What should we do if we can not
hit emissions targets?
Many parties bound by the Kyoto Protocol are faltering in efforts to
hit emissions targets.
Not exact matches
The automaker has claimed that its new diesel engines will
hit the European Union's beefed - up
emissions targets by improving filters and building in electric generators to start cars.
It's hard to put an exact time on it, but I do think we can still
hit the Paris Agreement's
target of net zero
emissions by the second half of this century.
From a climate point of view, the key expectation of Friday's meeting was that it would deliver enough
emission reductions to
hit Canada's 2030
target.
The climate deal struck late Friday in Ottawa committed premiers and the prime minister to work together to
hit our country's
emission targets.
However, the Jaccard paper also includes a second scenario, one where Canada
hits its
target by pairing a far lower price — $ 40 a tonne — with smart regulations to cut
emissions from buildings, transportation and industrial process.
No doubt about it: if they're built and filled, new pipelines would grow Canada's
emissions and make it harder to
hit our
targets.
It requires the UK to steadily reduce its harmful greenhouse gas
emissions and
hit legally - binding carbon
targets.
«Even with the strongest possible assumptions, we can not
hit carbon
emissions targets by energy and process efficiency within the existing system,» says Allwood.
If nations
hit their reduction
targets, global carbon dioxide
emissions would level off, even as electricity demand continues to rise.
As state - owned energy enterprises in China continue to have a big say in policy matters, the country's goal to cut greenhouse gas
emissions may not necessarily
hit Beijing's desired statistical
target.
The last update, the Kyoto Protocol, only binds three dozen industrialized countries to cut
emissions, and many of the adherents are not on track to
hit their
targets by 2012, when its terms expire.
Nitrous oxide and sulfur hexafluoride contain no carbon, yet
emissions — measured by estimating how much carbon dioxide would exert the same climate effect — count in countries
hitting or missing
targets and the like.
The findings have cheered environmentalists and climate campaigners, who see signs that the country could
hit proposed
targets for
emissions in 2020 without too much cost or disruption.
Even if Russia is to
hit the more stringent 30 % end of its
target, this means that the country can grow its
emissions by 41 % between 2012 and 2030.
This is weaker than the EU's
target of a 40 % reduction in
emissions by 2030 on 1990 levels, and the US
target of a 26 - 28 % reduction in
emissions by 2025 on 2005 levels — although Jonathan Grant, head of sustainability and climate change at PwC, suggests Japan does need to decarbonise at a slightly faster rate than the EU and the US to
hit its
target.
The US has a long way to go to
hit its 17 %
emission reduction
target according to the World Resources Institute (Source: SolarWorld)
If the country's economy grows enough then the
target could be
hit, provided industry becomes more efficient in its use of fossil fuel produced power, even if total carbon
emissions actually rise.
The two
targets suggest that Russia's
emissions will continue to rise after 2020, peak at some stage, and then decline until they
hit 2020 levels once again.
In most models that show the world reducing
emissions enough to
hit the 2 °C climate
target, «solar energy emerges only as a minor mitigation option» — around 5 to 17 percent of global electricity supply in one representative study used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
75 % of the housing stock will need to be upgraded to A2 BERs by 2050 if Ireland is to
hit its 80 % CO2
emissions reductions
target.
It is governments engaging in treaties and passing laws to
hit certain CO2
emission targets that CHOOSES what future
emissions will be.
But for larger organizations seeking to
hit emissions reduction
targets and meet broader sustainability goals, there are a number of other criteria to consider when choosing your offset provider.
For example, the EU countries and Canada are deliberately CHOOSING to limit their
emissions by trying to
hit the Kyoto Protocol
targets.
To
hit our 2020
target, we need to cut
emissions by 170 million tonnes: approximately equivalent to the total greenhouse gas output of Alberta.
Australia's government boasts of being one of the few nations to
hit its Kyoto
emissions target.
The falling prices could damage the North Sea and fledgling fracking industries and make it harder for the UK to
hit its legally binding
targets to cut carbon
emissions.
In short, California's new rooftop solar mandate might make it more expensive for the state to
hit its renewable energy and carbon
targets without yielding any net new solar build or
emission reductions.
In a nutshell,
hitting Paris
targets will mean both that developed nations start rapidly reducing toward net - zero
emissions by mid-century and that developing nations find a different path to prosperity than the one traveled by the countries around them holding all the wealth and still, on a per - capita basis, emitting the most carbon.
It's really kind of a sliding scale - if we start today, we'd need less drastic cuts and we'd have more time to
hit a given
emissions target.
Any policy to cut
emissions will impose a cost, so the Government's 26 - 28 % by 2030
target will be a «
hit» to real GDP that will account for a large chunk of the $ 600 billion.
«We estimate that by actively increasing farm yields, the UK can reduce the amount of land that is a source of greenhouse gases, increase the «sink», and sequester enough carbon to
hit national
emission reduction
targets for the agriculture industry by 2050.»
Attempts to negotiate a new market mechanism
hit a wall at the UN's climate negotiations in Warsaw in November, with developing countries, including India, resisting pressure from the EU to establish a new scheme before an overall
emissions reduction
target had been established.
We need only an 11 percent
emission reduction below existing (2015) levels to
hit CPP
targets, not a 32 percent
emission reduction.
Every single analysis published since the final CPP rulemaking finds that, even if optimistic scenarios don't come to pass, states need do little to
hit EPA
emission targets.
If some kind of political change makes governments serious about
hitting the 1.5 — 2.0 ËšC temperature
targets from the Paris Agreement, it will mean doing everything possible to rapidly reduce
emissions, from imposing high carbon prices to mandating the abandonment of especially harmful technologies and practices like burning coal and using exceptionally filthy fuel for international maritime shipping.
Quantity
targets enforced by treaty don't foster effective cooperation, they hinder it... to succeed, measures to curb
emissions need to be sustained for decades... Binding
emissions targets are too rigid... The best instrument for coordinating climate - change efforts is the price of carbon... For most countries, the simplest and clearest way to
hit the price
target would be with an outright carbon tax.
If the United States left its
emissions untouched for the next decade and then tried to
hit its
target for 2030, the necessary cuts would become so drastic and disruptive that they'd never pass the legislature.
There was also less support for carbon capture and storage, new nuclear build, small - scale hydropower and natural gas stations as viable ways to
hit targets for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions.