The remarks by Clegg, which are relatively recent, may undermine his claim that he has no preference over a future Lib Dem coalition partner if the party
holds the balance of power after the next election.
Many people may be impressed by the notion of a party prepared to foreswear the attractions of ministerial cars and salaries, just as the pollsters are prepared to speculate that the Lib Dems may, conceivably,
hold the balance of power after the next election and find themselves able to dictate terms.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, smaller parties such as the Greens, the Liberal Democrats, the UK Independence Party (UKIP) and the Scottish National Party (SNP) could
hold the
balance of power in a hung parliament
after May 2015.
Although last week's local election results were hardly inspiring for the Liberal Democrats, they did well enough where they have MPs to suggest that they have the potential to retain enough seats to
hold the
balance of power again
after the 2015 election.
I remain intrigued by the prospect
of Alex Salmond and dozens
of MPs
holding the
balance of power at Westminster post-election; it will be little more than the main parties deserve
after the contemptuous way they treated those inclined to vote yes in the independence referendum.
Moreover, an earlier minor party which
held the
balance of power in 1996 split in two
after a year in coalition with National, with one side supporting the continued National Party led government — and neither half
of this party is represented in Parliament today.
After the 2010 election, with a hung parliament, and the Liberal Democrats potentially
holding the
balance of power, AV + was again the subject
of discussion, as a potential part
of a coalition deal.
After affirming the trial judge's decision that Mr. Allen was actually terminated on October 14, 2009, the Court
of Appeal for British Columbia cited with approval the decision
of Bowes v. Goss
Power Products Ltd., 2012 ONCA 425, (canvassed by this blog in the post Fix the Duty to Mitigate) in which the Court
of Appeal for Ontario
held that if an employment contract provides for a fixed severance package there is no duty on the employee to mitigate his damages, and
held that as Mr. Allen's employment agreement did not impose a duty to mitigate, the trial judge properly found he was therefore entitled to the
balance owing for 15 months» salary and benefits in lieu
of notice as damages for breach
of contract.