blog Library Boy, I have posted a number of items in the past about the material dimension of
the history of the legal profession
From award - winning biographer Philip Girard, Lawyers and Legal Culture in British North America is the first
history of the legal profession in Canada to emphasize its cross-provincial similarities and its deep roots in the colonial period.
Not exact matches
«That was the other opportunity — to make a difference within not just the
legal profession but corporate Canada at large,» says Saguil, who was drawn to TD in part because
of its
history of sponsoring Pride events.
As I mentioned in the previous post, I believe that this state
of affairs largely arises from the deep
history of protection
of confidentiality within the
legal profession and the mistaken notion that protection
of confidentiality equals protection
of privacy and ensures compliance with the relevant
legal requirements that surround the protection
of privacy and use
of information.
Although Women's
History Month is coming to a close, the issues faced by women in the
legal profession are still in dire need
of continued conversation.
After providing a brief
history of women in the
legal profession, Stein's article analyzes blog entries on topics such as equal pay, institutional discrimination and gender dynamics and then suggests reasons why women lawyers seeking equality might turn to blogging in place
of legal channels.
About Dye & Durham Corporation: Dye & Durham Corporation is a wholly owned Canadian company with a long and reputable
history of serving the
legal profession and is Western Canada's premier supplier
of worldwide
legal support and information services.
Therefore, the problem and its long
history of failure, requires government intervention, because law societies, being the regulators
of the
legal profession in Canada, do not realize that they do not understand the true nature
of the problem and won't accept the fact that they and all other such institutions within the
legal profession do not have the expertise necessary to solve the problem.
Moore ends his discussion
of this
history noting that Law Society leaders subsequently acknowledged «in their way, that the Law Society alone no longer set the agenda on
legal aid and much else affecting the
profession.
[I] n carrying out its mandate under its enabling statute, the respondent throughout its long
history, has acted to remove obstacles based on considerations, other than ones based on merit, such as religious affiliation, race, and gender, so as to provide previously excluded groups the opportunity to obtain a
legal education and thus become members
of the
legal profession in Ontario.
As I have said repeatedly, the Canadian
legal profession is now entering the most disruptive period
of time in its
history.
The real thrust
of the project is to act as a catalyst for integrating the School's
history, library collections and archival resources into the life and work
of the Osgoode community by involving the students in developing and curating exhibitions, both physical and virtual, that illustrate the dramatic changes in
legal education and the
profession over the course
of the past century and document Osgoode's role in them.
I will reserve a future post to explore some thoughts on what is said at the AALS program, but it is particularly fitting to have the Justice at this joint program since, in addition to her pivotal role in the modern
history of women's rights, she was also a founder
of the Section for Women in
Legal Education and a trailblazer for women in our
profession, as this paper by Herma Hill Kay, this year's recipient
of the Women in
Legal Education section's Ruth Bader Ginsburg Lifetime Achievement Award, sets out so well.
Through years
of experience specializing in the placement
of top lawyers with premier
legal employers, we have developed extensive information systems, research materials, and referral networks enabling us not only to understand the
history and workings
of the
legal profession but also to stay abreast
of trends and changes affecting recruiting and job search strategies.
The
legal community has confronted the challenge
of adapting to technological innovation throughout its
history (albeit, generally somewhat behind the technological curve), but artificial intelligence and its use in the
legal profession is relatively new.
This is part
of a series
of Q&A s with leading women in the
legal profession to coincide with International Women's Day on 8 May and National Women's
History Month in the US, conducted and written by the law firm recruiting company Major Lindsey & Africa.
If you're looking for a bit
of nostalgia about the
legal profession or a
history lesson, take some time to read Bruce MacEwen's detailed conversation with Arnie Jacobs, a longstanding partner at Proskauer in New York and a «dean
of securities law.»
ICLR has an long
history of serving the
legal profession.
When we point out that the burden really lies upon those who would toss aside centuries
of history on short - term, flimsy evidence, who ignore the actual evidence
of heavy consolidations with more to follow, who would saddle us with a change that would be irreversible regardless
of how much harm it later engendered, who would risk so much
of what the
legal profession has stood for, who refuse to work anywhere near as hard on real solutions to real problems as they do on this pig - in - a-poke, then we are met with silence or insults.
Never in our
history has the LSUC ever contemplated selling any molecule
of ownership
of the
legal profession to non-lawyers, let alone huge swathes
of it.
It is not coincidence that a centuries - long
history of dispute resolution through trial changed so rapidly once women entered the
legal profession in significant numbers.
In the law review article, Jayne frames her argument for the
profession to embrace a new model, by first laying out the
history of fee - sharing regulation in the
legal profession.
As he mentions in his intro post last week, the blog deals with «the various aspects
of legal history having to do with the daily life
of lawyers and judges, as well as to the sources, manuscript, printed, and otherwise preserved which can be used to help understand how law and the
legal profession functioned in the past.
What I really wanted to share here is a piece
of that
history, a time in the
legal profession that seems hard to believe, from today's vantage point, actually existed.
Editor's note: This is part
of a series
of Q&A s with leading women in the
legal profession, in honor
of National Women's
History Month.
It belongs to all
of us and in the case
of the manner in which the Law Society
of British Columbia made its decision it was a decision made transparently and democratically after a debate informed by law,
history and an expression
of the modern values
of the
legal profession.
An earlier wave
of sociological research on the
legal profession in the 1960s and 1970s, for example, pushed the
legal profession courses
of an earlier generation to include more sociology and
history — as suggested once again by the Carnegie Report.
This collection serves as a valuable visual record
of the
history of the top levels
of the judicial and
legal professions in Ontario.
A
history of volunteer work or community service evidences your potential to make a contribution to society and the
legal profession.
Since its inception in 1979, the Society has published more than 100 books and conducted more than 600 oral
history interviews
of leading members
of the
legal profession.
«The National Equal Justice Library (NEJL) is the first and only institution dedicated to documenting and preserving the
legal profession's
history of providing counsel for those unable to afford it....»
He has published extensively in the fields
of legal education and the
legal profession,
legal history and
legal theory, labour and administrative law, globalization and constitutionalism.
Embracing the constitutional imperative to realise the freedom and equality
of everyone and accepting that our inequitable past has produced the economic and skills distortions overwhelmingly favouring white male practitioners to the prejudice
of black and female practitioners in the
legal profession, and now committing to correct that
history;
One can only wonder how the
history of this country might have fared had members
of the
legal profession refused to accept as somehow legitimate the culture which legalized slavery or which institutionalized segregation or anti-Semitism, all
of which were accepted practices and expressions at one time, and all
of which were then, and are now reprehensible.8 Id.
; (4) taxpayers would not have to pay for a justice system that provides lawyers a good place to earn a living but doesn't provide affordable
legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all
of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole
of Canada's
history (6) the
legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal profession would be expanding instead
of contracting; because, (7) if
legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead
of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the
legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal profession, and to
legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost
of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal services for taxpayers who finance
legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal aid's free
legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?&r
legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter
of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help
of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy
of the world»; (13) the public statements
of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause
of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your
Legal Bill - To High?&r
Legal Bill - To High?»
Loss
of ownership then followed when the governments there decided to further weaken the
legal profession by muddying the ownership and the ethos (the ethos will weaken over time — human nature and
history prove it).
Written communications have a long
history of supporting elitism, and the
legal profession has done well from its ability to use those writing instruments.
«Never before in the
history of this country has the
legal profession seen mobility to this extent.
The Osgoode Society for Canadian
Legal History invites young members of the profession for an evening of discussion and engagement with legal his
Legal History invites young members of the profession for an evening of discussion and engagement with legal h
History invites young members
of the
profession for an evening
of discussion and engagement with
legal his
legal historyhistory.
Suggested topics include conflicts and the duty
of loyalty, whistleblowing, the adversarial role, judicial ethics, emerging
legal ethics issues from new technologies, parallels between
legal ethics and other
professions, the
legal history of ethics,
The stated purpose
of the Osgoode Society is «to study and promote public interest in the
history of the law, the
legal profession and the judiciary in Ontario and elsewhere in Canada and to stimulate research and publication on these subjects».
That said, 2007 is likely to prove to be one
of the most important years in recent
history for our
profession and for the Law Society — primarily because the
Legal Services Bill will complete its passage through Parliament.
Suggested topics include conflicts and the duty
of loyalty, whistleblowing, the adversarial role, judicial ethics, emerging
legal ethics issues from new technologies, parallels between
legal ethics and other
professions, the
legal history of ethics, ethics issues that arise in relation to such areas as environmental, human rights, privacy, international or health law, or any other aspect
of ethics and law.
The
legal profession, if
history holds true, will be one
of the last to get it.