So, no, while such embargoes wouldn't
hold up in court most outlets would never break them anyway because it would be like shooting yourself in the foot.
Not exact matches
But the
court in which these emails end
up having the
most significant consequences is the
court of public opinion or
in privately
held evaluations.
Most lawyers I know think that food libel laws will not
hold up in court.
Granted,
most of the things you
hold court for revolve around money, which ends
up being repetative and
in the end your choices don't really matter.
Time will tell whether the particular issues with the system (the 2 hour time limit
in particular) will
hold up under the ACL, and I can easily imagine Valve being taken to
court over their downright terrible customer service system (particularly when it comes to trying to obtain refunds), but for the
most part, the issue of refunds seems to be fixed for the moment.
The U.S. Supreme
Court may be the next stop
in a long and winding lawsuit over whether the Norton Simon Museum is obligated to give
up a pair of Renaissance paintings that have been among its
most prized
holdings since the 1970s.
I would submit that this form is
most valuable to lawyers who end
up litigating on behalf of litigants claiming damages or defending their positions against same based upon not only dishonest and misleading statements that
most assuredly appear on these SPIS smooth deal - facilitator documents, but also upon assumed honestly
held but nevertheless misleading statements (the seller «thinks» he / she knows the correct answer to a question, but
in fact does «not» know for sure, and guesses... yes... or no) that can ultimately lead to an expensive
court case.
Most investors search Google, find a few lease options that may or may not work for their properties and cross their fingers that the lease will
hold up in court if there is ever a problem.